Construction Defects Claimed at 537-Unit Doral Condo
An investor in the development partnership dismissed the allegations as normal for big projects and said he is confident the contractor will address issues.
February 03, 2020 at 02:31 PM
4 minute read
The homeowner association for a Midtown Doral condominium claims construction defects, including leaky plumbing with erratic water pressure, rooftop pools of rainwater on the roof and exposed rebar in cracked concrete.
A member of the development partnership maintains all issues will be worked out and stands by the general contractor hired for the project, saying it had a good track record and insurance.
Midtown Doral at Northwest 107th Avenue and 74th Street was completed in 2016 with four eight-story condo buildings totaling 537 units and 70,000 square feet of retail space.
Midtown Doral Condominium 2 Association Inc. took control of its building at 7751 NW 107th Ave. in 2017. The associating is suing general contractor Delant Construction Co. in Miami, architectural firm Pascual, Perez, Kiliddjian & Associates in Doral and MD Residential II LLC, an affiliate used by the development partnership.
The suit lists breach of implied warranties counts against the developer and general contractor as well as a professional negligence count against the architect.
Association attorney Georg Ketelhohn said the owners sent a notice to the developer and contractor noting an engineering report of defects under the Florida Construction Defect Statute. In response, they agreed to work with the association to fix some of the issues, but others are in dispute.
"We have not been able to fully resolve the issues so we went forward with the litigation," said Ketelhohn, a shareholder at Siegfried Rivera in Coral Gables. He filed suit Dec. 10 in Miami-Dade Circuit Court.
The issues still could be resolved if the defendants agreed to the remaining fixes. Otherwise, the association would solicit bids for repairs and use the amount to determine its demand for reimbursement.
For now, Ketelhohn declined to disclose the engineer's repair estimate or the cost to fix only the disputed defects.
Development partner Sergio Pino said this is within the normal course for big projects and the homeowners merely are taking their available recourse to get items fixed.
Pino said he and others invested in 107 Avenue Doral Properties LLC, a holding company for MD Residential I-IV and the other LLCs that developed portions of the project. Pino's Century Homebuilders Group LLC in Coral Gables developed Midtown Doral phase II.
"If the homeowners aren't satisfied with some of the work, this is the vehicle to get it fixed. We are supportive of the homeowners," he said. "Delant Construction, it's my understanding that they have good insurance for whatever they have to fix, and hopefully it will work out in the end. I do agree with the homeowners. They have to do what they have to do to make sure that the quality that was promised is the quality that was delivered."
Delant Construction attorney Michael Peterson, managing partner at Peterson, Baldor & Maranges in Miami, declined comment.
Pascual Perez attorney Alex Diaz, partner at Klein Glasser Park & Lowe in Miami, also declined comment. In a motion to dismiss, he argued the allegations of negligence by the architect lack specificity.
"The allegations are so bare as to leave PPA unsure as to what specifically they did wrong," Diaz wrote in the motion.
The lawsuit claims the building doesn't meet the state building code, design and construction plans, and industry standards.
The complaint notes issue with soundproofing, unsealed holes exposing corroding metal, some missing fire protection systems, incorrectly sealed joints, an exposed conduit and plumbing leaks staining drywall. Rainwater pools on the roof because it wasn't sloped as outlined in plans.
Records show Delant and the Midtown Doral development companies had previous disputes between each other. Delant sued MD Residential II in 2018, saying it didn't pay Delant all it was owed for work on Midtown Doral condo 2. MD Residential II denied this and countersued, saying Delant didn't complete the building on time, overbilled and needed to correct improper work. The suit was dismissed last year after the two sides filed dismissal stipulations.
Related stories:
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2024 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllHow Much Coverage Do You Really Have? Valuation and Loss Settlement Provisions in Commercial Property Policies
10 minute readThe Importance of 'Speaking Up' Regarding Lease Renewal Deadlines for Commercial Tenants and Landlords
6 minute readMeet the Attorneys—and Little Known Law—Behind $20M Miami Dispute
Trending Stories
- 1'If You Have the Offering, India Is the Shining Star': International Firms on Bolstering Their India Desks
- 2Meet Christopher Benjamin: New Miami-Dade Judge
- 3Are Federal and State Superfund Laws the Best Way to Address Microplastics?
- 4Attorney Can't Invest in Firm With Non-Lawyer Owner?
- 5Former Perkins Coie Partner Moves to Stradley Ronon in Chicago
Who Got The Work
Michael G. Bongiorno, Andrew Scott Dulberg and Elizabeth E. Driscoll from Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr have stepped in to represent Symbotic Inc., an A.I.-enabled technology platform that focuses on increasing supply chain efficiency, and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The case, filed Oct. 2 in Massachusetts District Court by the Brown Law Firm on behalf of Stephen Austen, accuses certain officers and directors of misleading investors in regard to Symbotic's potential for margin growth by failing to disclose that the company was not equipped to timely deploy its systems or manage expenses through project delays. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Nathaniel M. Gorton, is 1:24-cv-12522, Austen v. Cohen et al.
Who Got The Work
Edmund Polubinski and Marie Killmond of Davis Polk & Wardwell have entered appearances for data platform software development company MongoDB and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The action, filed Oct. 7 in New York Southern District Court by the Brown Law Firm, accuses the company's directors and/or officers of falsely expressing confidence in the company’s restructuring of its sales incentive plan and downplaying the severity of decreases in its upfront commitments. The case is 1:24-cv-07594, Roy v. Ittycheria et al.
Who Got The Work
Amy O. Bruchs and Kurt F. Ellison of Michael Best & Friedrich have entered appearances for Epic Systems Corp. in a pending employment discrimination lawsuit. The suit was filed Sept. 7 in Wisconsin Western District Court by Levine Eisberner LLC and Siri & Glimstad on behalf of a project manager who claims that he was wrongfully terminated after applying for a religious exemption to the defendant's COVID-19 vaccine mandate. The case, assigned to U.S. Magistrate Judge Anita Marie Boor, is 3:24-cv-00630, Secker, Nathan v. Epic Systems Corporation.
Who Got The Work
David X. Sullivan, Thomas J. Finn and Gregory A. Hall from McCarter & English have entered appearances for Sunrun Installation Services in a pending civil rights lawsuit. The complaint was filed Sept. 4 in Connecticut District Court by attorney Robert M. Berke on behalf of former employee George Edward Steins, who was arrested and charged with employing an unregistered home improvement salesperson. The complaint alleges that had Sunrun informed the Connecticut Department of Consumer Protection that the plaintiff's employment had ended in 2017 and that he no longer held Sunrun's home improvement contractor license, he would not have been hit with charges, which were dismissed in May 2024. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Jeffrey A. Meyer, is 3:24-cv-01423, Steins v. Sunrun, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Greenberg Traurig shareholder Joshua L. Raskin has entered an appearance for boohoo.com UK Ltd. in a pending patent infringement lawsuit. The suit, filed Sept. 3 in Texas Eastern District Court by Rozier Hardt McDonough on behalf of Alto Dynamics, asserts five patents related to an online shopping platform. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Rodney Gilstrap, is 2:24-cv-00719, Alto Dynamics, LLC v. boohoo.com UK Limited.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250