Former DLA Litigation Chair and In-House Counsel Create Corporate Compliance Boutique
Former DLA Piper Miami litigation chair Angela Crawford and Rolls Royce in-house counsel Lila Acharya, both women of color, say their experience as in-house and outside counsel makes them a strong choice for corporate clients.
February 21, 2020 at 04:42 PM
4 minute read
|
Former DLA Piper Miami litigation chair Angela Crawford and Rolls-Royce in-house counsel Lila Acharya have formed the firm Crawford & Acharya, a corporate compliance boutique based out of Boston and Miami.
Crawford, who is based in Miami, spent 12 years at DLA Piper, rising to the head of the firm's Miami litigation practice in 2017. Before that, she spent a year as an Assistant U.S. attorney in Illinois and five years as a litigator at Kirkland & Ellis.
Acharya, based in Boston and licensed in the U.K., most recently worked for Rolls-Royce, where she helped remediate the company's compliance protocol after it settled a bribery case for £671 million ($870.51 million) in early 2017. Before that, she worked for Bank of America, Thermo Fisher Scientific, Pfizer and Ropes & Gray. She also spent more than four years as a prosecutor in Massachusetts.
The pair said that the boutique model in their line of work leads to a closer, more flexible relationship with clients. They represent large and mid-size companies in heavy-regulated markets, mostly in the pharmaceutical and life sciences industries both in the U.S. and the U.K., they said.
The duo said as both in-house and outside counsel, they have conducted a combined 150 investigations, trainings and compliance reviews in more than 30 countries around the world.
"When our clients hire us they're actually getting us. They get two people who are experienced practitioners that have the in-house view and the seasoned view Angela has from DLA," Acharya said.
Both Acharya and Crawford said they offer more flexibility than their Big Law competitors, working closely with clients to craft alternative fee arrangements so that their corporate clients know exactly what to expect out of their legal spend. While such fee arrangements may be more difficult in transactional work or litigation, the nature of compliance matters makes them an easy fit, they said.
"When we wanted to create Crawford & Acharya, we wanted to do it in a way to have flexibility in our fee structure, anything from having a monthly retainer to hourly and capped fees," Crawford said.
"If somebody is engaging you to do a risk assessment or revise and draft a set of procedures for them, it's pretty straightforward in terms of pricing," Acharya added.
They also see the fact that they are both women of color as a strength, especially as corporate clients continue prioritizing diverse teams to the point of pulling legal spend from nondiverse law firms.
"We're immensely proud of being a women-of-color firm," Crawford said. "We spend a lot of time on the ground interacting with people who are different from us ethnically and culturally, whether we're in the Czech Republic, Dubai or the Philippines. Multifaceted diversity is critically important in this space."
The two met four years ago in Dubai when they worked on an investigation together. Acharya was working in-house at Pfizer and Crawford was working as outside counsel at DLA. They immediately hit it off and have stayed in touch ever since, although the two have never worked together in the same city.
And the firm is looking to grow immediately, given the "discussions" and reactions the founders have gotten from clients. Growth could mean adding associates, experienced partners or contract lawyers. Regardless, Crawford is wary of growing past the boutique size they see as an advantage.
"We really do want to grow our firm," Crawford said, "but grow it in a way to maintain our boutique size."
|Read More:
FBI's New Miami International Corruption Squad Sends Clear Message to S. Fla. Businesses
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2024 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllMorgan & Morgan Looks to Grow Into Complex Litigation While Still Keeping its Billboards Up
6 minute readLost in the Legal Maze: How State Regulations Are Hindering Hemp Operators' Success
7 minute readFrom ‘Deep Sadness’ to Little Concern, Gaetz’s Nomination Draws Sharp Reaction From Lawyers
7 minute readLaw Firms Mentioned
Trending Stories
- 1The Growing PFAS Morass: Why Insurance Should Cover These Products Liability Claims
- 2Dallas Jury Awards $98.65M in Botham Jean Killing by Dallas Officer
- 3In Talc Bankruptcy, Andy Birchfield Skipped His Deposition. Could He Face Sanctions?
- 4Pharmaceutical Patents: Benefits and Challenges
- 5Where Do Web-Tracking Class Actions Belong? 8th Circuit Weighs the Issue
Who Got The Work
Michael G. Bongiorno, Andrew Scott Dulberg and Elizabeth E. Driscoll from Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr have stepped in to represent Symbotic Inc., an A.I.-enabled technology platform that focuses on increasing supply chain efficiency, and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The case, filed Oct. 2 in Massachusetts District Court by the Brown Law Firm on behalf of Stephen Austen, accuses certain officers and directors of misleading investors in regard to Symbotic's potential for margin growth by failing to disclose that the company was not equipped to timely deploy its systems or manage expenses through project delays. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Nathaniel M. Gorton, is 1:24-cv-12522, Austen v. Cohen et al.
Who Got The Work
Edmund Polubinski and Marie Killmond of Davis Polk & Wardwell have entered appearances for data platform software development company MongoDB and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The action, filed Oct. 7 in New York Southern District Court by the Brown Law Firm, accuses the company's directors and/or officers of falsely expressing confidence in the company’s restructuring of its sales incentive plan and downplaying the severity of decreases in its upfront commitments. The case is 1:24-cv-07594, Roy v. Ittycheria et al.
Who Got The Work
Amy O. Bruchs and Kurt F. Ellison of Michael Best & Friedrich have entered appearances for Epic Systems Corp. in a pending employment discrimination lawsuit. The suit was filed Sept. 7 in Wisconsin Western District Court by Levine Eisberner LLC and Siri & Glimstad on behalf of a project manager who claims that he was wrongfully terminated after applying for a religious exemption to the defendant's COVID-19 vaccine mandate. The case, assigned to U.S. Magistrate Judge Anita Marie Boor, is 3:24-cv-00630, Secker, Nathan v. Epic Systems Corporation.
Who Got The Work
David X. Sullivan, Thomas J. Finn and Gregory A. Hall from McCarter & English have entered appearances for Sunrun Installation Services in a pending civil rights lawsuit. The complaint was filed Sept. 4 in Connecticut District Court by attorney Robert M. Berke on behalf of former employee George Edward Steins, who was arrested and charged with employing an unregistered home improvement salesperson. The complaint alleges that had Sunrun informed the Connecticut Department of Consumer Protection that the plaintiff's employment had ended in 2017 and that he no longer held Sunrun's home improvement contractor license, he would not have been hit with charges, which were dismissed in May 2024. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Jeffrey A. Meyer, is 3:24-cv-01423, Steins v. Sunrun, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Greenberg Traurig shareholder Joshua L. Raskin has entered an appearance for boohoo.com UK Ltd. in a pending patent infringement lawsuit. The suit, filed Sept. 3 in Texas Eastern District Court by Rozier Hardt McDonough on behalf of Alto Dynamics, asserts five patents related to an online shopping platform. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Rodney Gilstrap, is 2:24-cv-00719, Alto Dynamics, LLC v. boohoo.com UK Limited.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250