For Businesses Suffering From Coronavirus Losses, Insurance Coverage May Offer a Remedy
As a hub for international travel and tourism, South Florida businesses are hardly immune from the economic consequences of this epidemic.
February 12, 2020 at 01:33 PM
6 minute read
The World Health Organization has designated the outbreak of the 2019 Novel Coronavirus, dubbed Covid-19 on Tuesday, an international public health emergency. The outbreak is not confined by national borders and increasingly looks like a pandemic, with more than 1,300 people dead and 64,000-plus infected across 26 countries.
Hundreds of Americans have been evacuated from China, and the U.S. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention has issued a Level 3 travel warning, advising that all nonessential travel to China be avoided due to the ongoing outbreak.
As a hub for international travel and tourism, South Florida businesses are hardly immune from the economic consequences of this epidemic. Around the world, travel and events have been postponed or canceled and supply chains have been disrupted.
For example, 10% of the worldwide supply of flat panels for televisions and other electronic devices are manufactured in Wuhan, China (the virus' epicenter), suggesting an imminent impact on electronics manufacturing. Automaker Hyundai announced that it will idle plants in South Korea due to a shortage of components. Starbucks announced the closure of more than 2,000 cafes in China, while McDonald's has closed 300 stores in China's Hubei province.
Just as South Florida had to deal with the impact of the Zika virus several years ago, the financial toll is mounting and affected businesses are looking for ways to offset losses. Insurance may provide a source of relief, and a variety of coverages may respond for losses associated with the outbreak.
Business Interruption and Supply Chain Disruptions
Business disruptions due to the coronavirus can create financial problems for policyholders. Commercial property insurance policies cover losses of business income, but frequently require some type of physical damage to covered property. In certain instances, coverage may be available where the interruption is due to other causes, such as orders from a civil authority.
For instance, access to the insured's business may be prohibited by federal emergency management directives, such as those provided under the Stafford Act, the Homeland Security Act of 2002 and the National Incident Management System. Even where the insured business is interrupted from a civil authority order, however, many property insurance policies require that the civil authority order result from some physical damage to property.
Importantly, the law is not settled on what constitutes a "physical loss," as cases throughout the country hold that contamination and other incidents that render property uninhabitable or unfit for its intended use are sufficient. Whether there is "physical loss" must be determined on a case-by-case basis under the facts and applicable policy language.
Event Cancellation Insurance
Many businesses and organizations hosting events, particularly those involving attendees, performers, or presenters from China may cancel or postpone events due to concerns about the coronavirus. Impacted businesses may be able to recover under event cancellation insurance policies for, among other things, lost profits and revenue, amounts paid to reimburse vendors, ticket holders or other third parties due to the canceled event, and additional amounts that must be spent to host the event at an alternate time or place.
Coverage is also potentially available for out-of-pocket or unexpected costs, lost advertising, lost ticket sales or other contractual obligations a business must pay as a result of the canceled event. But policyholders must still be on the lookout for policy exclusions for communicable diseases and restrictions limiting coverage to necessary cancellations due to a government order.
General Liability Insurance
Commercial general liability insurance policies provide coverage for liability to third parties for bodily injury and property damage, as well as claims concerning privacy and other personal injuries. With thousands suffering bodily injury due to the coronavirus, the procedures that businesses implement to warn and protect against exposure to the coronavirus may become a potential liability.
For example, retail, travel, entertainment and hospitality businesses may face claims by customers alleging that the companies were negligent in failing to warn of or protect against the risk of exposure to the outbreak. These businesses may look to their CGL policies to provide coverage for such claims. Insurers may seek to rely on exclusions for exposure to viruses, bacteria, or pollutants, but such exclusions must be evaluated on an individual basis. A myriad of arguments are available to policyholders to overcome these provisions.
D&O Insurance
In addition to third-party claims targeting businesses directly, a company's directors and officers may be subjected to shareholder suits alleging that unreasonable actions (or inaction) in response to the coronavirus caused the company economic loss. For example, federal securities laws may require certain disclosures by publicly held companies potentially affected by the spread of the coronavirus.
As a result, there is a risk that shareholders may allege executives and management failed to disclose risks posed by the coronavirus to the business' financial performance, failed to observe protocols recommended by authorities, or failed to develop adequate contingency plans. Directors and officers insurance policies may provide coverage for these types of costs and liabilities.
