Greenberg Traurig on Novartis List of Preferred Law Firms for Diversity Staffing
Firms on the Switzerland-based pharmaceutical company's list have committed to meet strict staffing and billing requirements.
February 14, 2020 at 04:58 PM
4 minute read
The original version of this story was published on Corporate Counsel
Florida's homegrown Greenberg Traurig is on a preferred list of global law firms meeting Novartis AG's strict staffing requirements designed to create a more diverse legal profession.
This is the third iteration of the Switzerland-based pharmaceutical company's preferred panel based on diversity and inclusion efforts.
The other firms are: Alston & Bird; Arnold & Porter Kaye Scholer; Bird & Bird; Brinks Gilson Lione; Freshfields Bruckhaus Deringer; Gibson, Dunn & Crutcher; Goodwin Procter; Hogan Lovells; Kirkland & Ellis; Latham & Watkins; Linklaters; Mayer Brown; Morgan, Lewis & Bockius; Morrison & Foerster; Munger, Tolles & Olson; O'Melveny & Myers; Sullivan & Cromwell; Troutman Sanders; Williams & Connolly; Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr; and Womble Bond Dickinson.
The 22 firms have committed to having no less than 30% of billable associate time and 20% of partner time "provided by females, racially/ethnically diverse professionals or members of the LGBTQ+ community. If a firm does not hold up to that staffing commitment for a particular matter, Novartis will withhold 15% of the total amount billed over the 'life of that specific matter.' "
Shannon Thyme Klinger, group general counsel at Novartis, said in an email interview that the participating firms " see this initiative as a catalyst to drive further positive change within their own organizations."
Lori Cohen, vice chair of Greenberg Traurig in Atlanta, said the firm is honored to be a part of the panel.
"We believe Novartis' 3.0 will have a significant, lasting impact on the legal profession, and we applaud Shannon Klinger and Novartis leadership for this visionary, groundbreaking program," Cohen said.
Saul Morgenstern, a partner at Arnold & Porter in New York, said Klinger has taken Novartis' commitment to diversity and inclusion to a new level. He said his firm has been helping train diverse associates for years to prepare them for partner promotions.
"When Shannon's newest version of the program came across the wires, we were pleased because it dovetails nicely with our firm's culture and our firm's ethics," Morgenstern said.
He said Arnold & Porter often meets or exceeds the diversity requirements set out by Novartis and other clients.
Mary Ellen Connerty, director of diversity and engagement at O'Melveny & Myers in New York, said in an email that clients like Novartis help drive change for the better.
They "play a powerful role in driving law firms to become more diverse and inclusive. Like Novartis, we know that diverse and inclusive teams do the best work for our clients and are essential to our firm's future," Connerty said.
She said O'Melveny also uses artificial intelligence tools including Pymetrics to eliminate implicit bias in hiring.
Other firms on the panel said the preferred firm program will help move the needle forward on diversity and inclusion in the legal profession.
The Novartis program "aligns with our collaboration with the Move the Needle Fund, recognition as a 'Mansfield Certified Plus' firm by Diversity Lab and our deep commitment to creating a more diverse and inclusive legal profession," Elizabeth Holland, a senior partner in Goodwin's intellectual property litigation group in New York, said in a statement.
Alice Valder Curran, head of Hogan Lovells' global regulatory practice group in Washington, said the company's staffing requirements "are aligned with our own strategy to provide better client experiences through diverse and inclusive teams."
The legal department at Novartis will track the metrics of ongoing matters. Klinger explained the technology will alert the legal department and law firms if hours billed by diverse partners and associates "fall below agreed commitments."
Klinger said the preferred panel program will be evaluated on a continuous basis, and "where gaps are identified, new firms will be added."
Novartis' latest panel has more firms. Klinger said the company previously had a preferred panel of 10 generalist firms. The firms on the new panel "serve in specific legal verticals."
