Policies May Offer Limited Coverage for These Coronavirus-Related Scenarios
Standard commercial insurance policies are not generally designed to protect against people getting sick. However, standard policies may provide limited coverage under the right circumstances.
March 04, 2020 at 01:45 PM
5 minute read
The economic impact of coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) is spreading like the virus itself. As the financial effects trickle down from global organizations to regional and local businesses, many are asking whether losses caused by COVID-19 are or will be covered by insurance. This isn't an easy question because standard commercial insurance policies are not generally designed to protect against people getting sick. However, standard policies may provide limited coverage under the right circumstances.
- Scenario 1: Employee contracts COVID-19
Workers' compensation insurance generally covers occupational injuries and illnesses that arise out of work performed in the course and scope of employment. Employees contracting COVID-19 may be covered by workers' compensation insurance if they were initially exposed to the virus in the workplace or while working. But, an employee's employment, and the resulting exposure, must be the major contributing cause of contracting COVID-19.
Workers' compensation coverage would likely turn on whether an employee could establish a causal link between their employment and their exposure to COVID-19. This may be harder for some employees than others. Those working in the health care industry, for example, may find it easier to establish the causal link than those whose employment does not clearly subject them to a greater risk of exposure than that to which the general public is exposed.
- Scenario 2: Business operations interrupted due to COVID-19
Closed manufacturing facilities, quarantined workers, travel restrictions and the temporary suspension of imports and exports are just a few ways that a pandemic can disrupt crucial supply chains. The resulting disruption or interruption of operations poses perhaps the greatest financial risk to many businesses. Business Interruption Insurance, which replaces lost business income when a covered property loss causes a business to reduce or suspend its operations, may sound like the perfect solution, but it really isn't.
Business interruption coverage is triggered when a covered peril causes damage to covered property. The damage must be sufficient to render the property unusable in its current state. A standard policy, for example, would cover lost business income if operations are interrupted because the manufacturing facility is destroyed by fire. Coronavirus-related claims are unlikely to cause the property damage needed to trigger business interruption coverage. Even if facilities (offices, warehouses) or inventory (raw materials, fish, produce) are rendered unusable by COVID-19 contamination, business interruption coverage would be unlikely because standard policies typically contain exclusions for bacteria, viruses and other pollutants.
Supply chain insurance is an option for businesses wanting broader business interruption coverage. Policies can be written to name specific suppliers, manufacturers, etc. and to cover negotiated perils, including pandemics. Unfortunately, the breadth of coverage provided by supply chain insurance comes at a cost. Policy premiums are often cost prohibitive, particularly for smaller businesses.
- Scenario 3: Cancellation of business-related travel
Pandemics naturally stifle travel abroad, particularly to high-risk areas. Travel Insurance is designed to limit financial losses caused by various travel-related risks. Trip cancellation coverage, for example, reimburses pre-paid, nonrefundable travel expenses if trip is cancelled for a reason that is covered under the policy, such as an injury, illness or death involving you, a family member or a travel companion. Some insurers offer "cancel for any reason" coverage that should respond to pandemic-related cancellations. However, it's important to note that travel insurance does not cover "disinclination to travel" cancellations caused by fear or concern over what might happen while travelling abroad.
- Scenario 4: Cancellation of business function or special event
Event cancellation insurance, as its name implies, is designed to cover circumstances beyond your control that necessitate the interruption, abandonment or cancellation of a business-related function or event. Unfortunately, it's too late now to purchase coverage for cancellations prompted by COVID-19. Policies issued prior to the outbreak, however, may cover cancellations, at least for now. Insurers are expected to add exclusions for pandemics and communicable disease as policies renew.
- Scenario 5: Liability for negligently exposing others to COVID-19
Standard commercial general liability policies would likely respond to third-party claims regarding negligent release of or exposure to COVID-19.
