Lawsuit Blaming Grape for Winn-Dixie Fall Runs Out of Juice
The case shows how training policies and staff response to an accident can save a company from legal trouble.
February 20, 2020 at 01:44 PM
3 minute read
A premises liability lawsuit brought by a Broward woman, who slipped and fell in a supermarket, has taken a tumble of its own in the Fourth District Court of Appeal, which threw out the case after analyzing evidence about how long a grape had been on the floor.
The ruling demonstrates how a company's training policies and its staff's response to an accident could save businesses from legal trouble.
Plaintiff Brandy T. Oliver sued Winn-Dixie Stores Inc. in 2017, alleging a "liquid substance" sent her into a half-split on the floor. That substance turned out to be a "squished grape," according to the Fourth DCA's ruling, which dissected whether staff knew or should have known the grape was on the floor.
Oliver's lawsuit proved fruitless.
The appellate panel agreed with Broward Circuit Judge Carol-Lisa Phillips' decision to grant Winn-Dixie summary judgment. It found employee and customer testimony particularly compelling.
Staff were trained to "always be on the lookout" for spills and to "immediately address" them, according to the ruling, which noted that surveillance footage showed one employee had walked through the area where Oliver slipped four times in a 30-minute period to stack shelves. That employee testified that he saw a clear, clean and dry floor, though the footage wasn't clear enough to show where he was looking.
Oliver fell 13 minutes after the employee was last there, and a manager responded to the accident within about two minutes, according to the ruling. Upon inspection, staff testified to seeing a squished grape with a single slip mark through its juice.
Crucially, that testimony was consistent with what a customer witness had said about a "very small" substance that "might have been the cause" of Oliver's fall.
Nobody, including the plaintiff, saw the rogue grape or any cart tracks or footprints through it before the fall, which the Fourth DCA took to mean that it wasn't on the floor long enough for anyone to have constructive knowledge about it.
According to the opinion, Oliver also acknowledged there was no evidence Winn-Dixie did know about the grape or its surrounding juice. But she argued the trial court shouldn't have given her the burden of proving that at the summary judgment stage.
The appeals court agreed but found that because Winn-Dixie had satisfied its burden of clearing up remaining issues of fact in the case, it became the plaintiff's burden to show that the supermarket should have and could have done something about the potential hazard.
Robin Hazel of Hazel Law in Pembroke Pines represented the plaintiff, while Wesley L. Catri of Catri, Holton, Kessler & Kessler in Fort Lauderdale represented Winn-Dixie. They did not respond to a request for comment by deadline.
Fourth DCA Judge Jeffrey T. Kuntz wrote the ruling, with Judges Cory J. Ciklin and Burton C. Conner concurring.
Read the ruling:
More appeals:
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2024 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllBoies Schiller Company Loses Appeal: Could Owe 7 Figures in Attorney Fees
$50K Offer Spins Off Into $4.4M Verdict Against Travelers Insurance
What Is Exhibit J? Litigators Are Watching This AI Test Case
Mass Arbitration: Miami Lawyer Leads Charge for 33 Clients Alleging Fraud
Trending Stories
Who Got The Work
Dechert partners Andrew J. Levander, Angela M. Liu and Neil A. Steiner have stepped in to defend Arbor Realty Trust and certain executives in a pending securities class action. The complaint, filed July 31 in New York Eastern District Court by Levi & Korsinsky, contends that the defendants concealed a 'toxic' mobile home portfolio, vastly overstated collateral in regards to the company's loans and failed to disclose an investigation of the company by the FBI. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Pamela K. Chen, is 1:24-cv-05347, Martin v. Arbor Realty Trust, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Arthur G. Jakoby, Ryan Feeney and Maxim M.L. Nowak from Herrick Feinstein have stepped in to defend Charles Dilluvio and Seacor Capital in a pending securities lawsuit. The complaint, filed Sept. 30 in New York Southern District Court by the Securities and Exchange Commission, accuses the defendants of using consulting agreements, attorney opinion letters and other mechanisms to skirt regulations limiting stock sales by affiliate companies and allowing the defendants to unlawfully profit from sales of Enzolytics stock. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Andrew L. Carter Jr., is 1:24-cv-07362, Securities and Exchange Commission v. Zhabilov et al.
Who Got The Work
Clark Hill members Vincent Roskovensky and Kevin B. Watson have entered appearances for Architectural Steel and Associated Products in a pending environmental lawsuit. The complaint, filed Aug. 27 in Pennsylvania Eastern District Court by Brodsky & Smith on behalf of Hung Trinh, accuses the defendant of discharging polluted stormwater from its steel facility without a permit in violation of the Clean Water Act. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Gerald J. Pappert, is 2:24-cv-04490, Trinh v. Architectural Steel And Associated Products, Inc.
Who Got The Work
Michael R. Yellin of Cole Schotz has entered an appearance for S2 d/b/a the Shoe Surgeon, Dominic Chambrone a/k/a Dominic Ciambrone and other defendants in a pending trademark infringement lawsuit. The case, filed July 15 in New York Southern District Court by DLA Piper on behalf of Nike, seeks to enjoin Ciambrone and the other defendants in their attempts to build an 'entire multifaceted' retail empire through their unauthorized use of Nike’s trademark rights. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Naomi Reice Buchwald, is 1:24-cv-05307, Nike Inc. v. S2, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Sullivan & Cromwell partner Adam S. Paris has entered an appearance for Orthofix Medical in a pending securities class action arising from a proposed acquisition of SeaSpine by Orthofix. The suit, filed Sept. 6 in California Southern District Court, by Girard Sharp and the Hall Firm, contends that the offering materials and related oral communications contained untrue statements of material fact. According to the complaint, the defendants made a series of misrepresentations about Orthofix’s disclosure controls and internal controls over financial reporting and ethical compliance. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Linda Lopez, is 3:24-cv-01593, O'Hara v. Orthofix Medical Inc. et al.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250