$2.5M Miami Verdict—With No Punitive Damages—Hints at Tricky Tobacco Case
Smoker Gil Cuddihee had reached out to cigarette manufacturers Philip Morris twice before he died of lung cancer. Plaintiffs counsel Randy Rosenblum argued this showed the customer's reliance on what the company had to say about its products.
February 14, 2020 at 03:25 PM
7 minute read
Randy Rosenblum of Dolan Dobrinsky Rosenblum in Miami teamed with Jacksonville lawyers Richard Lantinberg and Allen Jay Plotkin of The Wilner Firm to hit tobacco corporation Philip Morris USA Inc. with a $2.5 million verdict for the daughter of a smoker who died in 1994.
But despite the victory, the case demonstrates what some attorneys say is jurors' prejudice against smokers. With no punitive damages awarded, it shows plaintiffs lawyers face an uphill battle in front of jurors.
The litigation centered on single father Gil Cuddihee, who was 41 when he died of lung cancer, leaving his 13-year-old daughter Sabrina heartbroken.
But the plaintiff's team had their work cut out for them, as Cuddihee had smoked heavily, made few attempts to quit and, in a shocking twist, jurors decided against punitive damages.
Cuddihee, born in the 1950s, picked up his first cigarette as a teen and ultimately blew through almost three packs a day. After starting off with filtered cigarettes, Cuddihee switched to a Philip Morris brand called Merit, which was marketed as a low-tar, enriched with a tobacco-flavor that tasted the same as or better than high-tar products.
The Merit brand piqued Cuddihee's interest in the 1980s—so much so that he enrolled in a promotion called "the Merit challenge" after picking up a Philip Morris postcard from a retail store. And sure enough, Philip Morris' records showed that Cuddihee got in touch to take part in the challenge, which asked smokers to switch from their current brand to Merit, an allegedly healthier alternative.
"This is a guy who bought in, who completely believed it," Rosenblum said. "We know that he actually believed that the Merit cigarettes he was smoking were better for him because he told multiple people that. He told his daughter, he told his brother, he told his ex-wife and he also reached out directly to Philip Morris."
Cuddihee also filled out a survey shortly before his death, giving Philip Morris his name, personal information, favorite brand.
It's unusual to have that sort of evidence in a tobacco case, according to Rosenblum.
"That evidence is very powerful because it really shows the extent to which the smoker really was interested in what the manufacturer had to say, was interested in what the manufacturer was doing and really relied, to his detriment, on the statements that were being made in this case by Philip Morris about its products."
While Philip Morris conceded that smoking had caused Cuddihee's death, it claimed he enjoyed smoking and had no intention of quitting, even after his father died of lung cancer. Rosenblum countered that by pointing to the team of psychologists, scientists and marketers Philip Morris had hired amid an industrywide conspiracy to prevent consumers from learning about the dangers of smoking.
Expert Michael Cummings testified that Cuddihee was addicted to nicotine and showed jurors internal documents depicting Philip Morris studying the habits of Merit smokers.
"They commented internally about the fact that Merit smokers were people who were more health-conscious, so this is something they knew," Rosenblum said. "Switching to light cigarettes is a method of quitting, because when a person switches to lights they also believe that it will help them stop, which is something he expressed to his brother."
Rosenblum encouraged jurors to look beyond health warnings on cigarette packs, to words like "filter," "low tar" and "lights." An internal Philip Morris video bolstered that point, as it featured a researcher who said consumers can became numb once exposed to many different packaging warnings.
"Even Philip Morris knew that smokers didn't always pay attention to the warnings," Rosenblum said. "And you can't discount the fact that, while the warnings are on the packs, there are other words on the packs themselves which smokers are exposed to, which can shape their thinking."
Defense attorneys Hassia Diolombi of Shook, Hardy & Bacon in Miami and Keri Arnold of Arnold & Porter Kaye Scholer in New York did not respond to a request for comment by deadline, but they have moved to throw out the verdict.
No punishment
Though jurors agreed to sit through a punitive damages phase, they ultimately awarded none, and Rosenblum can only speculate as to why.
"It's possible they were persuaded by the presentation by Philip Morris in the second phase. It's possible that this was a jury that was never really going to award punitive damages," Rosenblum said. "Maybe they were just interested to sort of hear what was going to be said but they didn't really have much of an intention. But it's impossible to know."
As with any tobacco case, Rosenblum found it wasn't easy to overcome the general prejudice jurors tend to have against smokers.
"A lot of people feel like, 'Hey, you make a decision to smoke, you should know it's bad for you, and if you get sick it's your fault,' " he said.
Best friends
Cuddihee and his wife had divorced by the 1990s, so the only survivor able to bring a lawsuit on his behalf was his daughter, who, Rosenblum argued, was severely impacted by his death.
"He really raised her, and I don't think there was any dispute in the case that they had an incredibly close relationship," Rosenblum said. "She described him as her best friend, and we were able to show the jury a lot of photographs of the two of them together."
It's unusual for a personal representative to be so young, in Rosenblum's experience, as parents tend to die of smoking-related illnesses when their children are adults.
"In this case, I don't think Sabrina had even reached her 40th birthday by the time of the trial," Rosenblum said.