Despite the potential for limited insurance coverage, it's worth noting that standard commercial insurance policies are not designed to cover the spread of contagious diseases like COVID-19 or the flu. And, depending on the severity and duration of the COVID-19 outbreak, insurance companies are likely to add exclusions that eliminate the possibility of any coverage for COVID-19 claims. As a result, most businesses will not be able to rely on their standard insurance policies to adequately protect against coronavirus-related losses.
Anita Byer is the president of Setnor Byer Insurance & Risk in Plantation, Florida.
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2025 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllTurning the Shock of a January Marital Split Into Effective Strategies for Your Well-Being
5 minute readTrending Issues in Florida Construction Law That Attorneys Need to Be Aware Of
6 minute readTrending Stories
- 1Uber Files RICO Suit Against Plaintiff-Side Firms Alleging Fraudulent Injury Claims
- 2The Law Firm Disrupted: Scrutinizing the Elephant More Than the Mouse
- 3Inherent Diminished Value Damages Unavailable to 3rd-Party Claimants, Court Says
- 4Pa. Defense Firm Sued by Client Over Ex-Eagles Player's $43.5M Med Mal Win
- 5Losses Mount at Morris Manning, but Departing Ex-Chair Stays Bullish About His Old Firm's Future
Who Got The Work
J. Brugh Lower of Gibbons has entered an appearance for industrial equipment supplier Devco Corporation in a pending trademark infringement lawsuit. The suit, accusing the defendant of selling knock-off Graco products, was filed Dec. 18 in New Jersey District Court by Rivkin Radler on behalf of Graco Inc. and Graco Minnesota. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Zahid N. Quraishi, is 3:24-cv-11294, Graco Inc. et al v. Devco Corporation.
Who Got The Work
Rebecca Maller-Stein and Kent A. Yalowitz of Arnold & Porter Kaye Scholer have entered their appearances for Hanaco Venture Capital and its executives, Lior Prosor and David Frankel, in a pending securities lawsuit. The action, filed on Dec. 24 in New York Southern District Court by Zell, Aron & Co. on behalf of Goldeneye Advisors, accuses the defendants of negligently and fraudulently managing the plaintiff's $1 million investment. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Vernon S. Broderick, is 1:24-cv-09918, Goldeneye Advisors, LLC v. Hanaco Venture Capital, Ltd. et al.
Who Got The Work
Attorneys from A&O Shearman has stepped in as defense counsel for Toronto-Dominion Bank and other defendants in a pending securities class action. The suit, filed Dec. 11 in New York Southern District Court by Bleichmar Fonti & Auld, accuses the defendants of concealing the bank's 'pervasive' deficiencies in regards to its compliance with the Bank Secrecy Act and the quality of its anti-money laundering controls. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Arun Subramanian, is 1:24-cv-09445, Gonzalez v. The Toronto-Dominion Bank et al.
Who Got The Work
Crown Castle International, a Pennsylvania company providing shared communications infrastructure, has turned to Luke D. Wolf of Gordon Rees Scully Mansukhani to fend off a pending breach-of-contract lawsuit. The court action, filed Nov. 25 in Michigan Eastern District Court by Hooper Hathaway PC on behalf of The Town Residences LLC, accuses Crown Castle of failing to transfer approximately $30,000 in utility payments from T-Mobile in breach of a roof-top lease and assignment agreement. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Susan K. Declercq, is 2:24-cv-13131, The Town Residences LLC v. T-Mobile US, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Wilfred P. Coronato and Daniel M. Schwartz of McCarter & English have stepped in as defense counsel to Electrolux Home Products Inc. in a pending product liability lawsuit. The court action, filed Nov. 26 in New York Eastern District Court by Poulos Lopiccolo PC and Nagel Rice LLP on behalf of David Stern, alleges that the defendant's refrigerators’ drawers and shelving repeatedly break and fall apart within months after purchase. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Joan M. Azrack, is 2:24-cv-08204, Stern v. Electrolux Home Products, Inc.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250