An opinion affirming one of the nation’s leading federal student loan guaranty agencies isn’t liable for its aggressive tactics trying to collect a nonexistent debt ignited the second textualist split in a week at the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit.

The ruling written by Circuit Judge William Pryor provoked a strong dissent from fellow Circuit Judge Beverly Martin, who chastised Pryor and D.C. Circuit Judge Gregory Katsas. He joined Pryor in affirming dismissal of the case against the Pennsylvania Higher Education Assistance Agency.

This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.

To view this content, please continue to their sites.

Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now

Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now

Why am I seeing this?

LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law are third party online distributors of the broad collection of current and archived versions of ALM's legal news publications. LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law customers are able to access and use ALM's content, including content from the National Law Journal, The American Lawyer, Legaltech News, The New York Law Journal, and Corporate Counsel, as well as other sources of legal information.

For questions call 1-877-256-2472 or contact us at [email protected]