South Florida Judge Steps Down
"She was firm and strong in her legal rulings."
March 05, 2020 at 02:31 PM
4 minute read
Appearing before Fourth District Court of Appeal Judge Carole Y. Taylor will soon be a thing of the past, as the esteemed jurist has announced plans to retire March 31.
Taylor became the first black woman judge to serve in her post in 1998, after also being the first black judge to serve on the Broward Circuit. Former Gov. Lawton Chiles appointed her on both occasions.
Taylor's legal career began at the Legal Aid Society of Durham County in North Carolina, where she was a staff attorney before moving to the University of Florida to serve as associate university attorney. Taylor later became an assistant public defender in Broward County and an assistant U.S. Attorney in the Southern District of Florida.
Taylor rose to the Broward County Court bench in 1991 after a stint in private practice for Miami firm Sams, Ward, Newman, Beckham & Elser. She later opened her own firm, before she was elevated to the circuit bench in 1995.
Judge Burton C. Conner described Taylor as someone who "walks the walk of everything one would want from a great appellate judge."
"She is calm, very respectful, open-minded, inquiring, collegial, and intelligent in her views and legal analysis," Conner said. "She has authored several en banc opinions with no dissents, which speaks volumes about her skills in the collaborative decision-making process of the appellate court. We will miss her greatly."
Judge Martha C. Warner said she can always count on Taylor to be well-prepared, kind and compassionate.
"And yet, she's very firm," Warner said. "When she decided a case, she was firm and strong in her legal rulings, but she wasn't afraid to change her mind when it was pointed out that she might have been wrong."
|Decades in court
Taylor chaired the court's diversity committee for several years, encouraging the retention of more diverse staff.
She also loves music, according to her colleague Warner, who said the plan is to focus on her jazz piano classes after stepping down.
"She's a lot of fun," Warner said. "I think that's wonderful—that's she's already been able to see the life after you leave this job. She already has this plan, and it just sounds wonderful to totally divorce yourself from what you do and yet be so excited in the new life you're going to have, the new experiences you're going to have. "
It's not really a retirement, the way Judge Alan O. Forst sees it, as Taylor is " still a young person" embarking on new endeavors.
"I have had the privilege of serving with Judge Taylor for seven years. That's just a blip in her judicial career of about 29 years, over 20 of them on this court," Forst said. "This longevity is hard for me to comprehend, because I view the Judge Taylor that I see now as a young person, because of her vitality and the diligent review she applies to each case."
Taylor has been the court's collegial glue, according to Forst, who has fond memories of driving her to bar functions—before she replaced her "old and beat up" car with one that wasn't made during the first Bush Administration.
"At the court, everyone has an opinion—that's what we do for a living! But we are all of one opinion concerning Judge Carole Taylor—she's awesome!" Forst said. "I'll miss working with her, but wish my friend well in the next phase of her career and life, and look forward to keeping in touch."
Fourth DCA Judge Melanie May said her fellow jurist's retirement will leave "a void in this court," which covers Palm Beach, Broward, St. Lucie, Martin, Indian River and Okeechobee counties.
"Throughout her time here, she brought a quiet, thoughtful approach to not only the cases before the court, but to our entire court family," May said. "Always one who reached out to staff with support and gratitude, she insured everyone knew they were appreciated. We wish her much happiness and lots of well-deserved time to spend with her family and friends."
Taylor was admitted to the Florida Bar in 1977, and obtained her bachelor's and law degree from the University of North Carolina.
Read more:
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2024 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View All'Disease-Causing Bacteria': Colgate and Tom’s of Maine Face Toothpaste Class Action
3 minute readFlorida-Based Law Firms Start to Lag, As New York Takes a Bigger Piece of Deals
3 minute readFowler White Burnett Opens Jacksonville Office Focused on Transportation Practice
3 minute readDisbarred Attorney Alleges ADA Violations in Lawsuit Against Miami-Dade Judges
3 minute readTrending Stories
- 1Gibson Dunn Sued By Crypto Client After Lateral Hire Causes Conflict of Interest
- 2Trump's Solicitor General Expected to 'Flip' Prelogar's Positions at Supreme Court
- 3Pharmacy Lawyers See Promise in NY Regulator's Curbs on PBM Industry
- 4Outgoing USPTO Director Kathi Vidal: ‘We All Want the Country to Be in a Better Place’
- 5Supreme Court Will Review Constitutionality Of FCC's Universal Service Fund
Who Got The Work
Michael G. Bongiorno, Andrew Scott Dulberg and Elizabeth E. Driscoll from Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr have stepped in to represent Symbotic Inc., an A.I.-enabled technology platform that focuses on increasing supply chain efficiency, and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The case, filed Oct. 2 in Massachusetts District Court by the Brown Law Firm on behalf of Stephen Austen, accuses certain officers and directors of misleading investors in regard to Symbotic's potential for margin growth by failing to disclose that the company was not equipped to timely deploy its systems or manage expenses through project delays. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Nathaniel M. Gorton, is 1:24-cv-12522, Austen v. Cohen et al.
Who Got The Work
Edmund Polubinski and Marie Killmond of Davis Polk & Wardwell have entered appearances for data platform software development company MongoDB and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The action, filed Oct. 7 in New York Southern District Court by the Brown Law Firm, accuses the company's directors and/or officers of falsely expressing confidence in the company’s restructuring of its sales incentive plan and downplaying the severity of decreases in its upfront commitments. The case is 1:24-cv-07594, Roy v. Ittycheria et al.
Who Got The Work
Amy O. Bruchs and Kurt F. Ellison of Michael Best & Friedrich have entered appearances for Epic Systems Corp. in a pending employment discrimination lawsuit. The suit was filed Sept. 7 in Wisconsin Western District Court by Levine Eisberner LLC and Siri & Glimstad on behalf of a project manager who claims that he was wrongfully terminated after applying for a religious exemption to the defendant's COVID-19 vaccine mandate. The case, assigned to U.S. Magistrate Judge Anita Marie Boor, is 3:24-cv-00630, Secker, Nathan v. Epic Systems Corporation.
Who Got The Work
David X. Sullivan, Thomas J. Finn and Gregory A. Hall from McCarter & English have entered appearances for Sunrun Installation Services in a pending civil rights lawsuit. The complaint was filed Sept. 4 in Connecticut District Court by attorney Robert M. Berke on behalf of former employee George Edward Steins, who was arrested and charged with employing an unregistered home improvement salesperson. The complaint alleges that had Sunrun informed the Connecticut Department of Consumer Protection that the plaintiff's employment had ended in 2017 and that he no longer held Sunrun's home improvement contractor license, he would not have been hit with charges, which were dismissed in May 2024. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Jeffrey A. Meyer, is 3:24-cv-01423, Steins v. Sunrun, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Greenberg Traurig shareholder Joshua L. Raskin has entered an appearance for boohoo.com UK Ltd. in a pending patent infringement lawsuit. The suit, filed Sept. 3 in Texas Eastern District Court by Rozier Hardt McDonough on behalf of Alto Dynamics, asserts five patents related to an online shopping platform. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Rodney Gilstrap, is 2:24-cv-00719, Alto Dynamics, LLC v. boohoo.com UK Limited.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250