Florida Supreme Court Suspends Miami Lawyer, Former Locke Lord Partner
"In my opinion, my case was far too complicated for a jury to understand, and to get it right," the attorney said via email Thursday, vowing to fight the criminal and ethics charges against him.
February 27, 2020 at 05:24 PM
3 minute read
Miami attorney Mark S. Scott has been suspended until further notice, after a New York court found him guilty of two felony counts of conspiracy to commit money laundering and bank fraud.
Scott's crimes stemmed from what prosecutors said was a $400 million wire-fraud scam, grounded in cryptocurrency business OneCoin.
Scott is a former partner at Locke Lord. He was admitted to practice in Florida in 1998, and has no prior disciplinary history.
Read more: Ex-Locke Lord Partner Swiftly Convicted in $400M Crypto Case
Scott's discipline case is ongoing, with Miami-Dade County Court Judge Natalie Moore serving as the court-appointed referee. Moore will make recommendations to the high court on potential sanctions under Florida Bar Rule 3-7.2(h), which governs procedures on criminal or professional misconduct.
Meanwhile, Scott maintains that he is innocent, and declined an offer to permanently give up his law license to save time and expense.
"In my opinion, my case was far too complicated for a jury to understand, and to get it right," Scott said via email Thursday. "It is my hope and expectation that Judge [Edgardo] Ramos will have a better handle of the facts, spanning several countries, and how to apply the rather complicated laws, such as extraterritorial restrictions on wire fraud."
Scott says he will contest his bar discipline case and criminal case, having moved for an acquittal under Federal Rule of Criminal Procedure 29, or a new trial under Rule 33. Scott's defense attorneys argued he was tricked by OneCoin's founder into laundering money and committing fraud.
But jurors disagreed.
"I will continue to fight as long as it takes, and do whatever it takes to restore my good reputation. And believe me, the U.S. federal government makes sure you have almost no chance. The DOJ attorneys, in my opinion, while many, I am sure, are very smart and skilled, have every advantage on their side—unlimited research power, procedural advantages, a dream team of jurors to pick from that they offer deals to," Scott said. "This is always a David-versus-Goliath fight. AUSAs get away with everything. Hopefully this time we can show how they crossed the line."
Miami defense attorney David Garvin represents Scott, who is scheduled for sentencing in New York April 22.
Scott was one of 11 Florida lawyers disciplined between Jan. 25 to Feb. 21, according to information the Florida Bar released Thursday. Five lawyers were suspended, two disbarred, two reprimanded, one was admonished and one placed on probation.
Read more:
No Disbarment for Broward Lawyer Who Represented Judge Watson: Bar Filed Too Late
Sex in Exchange for Legal Services? Miami Lawyer Arrested on Bribery Charges
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2025 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllLocal Boutique Expands Significantly, Hiring Litigator Who Won $63M Verdict Against City of Miami Commissioner
3 minute readGreenberg Traurig Combines Digital Infrastructure and Real Estate Groups, Anticipating Uptick in Demand
4 minute readUS Judge Cannon Blocks DOJ From Releasing Final Report in Trump Documents Probe
3 minute readPlaintiffs Allege Carollo Retaliated Over Bayfront Trust Accounting Discoveries
3 minute readLaw Firms Mentioned
Trending Stories
- 1Decision of the Day: Judge Dismisses Defamation Suit by New York Philharmonic Oboist Accused of Sexual Misconduct
- 2California Court Denies Apple's Motion to Strike Allegations in Gender Bias Class Action
- 3US DOJ Threatens to Prosecute Local Officials Who Don't Aid Immigration Enforcement
- 4Kirkland Is Entering a New Market. Will Its Rates Get a Warm Welcome?
- 5African Law Firm Investigated Over ‘AI-Generated’ Case References
Who Got The Work
J. Brugh Lower of Gibbons has entered an appearance for industrial equipment supplier Devco Corporation in a pending trademark infringement lawsuit. The suit, accusing the defendant of selling knock-off Graco products, was filed Dec. 18 in New Jersey District Court by Rivkin Radler on behalf of Graco Inc. and Graco Minnesota. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Zahid N. Quraishi, is 3:24-cv-11294, Graco Inc. et al v. Devco Corporation.
Who Got The Work
Rebecca Maller-Stein and Kent A. Yalowitz of Arnold & Porter Kaye Scholer have entered their appearances for Hanaco Venture Capital and its executives, Lior Prosor and David Frankel, in a pending securities lawsuit. The action, filed on Dec. 24 in New York Southern District Court by Zell, Aron & Co. on behalf of Goldeneye Advisors, accuses the defendants of negligently and fraudulently managing the plaintiff's $1 million investment. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Vernon S. Broderick, is 1:24-cv-09918, Goldeneye Advisors, LLC v. Hanaco Venture Capital, Ltd. et al.
Who Got The Work
Attorneys from A&O Shearman has stepped in as defense counsel for Toronto-Dominion Bank and other defendants in a pending securities class action. The suit, filed Dec. 11 in New York Southern District Court by Bleichmar Fonti & Auld, accuses the defendants of concealing the bank's 'pervasive' deficiencies in regards to its compliance with the Bank Secrecy Act and the quality of its anti-money laundering controls. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Arun Subramanian, is 1:24-cv-09445, Gonzalez v. The Toronto-Dominion Bank et al.
Who Got The Work
Crown Castle International, a Pennsylvania company providing shared communications infrastructure, has turned to Luke D. Wolf of Gordon Rees Scully Mansukhani to fend off a pending breach-of-contract lawsuit. The court action, filed Nov. 25 in Michigan Eastern District Court by Hooper Hathaway PC on behalf of The Town Residences LLC, accuses Crown Castle of failing to transfer approximately $30,000 in utility payments from T-Mobile in breach of a roof-top lease and assignment agreement. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Susan K. Declercq, is 2:24-cv-13131, The Town Residences LLC v. T-Mobile US, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Wilfred P. Coronato and Daniel M. Schwartz of McCarter & English have stepped in as defense counsel to Electrolux Home Products Inc. in a pending product liability lawsuit. The court action, filed Nov. 26 in New York Eastern District Court by Poulos Lopiccolo PC and Nagel Rice LLP on behalf of David Stern, alleges that the defendant's refrigerators’ drawers and shelving repeatedly break and fall apart within months after purchase. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Joan M. Azrack, is 2:24-cv-08204, Stern v. Electrolux Home Products, Inc.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250