Ex-Miami Heat Lawyer Blames Firing on Request for Parental Leave
A former associate general counsel claims the team, which plays at the American Airlines Arena, violated the Family and Medical Leave Act by firing her.
February 21, 2020 at 04:50 PM
5 minute read
The original version of this story was published on Corporate Counsel
A former Miami Heat vice president and associate general counsel claims the NBA team and its top lawyer retaliated against her after she adopted a baby and took parental leave.
Vered Yakovee worked in the Heat's legal department from March 2015 until December 2019 when the team president of business operations called her into his office and "told her she was terminated, and to go home immediately," according to a lawsuit assigned to U.S. District Judge Federico Moreno in Miami.
Yakovee is a veteran sports law attorney who previously served as associate team counsel for the Boston Celtics, taught sports law at the University of Southern California Gould School of Law and was editor-in-chief of the American Bar Association's entertainment and sports lawyer publication.
Her complaint, which alleges violations of the Family and Medical Leave Act, names Miami Heat L.P. as the sole defendant. But the team's general counsel and Yakovee's former boss, Raquel Libman, figures prominently in the allegations laid out in the complaint.
Libman, a graduate of Yale University and the University of Miami School of Law, joined the Heat as general counsel in 2001 after serving as the GC for Continucare Corp., a publicly traded health care company. She has three sons, according to her bio page on the Heat's website.
In a 2013 interview with Profile magazine, Libman said her "liberal upbringing" made it easier for her to enter the traditionally male-dominated world of professional sports. That upbringing, she explained, "prevented certain mental barriers from developing too early and therefore it enabled me — and even encouraged me — to take risks and not shy away from competitiveness in the workplace."
When Yakovee announced last July that she had been selected to adopt a newborn baby and would need immediate parental leave, Libman allegedly responded by saying, "Now I definitely won't get to take a vacation," according to Yakovee's complaint.
Yakovee took maternity leave under the FMLA, which gives covered employees up to 12 weeks of unpaid childbirth and bonding time. She returned to a hostile work environment where Libman treated her with "disdain and hostility," according to the suit.
Libman "berated Ms. Yakovee and complained about her FMLA leave not only privately but also publicly in group meetings and on group email correspondence," the complaint states. The suit said Libman canceled their weekly one-on-one meetings that started when Yakovee was hired.
Attempts to speak with a Heat representative and Libman were not immediately successful. The team has not responded to Yakovee's complaint.
"My client and I stand behind the allegations in the complaint," Yakovee's attorney, Erika Rotbart of Deutsch Rotbart & Associates in Boca Raton, said Friday. She declined to comment further.
In her complaint, Yakovee states the Heat's vice president of human resources asked to meet with her after Libman "self-reported" to HR, though it is unclear what exactly Libman reported.
After the meeting, Yakovee said she provided, at HR's request, a report detailing the "disparate, hostile, and demeaning treatment she was suffering at the hands of Ms. Libman."
She later asked the president of business operations to assign an independent investigator to the matter because the HR vice president and Libman are "close friends," according to the complaint. But her request was denied on the same day that the director of human resources sent Yakovee an email criticizing her for failing to provide "enough advance notice" for her parental leave.
Yakovee asserts in her complaint that the email was part of an effort "led by Ms. Libman and supported" by the Heat to "litter the file" and provide Libman and the team "grounds to continue to harass and retaliate" against her.
After she was fired and sent home, Yakovee said she received a text message from the Heat's outside counsel, who wanted her to "immediately execute a non-negotiable, 'take-it-or-leave-it' " severance agreement that would have required her to waive her rights in exchange for monetary compensation. She declined the offer.
Now, Yakovee is seeking lost wages, employment benefits and other compensation and damages. She also wants her job back.
Read the complaint:
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2024 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllDivided State Court Reinstates Dispute Over Replacement Vehicles Fees
5 minute readSecond Circuit Ruling Expands VPPA Scope: What Organizations Need to Know
6 minute read'They Got All Bent Out of Shape:' Parkland Lawyers Clash With Each Other
Courts of Appeal Conflicted Over Rule 1.442(c)(3) When Claims for Damages Involve a Husband and Wife
Trending Stories
Who Got The Work
Michael G. Bongiorno, Andrew Scott Dulberg and Elizabeth E. Driscoll from Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr have stepped in to represent Symbotic Inc., an A.I.-enabled technology platform that focuses on increasing supply chain efficiency, and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The case, filed Oct. 2 in Massachusetts District Court by the Brown Law Firm on behalf of Stephen Austen, accuses certain officers and directors of misleading investors in regard to Symbotic's potential for margin growth by failing to disclose that the company was not equipped to timely deploy its systems or manage expenses through project delays. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Nathaniel M. Gorton, is 1:24-cv-12522, Austen v. Cohen et al.
Who Got The Work
Edmund Polubinski and Marie Killmond of Davis Polk & Wardwell have entered appearances for data platform software development company MongoDB and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The action, filed Oct. 7 in New York Southern District Court by the Brown Law Firm, accuses the company's directors and/or officers of falsely expressing confidence in the company’s restructuring of its sales incentive plan and downplaying the severity of decreases in its upfront commitments. The case is 1:24-cv-07594, Roy v. Ittycheria et al.
Who Got The Work
Amy O. Bruchs and Kurt F. Ellison of Michael Best & Friedrich have entered appearances for Epic Systems Corp. in a pending employment discrimination lawsuit. The suit was filed Sept. 7 in Wisconsin Western District Court by Levine Eisberner LLC and Siri & Glimstad on behalf of a project manager who claims that he was wrongfully terminated after applying for a religious exemption to the defendant's COVID-19 vaccine mandate. The case, assigned to U.S. Magistrate Judge Anita Marie Boor, is 3:24-cv-00630, Secker, Nathan v. Epic Systems Corporation.
Who Got The Work
David X. Sullivan, Thomas J. Finn and Gregory A. Hall from McCarter & English have entered appearances for Sunrun Installation Services in a pending civil rights lawsuit. The complaint was filed Sept. 4 in Connecticut District Court by attorney Robert M. Berke on behalf of former employee George Edward Steins, who was arrested and charged with employing an unregistered home improvement salesperson. The complaint alleges that had Sunrun informed the Connecticut Department of Consumer Protection that the plaintiff's employment had ended in 2017 and that he no longer held Sunrun's home improvement contractor license, he would not have been hit with charges, which were dismissed in May 2024. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Jeffrey A. Meyer, is 3:24-cv-01423, Steins v. Sunrun, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Greenberg Traurig shareholder Joshua L. Raskin has entered an appearance for boohoo.com UK Ltd. in a pending patent infringement lawsuit. The suit, filed Sept. 3 in Texas Eastern District Court by Rozier Hardt McDonough on behalf of Alto Dynamics, asserts five patents related to an online shopping platform. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Rodney Gilstrap, is 2:24-cv-00719, Alto Dynamics, LLC v. boohoo.com UK Limited.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250