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2024 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllFlorida-Based Law Firms Start to Lag, As New York Takes a Bigger Piece of Deals
3 minute readMorgan & Morgan Looks to Grow Into Complex Litigation While Still Keeping its Billboards Up
6 minute readLost in the Legal Maze: How State Regulations Are Hindering Hemp Operators' Success
7 minute readLaw Firms Mentioned
- Hogan Lovells
- Goodwin Procter
- Linklaters
- Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr LLP
- Freshfields Bruckhaus Deringer
- Latham & Watkins
- Wombel Bond Dickinson
- Brinks Hofer Gilson
- Munger, Tolles & Olson
- Gibson, Dunn & Crutcher
- Troutman Sanders
- Morgan, Lewis & Bockius
- Kirkland & Ellis
- Mayer Brown
- Greenberg Traurig
Trending Stories
- 1When Police Destroy Property, Is It a 'Taking'? Maybe So, Say Sotomayor, Gorsuch
- 2New York Top Court Says Clickwrap Assent Binds Plaintiff's Personal-Injury Claim to Arbitration in Uber Case
- 3'You Can’t Do a First Draft of Common Sense': Microsoft GC Jon Palmer Talks AI, Litigation, and Leadership
- 4About the Awards: Southeastern Legal Awards Q&A with Regional Managing Editor Michael Marciano
- 5Private Credit Boom: Miami’s Role as a Financial and Litigation Hub
Who Got The Work
Michael G. Bongiorno, Andrew Scott Dulberg and Elizabeth E. Driscoll from Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr have stepped in to represent Symbotic Inc., an A.I.-enabled technology platform that focuses on increasing supply chain efficiency, and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The case, filed Oct. 2 in Massachusetts District Court by the Brown Law Firm on behalf of Stephen Austen, accuses certain officers and directors of misleading investors in regard to Symbotic's potential for margin growth by failing to disclose that the company was not equipped to timely deploy its systems or manage expenses through project delays. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Nathaniel M. Gorton, is 1:24-cv-12522, Austen v. Cohen et al.
Who Got The Work
Edmund Polubinski and Marie Killmond of Davis Polk & Wardwell have entered appearances for data platform software development company MongoDB and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The action, filed Oct. 7 in New York Southern District Court by the Brown Law Firm, accuses the company's directors and/or officers of falsely expressing confidence in the company’s restructuring of its sales incentive plan and downplaying the severity of decreases in its upfront commitments. The case is 1:24-cv-07594, Roy v. Ittycheria et al.
Who Got The Work
Amy O. Bruchs and Kurt F. Ellison of Michael Best & Friedrich have entered appearances for Epic Systems Corp. in a pending employment discrimination lawsuit. The suit was filed Sept. 7 in Wisconsin Western District Court by Levine Eisberner LLC and Siri & Glimstad on behalf of a project manager who claims that he was wrongfully terminated after applying for a religious exemption to the defendant's COVID-19 vaccine mandate. The case, assigned to U.S. Magistrate Judge Anita Marie Boor, is 3:24-cv-00630, Secker, Nathan v. Epic Systems Corporation.
Who Got The Work
David X. Sullivan, Thomas J. Finn and Gregory A. Hall from McCarter & English have entered appearances for Sunrun Installation Services in a pending civil rights lawsuit. The complaint was filed Sept. 4 in Connecticut District Court by attorney Robert M. Berke on behalf of former employee George Edward Steins, who was arrested and charged with employing an unregistered home improvement salesperson. The complaint alleges that had Sunrun informed the Connecticut Department of Consumer Protection that the plaintiff's employment had ended in 2017 and that he no longer held Sunrun's home improvement contractor license, he would not have been hit with charges, which were dismissed in May 2024. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Jeffrey A. Meyer, is 3:24-cv-01423, Steins v. Sunrun, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Greenberg Traurig shareholder Joshua L. Raskin has entered an appearance for boohoo.com UK Ltd. in a pending patent infringement lawsuit. The suit, filed Sept. 3 in Texas Eastern District Court by Rozier Hardt McDonough on behalf of Alto Dynamics, asserts five patents related to an online shopping platform. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Rodney Gilstrap, is 2:24-cv-00719, Alto Dynamics, LLC v. boohoo.com UK Limited.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250