Florida Lawmakers to Ban Discrimination in Organ Transplants
The process of seeking a transplant is stressful, and disabled patients who are denied organs may not even realize they were illegally discriminated against.
February 20, 2020 at 12:49 PM
4 minute read
Florida's Legislature is moving toward ensuring new protections for disabled people who may need organ transplants, part of a national trend among states.
The proposals would formally ban insurance companies and others from denying transplants for anyone with physical or mental disabilities. Committees in the House and Senate unanimously approved bills on the subject last week.
Twelve states, including California, Maryland and New Jersey, already have such laws in place, according to the New York-based National Down Syndrome Society. Florida is one of eight states with pending legislation. Roughly 112,500 people in the U.S. are awaiting organ transplants.
Many organ transplant centers have policies that bar or caution against placing people with HIV, psychiatric disabilities or intellectual and developmental disabilities on waiting lists to receive an organ transplant, according to a 2019 report for President Donald Trump by the National Council for Disabilities.
The rights of people with physical and intellectual disabilities are already protected under the Americans with Disabilities Act, but the council's report said doctors and organ transplant centers are often unaware that the law applies to the organ transplant process. It found continued problems even in states that have passed laws such as the one being considered in Florida.
Last year, for example, federal regulators settled a complaint against the University of North Carolina health care system involving a staff doctor who determined a patient was not a good candidate for heart transplant because of the patient's developmental learning disabilities and because the patient did not live independently.
"Every life is precious, and no one should be blocked from access to an organ transplant because of stereotypes about persons with disabilities," Roger Severino, the director of the Office of Civil Rights for the U.S. Health and Human Services Department said in a statement.
The process of seeking a transplant is stressful, and disabled patients who are denied organs may not even realize they were illegally discriminated against.
"They are discouraged, and sometimes they have been told that they don't qualify multiple times," said Dee Alexander, a senior aide to Florida Sen. Aaron Bean, R-Jacksonville, who sponsored one of the bills. "Most people don't go back. They are just so frustrated and exhausted from the process that they don't go back."
Some social and environmental factors are considered during the process of deciding who receives a donated organ, said Michelle Gilchrist, chief executive officer of the National Foundation for Transplants, based in the Memphis, Tennessee. But it would be biased to decide not to give someone with Down syndrome an organ because they may have a lower life expectancy, she said.
Georgia is considering a similar bill called Gracie's Law, named after the infant daughter of nurse Erin Nobles of Louisville, Georgia, whose daughter was born with Down syndrome. Another supporter of that bill is Stephanie Meredith, medical outreach director at the University of Kentucky's Human Development Institute and mother of a 20-year-old, Andy, who also has Down syndrome.
Meredith said Andy's disability could be used to prevent him from receiving a transplant if he ever needs one.
"The idea of denying anyone a transplant when they could be successful, based on perception about their quality of life, is discriminatory," Meredith said.
Everitt Rosen reports for Fresh Take Florida, a news service of the University of Florida.
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2024 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllFla.'s Statute of Limitations and Statutes of Repose in Med Mal Cases: It's Not Over Until It's Over
6 minute readGC of Florida State Agency Steps Down After Threatening TV Stations That Aired Abortion-Rights Ad
Trending Stories
- 1Gibson Dunn Sued By Crypto Client After Lateral Hire Causes Conflict of Interest
- 2Trump's Solicitor General Expected to 'Flip' Prelogar's Positions at Supreme Court
- 3Pharmacy Lawyers See Promise in NY Regulator's Curbs on PBM Industry
- 4Outgoing USPTO Director Kathi Vidal: ‘We All Want the Country to Be in a Better Place’
- 5Supreme Court Will Review Constitutionality Of FCC's Universal Service Fund
Who Got The Work
Michael G. Bongiorno, Andrew Scott Dulberg and Elizabeth E. Driscoll from Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr have stepped in to represent Symbotic Inc., an A.I.-enabled technology platform that focuses on increasing supply chain efficiency, and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The case, filed Oct. 2 in Massachusetts District Court by the Brown Law Firm on behalf of Stephen Austen, accuses certain officers and directors of misleading investors in regard to Symbotic's potential for margin growth by failing to disclose that the company was not equipped to timely deploy its systems or manage expenses through project delays. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Nathaniel M. Gorton, is 1:24-cv-12522, Austen v. Cohen et al.
Who Got The Work
Edmund Polubinski and Marie Killmond of Davis Polk & Wardwell have entered appearances for data platform software development company MongoDB and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The action, filed Oct. 7 in New York Southern District Court by the Brown Law Firm, accuses the company's directors and/or officers of falsely expressing confidence in the company’s restructuring of its sales incentive plan and downplaying the severity of decreases in its upfront commitments. The case is 1:24-cv-07594, Roy v. Ittycheria et al.
Who Got The Work
Amy O. Bruchs and Kurt F. Ellison of Michael Best & Friedrich have entered appearances for Epic Systems Corp. in a pending employment discrimination lawsuit. The suit was filed Sept. 7 in Wisconsin Western District Court by Levine Eisberner LLC and Siri & Glimstad on behalf of a project manager who claims that he was wrongfully terminated after applying for a religious exemption to the defendant's COVID-19 vaccine mandate. The case, assigned to U.S. Magistrate Judge Anita Marie Boor, is 3:24-cv-00630, Secker, Nathan v. Epic Systems Corporation.
Who Got The Work
David X. Sullivan, Thomas J. Finn and Gregory A. Hall from McCarter & English have entered appearances for Sunrun Installation Services in a pending civil rights lawsuit. The complaint was filed Sept. 4 in Connecticut District Court by attorney Robert M. Berke on behalf of former employee George Edward Steins, who was arrested and charged with employing an unregistered home improvement salesperson. The complaint alleges that had Sunrun informed the Connecticut Department of Consumer Protection that the plaintiff's employment had ended in 2017 and that he no longer held Sunrun's home improvement contractor license, he would not have been hit with charges, which were dismissed in May 2024. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Jeffrey A. Meyer, is 3:24-cv-01423, Steins v. Sunrun, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Greenberg Traurig shareholder Joshua L. Raskin has entered an appearance for boohoo.com UK Ltd. in a pending patent infringement lawsuit. The suit, filed Sept. 3 in Texas Eastern District Court by Rozier Hardt McDonough on behalf of Alto Dynamics, asserts five patents related to an online shopping platform. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Rodney Gilstrap, is 2:24-cv-00719, Alto Dynamics, LLC v. boohoo.com UK Limited.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250