Although such policies generally exclude claims for bodily injury, such exclusions should not preclude coverage for shareholders' economic loss claims that allegedly stem from management-level decisions. As with other potentially implicated coverage, the availability of coverage may turn on the precise wording of the policies at issue.
No matter the type of insurance policy under which a business seeks coverage for coronavirus-related losses, coverage will depend on the specific policy language and factual circumstances at issue. Policy conditions, such as the timing of notice to the insurer, should be carefully evaluated as events develop. For businesses suffering losses and looking to navigate or obtain coverage for the coronavirus, having experienced coverage counsel can be invaluable.
Walter J. Andrews is a partner at Hunton Andrews Kurth in Miami. His practice focuses on complex insurance litigation, counseling and reinsurance arbitrations and expert witness testimony. He may be reached at [email protected].
Cary D. Steklof is an associate at the firm. He represents individual, corporate and municipal policyholders in all types of first- and third-party insurance coverage and bad faith disputes. He may be reached at [email protected].
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2025 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllDon’t Forget the Owner’s Manual: A Guide to Proving Liability Through Manufacturers’ Warnings and Instructions
5 minute readLeveraging the Power of Local Chambers of Commerce: A Second-Career Lawyer’s Guide to Building a Thriving Practice
5 minute readLaw Firms Mentioned
Trending Stories
- 1US DOJ Threatens to Prosecute Local Officials Who Don't Aid Immigration Enforcement
- 2Kirkland Is Entering a New Market. Will Its Rates Get a Warm Welcome?
- 3African Law Firm Investigated Over ‘AI-Generated’ Case References
- 4Gen AI and Associate Legal Writing: Davis Wright Tremaine's New Training Model
- 5Departing Attorneys Sue Their Former Law Firm
Who Got The Work
J. Brugh Lower of Gibbons has entered an appearance for industrial equipment supplier Devco Corporation in a pending trademark infringement lawsuit. The suit, accusing the defendant of selling knock-off Graco products, was filed Dec. 18 in New Jersey District Court by Rivkin Radler on behalf of Graco Inc. and Graco Minnesota. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Zahid N. Quraishi, is 3:24-cv-11294, Graco Inc. et al v. Devco Corporation.
Who Got The Work
Rebecca Maller-Stein and Kent A. Yalowitz of Arnold & Porter Kaye Scholer have entered their appearances for Hanaco Venture Capital and its executives, Lior Prosor and David Frankel, in a pending securities lawsuit. The action, filed on Dec. 24 in New York Southern District Court by Zell, Aron & Co. on behalf of Goldeneye Advisors, accuses the defendants of negligently and fraudulently managing the plaintiff's $1 million investment. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Vernon S. Broderick, is 1:24-cv-09918, Goldeneye Advisors, LLC v. Hanaco Venture Capital, Ltd. et al.
Who Got The Work
Attorneys from A&O Shearman has stepped in as defense counsel for Toronto-Dominion Bank and other defendants in a pending securities class action. The suit, filed Dec. 11 in New York Southern District Court by Bleichmar Fonti & Auld, accuses the defendants of concealing the bank's 'pervasive' deficiencies in regards to its compliance with the Bank Secrecy Act and the quality of its anti-money laundering controls. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Arun Subramanian, is 1:24-cv-09445, Gonzalez v. The Toronto-Dominion Bank et al.
Who Got The Work
Crown Castle International, a Pennsylvania company providing shared communications infrastructure, has turned to Luke D. Wolf of Gordon Rees Scully Mansukhani to fend off a pending breach-of-contract lawsuit. The court action, filed Nov. 25 in Michigan Eastern District Court by Hooper Hathaway PC on behalf of The Town Residences LLC, accuses Crown Castle of failing to transfer approximately $30,000 in utility payments from T-Mobile in breach of a roof-top lease and assignment agreement. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Susan K. Declercq, is 2:24-cv-13131, The Town Residences LLC v. T-Mobile US, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Wilfred P. Coronato and Daniel M. Schwartz of McCarter & English have stepped in as defense counsel to Electrolux Home Products Inc. in a pending product liability lawsuit. The court action, filed Nov. 26 in New York Eastern District Court by Poulos Lopiccolo PC and Nagel Rice LLP on behalf of David Stern, alleges that the defendant's refrigerators’ drawers and shelving repeatedly break and fall apart within months after purchase. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Joan M. Azrack, is 2:24-cv-08204, Stern v. Electrolux Home Products, Inc.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250