Coffey Burlington Partner Reinstated After Ouster From Miami-Dade Transit Trust
Coffey Burlington partner Paul Schwiep was kicked off the Miami-Dade Citizens' Independent Transportation Trust after representing an environmental group that opposed the county's plans to build an expressway.
January 29, 2020 at 04:00 PM
3 minute read
Miami Coffey Burlington partner Paul J. Schwiep will reclaim his seat on the Miami-Dade Citizens' Independent Transportation Trust after suing over what he claimed was a politically motivated ousting.
The Third District Court of Appeal sided with Schwiep Wednesday, affirming a ruling from Miami-Dade Circuit Judge Pedro Echarte, who found Schwiep shouldn't have been removed from the trust. The group is an independent body that supervises and audits half-penny sales surtax for transit operations.
Schwiep had served as a trustee since 2006, and was chair for three years. But he was kicked off after representing an environmental group that opposed the county's plans to extend State Road 836 by 14 miles into the Everglades.
This didn't sit well with Miami-Dade County Mayor Carlos Gimenez, who'd pledged to build the new road. The mayor urged the director of the Citizens' Independent Transportation Trust to invoke a rule that blocks members from suing over county policy.
Schwiep's lawsuit claimed the rule didn't support his removal, since he wasn't a litigant in the case, and because it was an administration petition—not a lawsuit.
Declining to weigh in on all claims, the Third DCA agreed the ordinance didn't apply because what Schwiep had filed was not a lawsuit.
"An administrative petition is not a 'lawsuit' in normal legal usage," the opinion said. "The County Attorney's office routinely invokes this distinction when it raises a party's failure to exhaust administrative remedies as a well-recognized condition precedent for the commencement of a variety of lawsuits."
|Billion-dollar boondoggle?
Counsel to the Citizens' Independent Transportation Trust director, Miami-Dade County Attorney Abigail Price-Williams and assistant county attorneys Dennis Kerbel, Oren Rosenthal and Annery Alfonso did not immediately respond to a request for comment.
Schwiep said he was glad to be reinstated and called the planned expressway a "$1 billion road boondoggle" that will "save West Kendall commuters six minutes on commutes downtown while destroying hundreds of acres of wetlands and farmland."
"The administration decided to waste time and energy on a personal vendetta rather than address our mobility crisis," he said. "I'm especially grateful to Commissioner Daniela Levine Cava, who appointed me, for standing by me during this process. I'll continue to be a strong advocate on the Transportation Trust for increasing all transit options and using trust funds to implement real solutions to our congestion."
That administrative challenge is still pending.
Schwiep's attorney, Jeffrey Crockett of Coffey Burlington, noted that his client litigated against the county in a prior environmental case involving leaking sewage in Key Biscayne without any issue.
"Everything he's doing is done in the interest of the citizens. It's all consistent," Crockett said. "He's a believer in it. He is the voice for mass transit, SunPass and using the money as the people intended."
|Read the ruling:
More appeals:
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2024 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllCOVID-19 Death Suit Against Nursing Home Sent to State Court, 11th Circuit Affirms
Year-End Tax Planning: How Real Estate Investors Can Leverage Qualified Opportunity Funds
5 minute read'Horror of Horrors': Florida Judges Spar Over En Banc Review in Binance Ruling
4 minute readLaw Firms Mentioned
Trending Stories
- 1Elon Musk Names Microsoft, Calif. AG to Amended OpenAI Suit
- 2Trump’s Plan to Purge Democracy
- 3Baltimore City Govt., After Winning Opioid Jury Trial, Preparing to Demand an Additional $11B for Abatement Costs
- 4X Joins Legal Attack on California's New Deepfakes Law
- 5Monsanto Wins Latest Philadelphia Roundup Trial
Who Got The Work
Michael G. Bongiorno, Andrew Scott Dulberg and Elizabeth E. Driscoll from Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr have stepped in to represent Symbotic Inc., an A.I.-enabled technology platform that focuses on increasing supply chain efficiency, and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The case, filed Oct. 2 in Massachusetts District Court by the Brown Law Firm on behalf of Stephen Austen, accuses certain officers and directors of misleading investors in regard to Symbotic's potential for margin growth by failing to disclose that the company was not equipped to timely deploy its systems or manage expenses through project delays. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Nathaniel M. Gorton, is 1:24-cv-12522, Austen v. Cohen et al.
Who Got The Work
Edmund Polubinski and Marie Killmond of Davis Polk & Wardwell have entered appearances for data platform software development company MongoDB and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The action, filed Oct. 7 in New York Southern District Court by the Brown Law Firm, accuses the company's directors and/or officers of falsely expressing confidence in the company’s restructuring of its sales incentive plan and downplaying the severity of decreases in its upfront commitments. The case is 1:24-cv-07594, Roy v. Ittycheria et al.
Who Got The Work
Amy O. Bruchs and Kurt F. Ellison of Michael Best & Friedrich have entered appearances for Epic Systems Corp. in a pending employment discrimination lawsuit. The suit was filed Sept. 7 in Wisconsin Western District Court by Levine Eisberner LLC and Siri & Glimstad on behalf of a project manager who claims that he was wrongfully terminated after applying for a religious exemption to the defendant's COVID-19 vaccine mandate. The case, assigned to U.S. Magistrate Judge Anita Marie Boor, is 3:24-cv-00630, Secker, Nathan v. Epic Systems Corporation.
Who Got The Work
David X. Sullivan, Thomas J. Finn and Gregory A. Hall from McCarter & English have entered appearances for Sunrun Installation Services in a pending civil rights lawsuit. The complaint was filed Sept. 4 in Connecticut District Court by attorney Robert M. Berke on behalf of former employee George Edward Steins, who was arrested and charged with employing an unregistered home improvement salesperson. The complaint alleges that had Sunrun informed the Connecticut Department of Consumer Protection that the plaintiff's employment had ended in 2017 and that he no longer held Sunrun's home improvement contractor license, he would not have been hit with charges, which were dismissed in May 2024. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Jeffrey A. Meyer, is 3:24-cv-01423, Steins v. Sunrun, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Greenberg Traurig shareholder Joshua L. Raskin has entered an appearance for boohoo.com UK Ltd. in a pending patent infringement lawsuit. The suit, filed Sept. 3 in Texas Eastern District Court by Rozier Hardt McDonough on behalf of Alto Dynamics, asserts five patents related to an online shopping platform. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Rodney Gilstrap, is 2:24-cv-00719, Alto Dynamics, LLC v. boohoo.com UK Limited.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250