Sabrina Cuddihee's testimony was particularly impactful, in Rosenblum's view, as she told jurors how her father used to sing the song, "You Are My Sunshine" to her.
"After she became a parent, which, of course, he never lived to see, she would sing that same song to her kids to calm them down," Rosenblum said.
Sabrina Cuddihee also recalled how, toward the end of her father's life, they went to the Walt Disney World Resort with the help of the Make-A-Wish Foundation. And there, Cuddihee arranged a special surprise.
"All she (Sabrina) wanted was a Mickey Mouse watch," Rosenblum said. "And while she was out doing something else or wasn't paying attention, he went in and bought her a Mickey Mouse watch, had it engraved from him and it was given to her after he died."
Case: Gil Cuddihee v. Philip Morris
Case No.: 2008CA000398
Description: Engle progeny
Filing date: Sept. 1, 2008
Verdict date: Jan. 17, 2020
Judge: Duval Circuit Judge Katie Dearing
Plaintiffs attorneys: Randy Rosenblum, Dolan Dobrinsky Rosenblum, Miami; Richard Lantinberg and Allen Jay Plotkin,The Wilner Firm, Jacksonville
Defense attorneys: Hassia Diomlobi, Shook, Hardy & Bacon, Miami; Keri Arnold, Arnold & Porter Kaye Scholer, New York
Verdict amount: $2.5 million
More verdicts:
'Somebody Tried to Kill Him': 2 Miami Lawyers, a Hit Man, the FBI and a $17M Verdict
Pictures Worth $2 Million: South Florida Lawyers Leverage CT Scan to Negotiate Settlement
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2025 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllMillion-Dollar Verdict: Broward Jury Sides With Small Business
Automaker Pleads Guilty and Agrees to $1.6 Billion in Payouts
'I've Seen Terrible Things': Lawyer Predicts Spike in Hazing Suits
Law Firms Mentioned
Trending Stories
- 1Uber Files RICO Suit Against Plaintiff-Side Firms Alleging Fraudulent Injury Claims
- 2The Law Firm Disrupted: Scrutinizing the Elephant More Than the Mouse
- 3Inherent Diminished Value Damages Unavailable to 3rd-Party Claimants, Court Says
- 4Pa. Defense Firm Sued by Client Over Ex-Eagles Player's $43.5M Med Mal Win
- 5Losses Mount at Morris Manning, but Departing Ex-Chair Stays Bullish About His Old Firm's Future
Who Got The Work
J. Brugh Lower of Gibbons has entered an appearance for industrial equipment supplier Devco Corporation in a pending trademark infringement lawsuit. The suit, accusing the defendant of selling knock-off Graco products, was filed Dec. 18 in New Jersey District Court by Rivkin Radler on behalf of Graco Inc. and Graco Minnesota. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Zahid N. Quraishi, is 3:24-cv-11294, Graco Inc. et al v. Devco Corporation.
Who Got The Work
Rebecca Maller-Stein and Kent A. Yalowitz of Arnold & Porter Kaye Scholer have entered their appearances for Hanaco Venture Capital and its executives, Lior Prosor and David Frankel, in a pending securities lawsuit. The action, filed on Dec. 24 in New York Southern District Court by Zell, Aron & Co. on behalf of Goldeneye Advisors, accuses the defendants of negligently and fraudulently managing the plaintiff's $1 million investment. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Vernon S. Broderick, is 1:24-cv-09918, Goldeneye Advisors, LLC v. Hanaco Venture Capital, Ltd. et al.
Who Got The Work
Attorneys from A&O Shearman has stepped in as defense counsel for Toronto-Dominion Bank and other defendants in a pending securities class action. The suit, filed Dec. 11 in New York Southern District Court by Bleichmar Fonti & Auld, accuses the defendants of concealing the bank's 'pervasive' deficiencies in regards to its compliance with the Bank Secrecy Act and the quality of its anti-money laundering controls. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Arun Subramanian, is 1:24-cv-09445, Gonzalez v. The Toronto-Dominion Bank et al.
Who Got The Work
Crown Castle International, a Pennsylvania company providing shared communications infrastructure, has turned to Luke D. Wolf of Gordon Rees Scully Mansukhani to fend off a pending breach-of-contract lawsuit. The court action, filed Nov. 25 in Michigan Eastern District Court by Hooper Hathaway PC on behalf of The Town Residences LLC, accuses Crown Castle of failing to transfer approximately $30,000 in utility payments from T-Mobile in breach of a roof-top lease and assignment agreement. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Susan K. Declercq, is 2:24-cv-13131, The Town Residences LLC v. T-Mobile US, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Wilfred P. Coronato and Daniel M. Schwartz of McCarter & English have stepped in as defense counsel to Electrolux Home Products Inc. in a pending product liability lawsuit. The court action, filed Nov. 26 in New York Eastern District Court by Poulos Lopiccolo PC and Nagel Rice LLP on behalf of David Stern, alleges that the defendant's refrigerators’ drawers and shelving repeatedly break and fall apart within months after purchase. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Joan M. Azrack, is 2:24-cv-08204, Stern v. Electrolux Home Products, Inc.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250