Here's the Strategy Behind Miami Lawyers' $9 Million Win Against Johnson & Johnson
The case is one in a string of similar lawsuits across the U.S., and resulted in the second loss of 2020 for the New Jersey-based pharmaceutical giant Johnson & Johnson.
March 09, 2020 at 01:26 PM
5 minute read
Marc P. Kunen and Jose L. Becerra of The Ferraro Law Firm in Miami have secured a $9 million jury verdict for an 82-year-old woman suffering from terminal cancer, which she claimed stemmed from exposure to asbestos in Johnson & Johnson's cosmetic talcum powder.
The case is one in a string of similar lawsuits across the U.S. and resulted in the second loss of 2020 for the New Jersey-based pharmaceutical giant.
Kunen's client Blanca Moure-Cabrera had regularly used the defendant's baby powder since age 21, when she moved to South Florida from Cuba in 1959. And she was still using it in August 2018 when she was diagnosed with peritoneal mesothelioma—a cancer that forms in the lining around the abdomen. The disease is terminal and linked to the digestion of toxic asbestos fibers.
Moure-Cabrera sued in January 2019, alleging she inhaled those toxic fibers through the baby powder, which is commonly used to help prevent diaper rash on babies, and used by some adults to prevent odors, sweating or chafing.
"For over half a century she was using baby powder on herself, and she has two kids she used it on them, so it was a lot of use over the years," Kunen said.
Moure-Cabrera's lawsuit accused Johnson & Johnson of negligence and strict liability.
Johnson & Johnson has denied any links between its products and cancer, claiming there is no asbestos in its products. The defendant's website points to at least eight trials in which juries have not found a link between its products and asbestos exposure. The Securities and Exchange Commission and the Department of Justice are investigating.
Defense attorneys Ryan Cobbs of Carlton Fields in West Palm Beach and Melvin Bailey and Ursula Henninger of King and Spalding's Austin and Charlotte offices did not respond to requests for comment by deadline.
|
Related story: St. Louis Jury Issues $4.7 Billion Verdict After Trial Linking Talc to 22 Cancer Cases
Kunen and Becerra enlisted three medical experts to bolster their claims—a lab scientist, an epidemiologist and a pulmonologist/pathologist, who explained to jurors how asbestos fibers in baby powder gets into the body, and how it caused the plaintiff's disease.
In an Engle progeny-esque twist, the plaintiffs team were able to use internal documents to demonstrate that, since the 1970s, executives at Johnson & Johnson knew that there were trace amounts of asbestos in talc obtained from Italy and Vermont but didn't tell customers. The documents also revealed different testing methods the company used.
"I think that was helpful to support some of the medical and scientific opinions some of our experts had, as we used different Johnson & Johnson documents where similar things were being discussed," Kunen said.
The biggest challenge for the plaintiff was deciding how much information on asbestos and mesothelioma was too much for jurors.
Kunen's takeaway: "Simplify everything, and try not to get in the weeds on too many aspects of the medicine and the science."
|'Her hero'
Plaintiff Moure-Cabrera took to the stand, telling jurors about how cancer changed her life. Before getting sick, she had worked as a special education teacher for Miami-Dade County after obtaining her degree in education from Cuba. After raising her two sons as a single mom, Moure-Cabrera obtained a degree in special education from Barry University in Miami Shores, and a master's degree in guidance counseling from St. Thomas University in Miami Gardens.
"She deals with pain on a daily basis. She's taking pain medication every day and has lost a lot of weight," Kunen said. "What she was describing on the stand is she's unrecognizable from how she used to look, so it's affected her mentally."
Kunen said Moure-Cabrera used to be particularly outgoing, often spending time with friends she'd made through decades of teaching in Homestead. But now, she dislikes being seen in public.
One of Moure-Cabrera's sons has moved in with her and told jurors how roles have reversed.
"He helps bathe her from time to time, gets her dressed. Whatever she needs, he gets it," Kunen said. "He's been at every single doctor's appointment, so he's been her hero."
It took jurors just 45 minutes to find that there was asbestos in the baby powder the plaintiff used, and to find the defendant negligent in causing her cancer. They awarded $3 million in past medical expenses and $6 million in past and future pain and suffering.
Although the verdict is a win for the plaintiff, Kunen said the inescapable truth is that Moure-Cabrera will die of her illness.
