'We Just Dig Deeper': Litigator Bob Kelley on His Longest Trial, Tactics
In his new book, Fort Lauderdale attorney Bob Kelley recollects successfully doing battle with General Motors for documents that would help deliver an eight-digit verdict.
March 02, 2020 at 11:50 AM
5 minute read
Personal injury attorney Bob Kelley is accustomed to winning big verdicts against giant companies by digging into the records and digging in his heels when needed in the courtroom.
It helps that he has the kind of magnetic trial lawyer's personality that enthralls many jurors, but don't underestimate the other litigation powers that got him in front juries in the first place.
The Kelley | Uustal co-founder's longest trial ended after six months with an eight-digit verdict against General Motors for one of two victims of a fiery crash. After repeated attempts through the years, he finished writing a book titled "The Memorandum" about the case.
Kelley and partner John Uustal uncovered and assembled corporate records that GM tried for years to keep out of the nation's courtrooms to avoid showing it knew how lethal some of its gas tanks could be but treated the resulting deaths and injuries as a secret cost of doing business — $4.50 per vehicle for a tank shield. A long-hidden internal report is the source of book's title.
Written with former TV journalist Carlos Harrison, the book subtitled "A True Story of Justice Forged from Fire" details corporate misconduct uncovered while Kelley represented two school teachers whose 13-year-old son was burned on every body part but his soles when he was the last to get out of a 1983 Oldsmobile Cutlass Cruiser station wagon.
A homemade trailer came unhitched from another car slowing at a Virginia tollbooth and slid with "a little bump" or a "thud" into the wagon, piercing its gasoline tank and instantly setting off an inferno that claimed the lives of Matt Murphy and Nancy Harris within days.
All of the discovery was done in the pre-Internet age of paper trails that stretched to Detroit and Los Angeles. One hunch led to another about what GM knew.
The Broward Circuit Court verdict reached in 1999 was affirmed on appeal in 2003. With interest, GM paid $90 million, a company record in a post-collision fuel-fed fire case. It was the subject of a "60 Minutes" segment that portrayed the company's prolonged history of hiding incriminating internal reports.
The book is part tactical guide to high-stakes litigation and part memoir written in quick, breezy sentences. Kelley tells why he doesn't mind being underestimated by the opposing side and explains the personal costs that can drop into any lawyer's life.
Kelley said a lot of legal detail was left out of the book to keep the story on track. If you're intrigued, you can find the Sutton Hart Press book on Amazon and elsewhere.
He offers more observations on his 38-year legal career and his Fort Lauderdale firm, which handles wrongful death and catastrophic injury cases.
Vehicle safety: "This case is one of the cases that resulted in safer fuel tanks in cars."
Plaintiffs litigation: "It's been an important part of our justice system for many years, and I hope that it's able to survive going forward."
Changes in litigation: "The longer you practice law, at least in my area, the more cynical you become of the corporations that you're litigating against, and you just learn that they are not going to be forthcoming and honest in court, and so we just dig deeper and deeper into these cases every year."
Jury selection: "I have known for certain the past 15 or 20 years of my career that the most important part of the trial is the jury selection process. It takes a while to learn that as a lawyer. … It means that we have a high degree of certainty on how a trial will come out when the jury selection is over."
Work pace: "I'm always handling just very few cases." He focused on five to 10 cases at a time for the last five years. The firm recently filed eight tobacco cases in Las Vegas. "We're cranking it up out there."
Succession planning at his 16-attorney firm: "Oh no, we haven't started that yet. I'm not old, but I do have a lot of young lawyers here who are chomping at the bit to get into the courtroom."
His future: "I actually am going to start working on another book."
|Read more:
After Client's Death, Broward Lawyers Win $12.5 Million Verdict in Tobacco Case
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2024 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllSecond Circuit Ruling Expands VPPA Scope: What Organizations Need to Know
6 minute read'They Got All Bent Out of Shape:' Parkland Lawyers Clash With Each Other
Courts of Appeal Conflicted Over Rule 1.442(c)(3) When Claims for Damages Involve a Husband and Wife
Families Settle Court Battle Over Who Owns Parkland Killer's Name, Likeness
4 minute readTrending Stories
- 1Elon Musk Names Microsoft, Calif. AG to Amended OpenAI Suit
- 2Trump’s Plan to Purge Democracy
- 3Baltimore City Govt., After Winning Opioid Jury Trial, Preparing to Demand an Additional $11B for Abatement Costs
- 4X Joins Legal Attack on California's New Deepfakes Law
- 5Monsanto Wins Latest Philadelphia Roundup Trial
Who Got The Work
Michael G. Bongiorno, Andrew Scott Dulberg and Elizabeth E. Driscoll from Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr have stepped in to represent Symbotic Inc., an A.I.-enabled technology platform that focuses on increasing supply chain efficiency, and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The case, filed Oct. 2 in Massachusetts District Court by the Brown Law Firm on behalf of Stephen Austen, accuses certain officers and directors of misleading investors in regard to Symbotic's potential for margin growth by failing to disclose that the company was not equipped to timely deploy its systems or manage expenses through project delays. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Nathaniel M. Gorton, is 1:24-cv-12522, Austen v. Cohen et al.
Who Got The Work
Edmund Polubinski and Marie Killmond of Davis Polk & Wardwell have entered appearances for data platform software development company MongoDB and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The action, filed Oct. 7 in New York Southern District Court by the Brown Law Firm, accuses the company's directors and/or officers of falsely expressing confidence in the company’s restructuring of its sales incentive plan and downplaying the severity of decreases in its upfront commitments. The case is 1:24-cv-07594, Roy v. Ittycheria et al.
Who Got The Work
Amy O. Bruchs and Kurt F. Ellison of Michael Best & Friedrich have entered appearances for Epic Systems Corp. in a pending employment discrimination lawsuit. The suit was filed Sept. 7 in Wisconsin Western District Court by Levine Eisberner LLC and Siri & Glimstad on behalf of a project manager who claims that he was wrongfully terminated after applying for a religious exemption to the defendant's COVID-19 vaccine mandate. The case, assigned to U.S. Magistrate Judge Anita Marie Boor, is 3:24-cv-00630, Secker, Nathan v. Epic Systems Corporation.
Who Got The Work
David X. Sullivan, Thomas J. Finn and Gregory A. Hall from McCarter & English have entered appearances for Sunrun Installation Services in a pending civil rights lawsuit. The complaint was filed Sept. 4 in Connecticut District Court by attorney Robert M. Berke on behalf of former employee George Edward Steins, who was arrested and charged with employing an unregistered home improvement salesperson. The complaint alleges that had Sunrun informed the Connecticut Department of Consumer Protection that the plaintiff's employment had ended in 2017 and that he no longer held Sunrun's home improvement contractor license, he would not have been hit with charges, which were dismissed in May 2024. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Jeffrey A. Meyer, is 3:24-cv-01423, Steins v. Sunrun, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Greenberg Traurig shareholder Joshua L. Raskin has entered an appearance for boohoo.com UK Ltd. in a pending patent infringement lawsuit. The suit, filed Sept. 3 in Texas Eastern District Court by Rozier Hardt McDonough on behalf of Alto Dynamics, asserts five patents related to an online shopping platform. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Rodney Gilstrap, is 2:24-cv-00719, Alto Dynamics, LLC v. boohoo.com UK Limited.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250