Florida Judge Reprimanded for Losing Temper, Insulting Defendant
"Although the law required a life sentence based on the jury's recommendation, you made remarks suggesting that the defendant was not worthy," Chief Justice Charles Canady told Brevard Circuit Judge Robin C. Lemonidis.
February 05, 2020 at 12:54 PM
3 minute read
Brevard Circuit Judge Robin C. Lemonidis received a public reprimand from the Florida Supreme Court Wednesday over allegations that she lost her temper in a trial and used a sentencing colloquy to voice a desire to see the defendant fight for his life or die in prison.
Florida Supreme Court Chief Justice Charles Canady said the judge had damaged the public's trust and confidence in the judiciary.
"Instead of showing the patience required a judge, you assumed an aggressive, adversarial tone and demeanor," Canady said. "You loudly struck your gavel, you made facial gestures and you took other actions to show your annoyance. Your behavior reached a point that a juror in the trial commented on your perceived dislike of the defense counsel."
Canady said that comment from the juror should have prompted Lemonidis to reign in her behavior, but it did not.
Lemonidis found herself in hot water after failing to address participants in State v. Skyler Francis by their surnames, and using adversarial facial expressions, tone and demeanor toward the attorney and his client. The judge "repeatedly and loudly struck her gavel" while admonishing the defense at least five times, according to a high court ruling.
The Judicial Qualifications Commission accused the judge in August 2019 of violating Judicial Canons 1, 2A, 3B(4) and 3B(5), which govern integrity and independence of the judiciary, the appearance of impropriety and adjudicative responsibilities.
In another case, State v. Anthony Welch, the defendant was facing the death penalty in a retrial of the penalty phase after pleading guilty to two counts of first-degree murder. After listening to impact statements from victims' family members, Lemonidis told the defendant she "cannot disagree with a single thing" one person said, and that, among other things, "I do hope you do fight for your life every minute of every day. And that would be the only reason that I would hope your life is any longer than six weeks."
Canady said Lemonidis' "insults and abuse" toward the defendant degraded the solemnity of sentencing proceedings.
"Although the law required a life sentence based on the jury's recommendation, you made remarks suggesting that the defendant was not worthy," Canady said. "You commented on the defendant's 'miserable life' and then you said that you hoped the defendant would fight for his life every minute of every day."
Related story: 'Your Life is Not Worthy': Reprimand for Florida Judge Over Treatment of Defendants
Lemonidis has agreed to stress-management counseling and admitted that her conduct was inappropriate—gestures Canady acknowledged. Lemonidis thanked the justices before leaving the courtroom.
Lemonidis and her attorney Warren Lindsey of Lindsey & Ferry in Winter Park did not immediately respond to a request for comment.
Read more:
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2025 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllTrump Media Accuses Purchaser Rep of Extortion, Harassment After Merger
4 minute readTrending Stories
- 1Data Breach Lawsuit Against Byte Federal Among 1,500 Targeting Companies in 2024
- 2Counterfeiters Ride Surge in Tabletop Games’ Popularity, Challenging IP Owners to Keep Up
- 3Health Care Data Breach Class Actions Saw December Surge in NY Courts
- 4Florida Supreme Court Disbars 3, Suspends 11, Reprimands 1 in Final Disciplinary Order of 2024
- 5Chief Justice Roberts Ends Year With Defense Against 'Illegitimate' Attacks on Judiciary
Who Got The Work
Michael G. Bongiorno, Andrew Scott Dulberg and Elizabeth E. Driscoll from Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr have stepped in to represent Symbotic Inc., an A.I.-enabled technology platform that focuses on increasing supply chain efficiency, and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The case, filed Oct. 2 in Massachusetts District Court by the Brown Law Firm on behalf of Stephen Austen, accuses certain officers and directors of misleading investors in regard to Symbotic's potential for margin growth by failing to disclose that the company was not equipped to timely deploy its systems or manage expenses through project delays. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Nathaniel M. Gorton, is 1:24-cv-12522, Austen v. Cohen et al.
Who Got The Work
Edmund Polubinski and Marie Killmond of Davis Polk & Wardwell have entered appearances for data platform software development company MongoDB and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The action, filed Oct. 7 in New York Southern District Court by the Brown Law Firm, accuses the company's directors and/or officers of falsely expressing confidence in the company’s restructuring of its sales incentive plan and downplaying the severity of decreases in its upfront commitments. The case is 1:24-cv-07594, Roy v. Ittycheria et al.
Who Got The Work
Amy O. Bruchs and Kurt F. Ellison of Michael Best & Friedrich have entered appearances for Epic Systems Corp. in a pending employment discrimination lawsuit. The suit was filed Sept. 7 in Wisconsin Western District Court by Levine Eisberner LLC and Siri & Glimstad on behalf of a project manager who claims that he was wrongfully terminated after applying for a religious exemption to the defendant's COVID-19 vaccine mandate. The case, assigned to U.S. Magistrate Judge Anita Marie Boor, is 3:24-cv-00630, Secker, Nathan v. Epic Systems Corporation.
Who Got The Work
David X. Sullivan, Thomas J. Finn and Gregory A. Hall from McCarter & English have entered appearances for Sunrun Installation Services in a pending civil rights lawsuit. The complaint was filed Sept. 4 in Connecticut District Court by attorney Robert M. Berke on behalf of former employee George Edward Steins, who was arrested and charged with employing an unregistered home improvement salesperson. The complaint alleges that had Sunrun informed the Connecticut Department of Consumer Protection that the plaintiff's employment had ended in 2017 and that he no longer held Sunrun's home improvement contractor license, he would not have been hit with charges, which were dismissed in May 2024. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Jeffrey A. Meyer, is 3:24-cv-01423, Steins v. Sunrun, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Greenberg Traurig shareholder Joshua L. Raskin has entered an appearance for boohoo.com UK Ltd. in a pending patent infringement lawsuit. The suit, filed Sept. 3 in Texas Eastern District Court by Rozier Hardt McDonough on behalf of Alto Dynamics, asserts five patents related to an online shopping platform. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Rodney Gilstrap, is 2:24-cv-00719, Alto Dynamics, LLC v. boohoo.com UK Limited.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250