Johnson & Johnson still faces thousands of lawsuits over alleged asbestos contamination across the country. The defense in this case has not made a filing in response to the verdict.
|Read the verdict:
Case: Blanca Moure-Cabrera v. Johnson & Johnson Consumer and Johnson & Johnson
Case No.: 19-000727-CA42
Description: Products liability
Filing date: Jan. 9, 2019
Verdict date: Feb. 27, 2020
Judge: Miami-Dade Circuit Judge Jose Rodriguez
Plaintiffs attorneys: Marc Kunen and Jose Becerra, The Ferraro Law Firm, Miami
Defense attorneys: Ryan Cobbs, Carlton Fields, West Palm Beach; Melvin Bailey and Ursula Henninger, King & Spalding, Austin and Charlotte
Verdict amount: $9 million
Read more:
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2024 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View All'They Got All Bent Out of Shape:' Parkland Lawyers Clash With Each Other
Tampa Jury Returns $5.8M Verdict Against Insurer Who Denied Coverage
2 minute readEven the Chief Judge Noted the Cost of This Broward Case
Marriott's $52M Data Breach Settlement Points to Emerging Trend
Law Firms Mentioned
Trending Stories
- 1Democratic State AGs Revel in Role as Last Line of Defense Against Trump Agenda
- 2Decision of the Day: Split Circuit Panel Bars Enforcement of Ivory Law's 'Display Restriction' on Antique Group Members
- 3Chiesa Shahinian Bolsters Corporate Practice With 5 From Newark Boutique
- 42 Years After Paul Plevin Merger, Quarles & Brady’s Revenue Up More than 13%
- 5Trade Fixtures In New York Eminent Domain Cases - What Qualifies and How Are They Valued?
Who Got The Work
Michael G. Bongiorno, Andrew Scott Dulberg and Elizabeth E. Driscoll from Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr have stepped in to represent Symbotic Inc., an A.I.-enabled technology platform that focuses on increasing supply chain efficiency, and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The case, filed Oct. 2 in Massachusetts District Court by the Brown Law Firm on behalf of Stephen Austen, accuses certain officers and directors of misleading investors in regard to Symbotic's potential for margin growth by failing to disclose that the company was not equipped to timely deploy its systems or manage expenses through project delays. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Nathaniel M. Gorton, is 1:24-cv-12522, Austen v. Cohen et al.
Who Got The Work
Edmund Polubinski and Marie Killmond of Davis Polk & Wardwell have entered appearances for data platform software development company MongoDB and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The action, filed Oct. 7 in New York Southern District Court by the Brown Law Firm, accuses the company's directors and/or officers of falsely expressing confidence in the company’s restructuring of its sales incentive plan and downplaying the severity of decreases in its upfront commitments. The case is 1:24-cv-07594, Roy v. Ittycheria et al.
Who Got The Work
Amy O. Bruchs and Kurt F. Ellison of Michael Best & Friedrich have entered appearances for Epic Systems Corp. in a pending employment discrimination lawsuit. The suit was filed Sept. 7 in Wisconsin Western District Court by Levine Eisberner LLC and Siri & Glimstad on behalf of a project manager who claims that he was wrongfully terminated after applying for a religious exemption to the defendant's COVID-19 vaccine mandate. The case, assigned to U.S. Magistrate Judge Anita Marie Boor, is 3:24-cv-00630, Secker, Nathan v. Epic Systems Corporation.
Who Got The Work
David X. Sullivan, Thomas J. Finn and Gregory A. Hall from McCarter & English have entered appearances for Sunrun Installation Services in a pending civil rights lawsuit. The complaint was filed Sept. 4 in Connecticut District Court by attorney Robert M. Berke on behalf of former employee George Edward Steins, who was arrested and charged with employing an unregistered home improvement salesperson. The complaint alleges that had Sunrun informed the Connecticut Department of Consumer Protection that the plaintiff's employment had ended in 2017 and that he no longer held Sunrun's home improvement contractor license, he would not have been hit with charges, which were dismissed in May 2024. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Jeffrey A. Meyer, is 3:24-cv-01423, Steins v. Sunrun, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Greenberg Traurig shareholder Joshua L. Raskin has entered an appearance for boohoo.com UK Ltd. in a pending patent infringement lawsuit. The suit, filed Sept. 3 in Texas Eastern District Court by Rozier Hardt McDonough on behalf of Alto Dynamics, asserts five patents related to an online shopping platform. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Rodney Gilstrap, is 2:24-cv-00719, Alto Dynamics, LLC v. boohoo.com UK Limited.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250