Expensive F*U: After 7 Years, FIU and FNU Reach $1.1M Settlement in Fight Over Name
"We did not see this case having a happy ending for FIU, and it turned out it did not have a happy ending for them," said Steven Peretz of Peretz Chesal & Herrmann in Miami, who helped defend Florida National University from trademark infringement claims.
January 31, 2020 at 03:10 PM
3 minute read
After almost seven years, 170 pleadings and four mediation sessions, Florida International University has agreed to end its trademark war against rival Florida National University, with a $1.135 million settlement that dissolved the issue of attorney fees.
FIU sued FNU in 2013, alleging its name was too similar. But the lawsuit flopped when U.S. District Judge Kathleen Williams in the Southern District of Florida found no evidence that college applicants ever got the two institutions confused.
Michael Chesal and Steven Peretz of Peretz Chesal & Herrmann in Miami represented FNU and won $1.15 million in attorney fees for their client in August 2019—which FIU opposed and appealed to the Eleventh Circuit.
That appeal proved unpopular among some of FIU's own students, according to an editorial that ran in student newspaper Panther NOW, which called the case a "meritless mess," and compared the plaintiff to "a schoolyard bully picking on a small child."
"The notion that FNU is drawing Panthers away from their den holds no water," the story said. "More than 13 universities in the state have 'Florida' and 'University' in their names and acronyms, some of which are much larger and offer a wider range of degrees than FNU."
FIU and its attorneys Jaime Vining and David Friedland of Friedland Vining in Miami did not immediately respond to requests for comment.
|No happy ending
FIU has agreed to drop that appeal under the settlement agreement, which has already been paid, according to Peretz, who said FNU had an additional fee application for about $134,000 pending before the district court.
"The cost of an appeal to either side would have been anywhere from $100,000 to $200,000, and we told FIU that we were going to seek those attorney fees too if we prevailed before the appellate court, so they had a strong incentive to settle the case," Peretz said.
The agreement came after three failed mediation sessions over several years, but as Peretz put it, "The fourth time was the charm."
Peretz said he was "troubled" by the lawsuit since the day it was filed.
"We saw no overlap in channels of trade between the two universities. and it was frustrating," Peretz said. "We did not see this case having a happy ending for FIU, and it turned out it did not have a happy ending for them."
Read more:
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2024 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllFlorida Supreme Court Paves Way for Attorney Fees Over $100k in Land Dispute
Miami’s Arbitration Week Aims To Cement City’s Status as Dispute Destination
3 minute readHit Song Ignites Multimillion-Dollar Legal Battle in South Florida
Ex-Big Law Attorney Disbarred for Defrauding $1 Million of Client Money
4 minute readTrending Stories
Who Got The Work
Michael G. Bongiorno, Andrew Scott Dulberg and Elizabeth E. Driscoll from Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr have stepped in to represent Symbotic Inc., an A.I.-enabled technology platform that focuses on increasing supply chain efficiency, and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The case, filed Oct. 2 in Massachusetts District Court by the Brown Law Firm on behalf of Stephen Austen, accuses certain officers and directors of misleading investors in regard to Symbotic's potential for margin growth by failing to disclose that the company was not equipped to timely deploy its systems or manage expenses through project delays. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Nathaniel M. Gorton, is 1:24-cv-12522, Austen v. Cohen et al.
Who Got The Work
Edmund Polubinski and Marie Killmond of Davis Polk & Wardwell have entered appearances for data platform software development company MongoDB and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The action, filed Oct. 7 in New York Southern District Court by the Brown Law Firm, accuses the company's directors and/or officers of falsely expressing confidence in the company’s restructuring of its sales incentive plan and downplaying the severity of decreases in its upfront commitments. The case is 1:24-cv-07594, Roy v. Ittycheria et al.
Who Got The Work
Amy O. Bruchs and Kurt F. Ellison of Michael Best & Friedrich have entered appearances for Epic Systems Corp. in a pending employment discrimination lawsuit. The suit was filed Sept. 7 in Wisconsin Western District Court by Levine Eisberner LLC and Siri & Glimstad on behalf of a project manager who claims that he was wrongfully terminated after applying for a religious exemption to the defendant's COVID-19 vaccine mandate. The case, assigned to U.S. Magistrate Judge Anita Marie Boor, is 3:24-cv-00630, Secker, Nathan v. Epic Systems Corporation.
Who Got The Work
David X. Sullivan, Thomas J. Finn and Gregory A. Hall from McCarter & English have entered appearances for Sunrun Installation Services in a pending civil rights lawsuit. The complaint was filed Sept. 4 in Connecticut District Court by attorney Robert M. Berke on behalf of former employee George Edward Steins, who was arrested and charged with employing an unregistered home improvement salesperson. The complaint alleges that had Sunrun informed the Connecticut Department of Consumer Protection that the plaintiff's employment had ended in 2017 and that he no longer held Sunrun's home improvement contractor license, he would not have been hit with charges, which were dismissed in May 2024. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Jeffrey A. Meyer, is 3:24-cv-01423, Steins v. Sunrun, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Greenberg Traurig shareholder Joshua L. Raskin has entered an appearance for boohoo.com UK Ltd. in a pending patent infringement lawsuit. The suit, filed Sept. 3 in Texas Eastern District Court by Rozier Hardt McDonough on behalf of Alto Dynamics, asserts five patents related to an online shopping platform. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Rodney Gilstrap, is 2:24-cv-00719, Alto Dynamics, LLC v. boohoo.com UK Limited.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250