Florida Lawmakers to Ban Discrimination in Organ Transplants
The process of seeking a transplant is stressful, and disabled patients who are denied organs may not even realize they were illegally discriminated against.
February 20, 2020 at 12:49 PM
4 minute read
Florida's Legislature is moving toward ensuring new protections for disabled people who may need organ transplants, part of a national trend among states.
The proposals would formally ban insurance companies and others from denying transplants for anyone with physical or mental disabilities. Committees in the House and Senate unanimously approved bills on the subject last week.
Twelve states, including California, Maryland and New Jersey, already have such laws in place, according to the New York-based National Down Syndrome Society. Florida is one of eight states with pending legislation. Roughly 112,500 people in the U.S. are awaiting organ transplants.
Many organ transplant centers have policies that bar or caution against placing people with HIV, psychiatric disabilities or intellectual and developmental disabilities on waiting lists to receive an organ transplant, according to a 2019 report for President Donald Trump by the National Council for Disabilities.
The rights of people with physical and intellectual disabilities are already protected under the Americans with Disabilities Act, but the council's report said doctors and organ transplant centers are often unaware that the law applies to the organ transplant process. It found continued problems even in states that have passed laws such as the one being considered in Florida.
Last year, for example, federal regulators settled a complaint against the University of North Carolina health care system involving a staff doctor who determined a patient was not a good candidate for heart transplant because of the patient's developmental learning disabilities and because the patient did not live independently.
"Every life is precious, and no one should be blocked from access to an organ transplant because of stereotypes about persons with disabilities," Roger Severino, the director of the Office of Civil Rights for the U.S. Health and Human Services Department said in a statement.
The process of seeking a transplant is stressful, and disabled patients who are denied organs may not even realize they were illegally discriminated against.
"They are discouraged, and sometimes they have been told that they don't qualify multiple times," said Dee Alexander, a senior aide to Florida Sen. Aaron Bean, R-Jacksonville, who sponsored one of the bills. "Most people don't go back. They are just so frustrated and exhausted from the process that they don't go back."
Some social and environmental factors are considered during the process of deciding who receives a donated organ, said Michelle Gilchrist, chief executive officer of the National Foundation for Transplants, based in the Memphis, Tennessee. But it would be biased to decide not to give someone with Down syndrome an organ because they may have a lower life expectancy, she said.
Georgia is considering a similar bill called Gracie's Law, named after the infant daughter of nurse Erin Nobles of Louisville, Georgia, whose daughter was born with Down syndrome. Another supporter of that bill is Stephanie Meredith, medical outreach director at the University of Kentucky's Human Development Institute and mother of a 20-year-old, Andy, who also has Down syndrome.
Meredith said Andy's disability could be used to prevent him from receiving a transplant if he ever needs one.
"The idea of denying anyone a transplant when they could be successful, based on perception about their quality of life, is discriminatory," Meredith said.
Everitt Rosen reports for Fresh Take Florida, a news service of the University of Florida.
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2025 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllRFK Jr. Will Keep Affiliations With Morgan & Morgan, Other Law Firms If Confirmed to DHHS
3 minute readAttorneys, Health Care Officials Face Nearly $80M RICO Suit Over Allegedly Fabricated Spreadsheet
Amid Growing Litigation Volume, Don't Expect UnitedHealthcare to Change Its Stripes After CEO's Killing
6 minute readTrending Stories
Who Got The Work
J. Brugh Lower of Gibbons has entered an appearance for industrial equipment supplier Devco Corporation in a pending trademark infringement lawsuit. The suit, accusing the defendant of selling knock-off Graco products, was filed Dec. 18 in New Jersey District Court by Rivkin Radler on behalf of Graco Inc. and Graco Minnesota. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Zahid N. Quraishi, is 3:24-cv-11294, Graco Inc. et al v. Devco Corporation.
Who Got The Work
Rebecca Maller-Stein and Kent A. Yalowitz of Arnold & Porter Kaye Scholer have entered their appearances for Hanaco Venture Capital and its executives, Lior Prosor and David Frankel, in a pending securities lawsuit. The action, filed on Dec. 24 in New York Southern District Court by Zell, Aron & Co. on behalf of Goldeneye Advisors, accuses the defendants of negligently and fraudulently managing the plaintiff's $1 million investment. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Vernon S. Broderick, is 1:24-cv-09918, Goldeneye Advisors, LLC v. Hanaco Venture Capital, Ltd. et al.
Who Got The Work
Attorneys from A&O Shearman has stepped in as defense counsel for Toronto-Dominion Bank and other defendants in a pending securities class action. The suit, filed Dec. 11 in New York Southern District Court by Bleichmar Fonti & Auld, accuses the defendants of concealing the bank's 'pervasive' deficiencies in regards to its compliance with the Bank Secrecy Act and the quality of its anti-money laundering controls. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Arun Subramanian, is 1:24-cv-09445, Gonzalez v. The Toronto-Dominion Bank et al.
Who Got The Work
Crown Castle International, a Pennsylvania company providing shared communications infrastructure, has turned to Luke D. Wolf of Gordon Rees Scully Mansukhani to fend off a pending breach-of-contract lawsuit. The court action, filed Nov. 25 in Michigan Eastern District Court by Hooper Hathaway PC on behalf of The Town Residences LLC, accuses Crown Castle of failing to transfer approximately $30,000 in utility payments from T-Mobile in breach of a roof-top lease and assignment agreement. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Susan K. Declercq, is 2:24-cv-13131, The Town Residences LLC v. T-Mobile US, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Wilfred P. Coronato and Daniel M. Schwartz of McCarter & English have stepped in as defense counsel to Electrolux Home Products Inc. in a pending product liability lawsuit. The court action, filed Nov. 26 in New York Eastern District Court by Poulos Lopiccolo PC and Nagel Rice LLP on behalf of David Stern, alleges that the defendant's refrigerators’ drawers and shelving repeatedly break and fall apart within months after purchase. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Joan M. Azrack, is 2:24-cv-08204, Stern v. Electrolux Home Products, Inc.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250