'Watch and Prepare': Florida Courts Brace for Coronavirus
"With so many moving parts involved, attorneys, litigants, clerks of court, security and the Broward Sheriff's Office, this will take much planning, but we are committed to operate the courts, albeit on an emergency scale, should closure of the courts become a reality," said Broward Chief Judge Jack Tuter.
March 09, 2020 at 03:40 PM
5 minute read
As fears about the spread of COVID-19 grip the world, a common theme has emerged in the response of South Florida state and federal courts: watching, planning, waiting—and sanitizing.
The Florida Supreme Court said it's following its pandemic plans after Gov. Ron DeSantis declared a public health emergency. Having wrapped up oral arguments for March, the court will consider any precautions for April's arguments in the coming weeks.
Spokesman Craig Waters encouraged use of the court's online broadcasts and electronic filing system, while discussions with governing authorities continue.
"During this emergency, we ask the public and the legal community to take advantage of digital access to the Florida Supreme Court," Waters said.
Miami-Dade Circuit has introduced hand sanitizer dispensers in all courthouse lobbies and says its emergency management team has been meeting with local partners and government officials to discuss preparation and response strategies.
The team is working with Miami-Dade County's Internal Services Department—responsible for maintenance of county-owned property—to arrange more frequent cleaning of shared workspaces and bathrooms, and "high-touch" surfaces like tables, doorknobs and collection containers at security checkpoints.
"All Eleventh Circuit continuity of operations plans, which are implemented any time there is a disruption to normal court operations, are being reviewed and appropriate steps are being taken to ensure these plans remain ready to implement immediately should the need arise," said Miami-Dade Circuit spokeswoman Eunice Sigler.
Sigler said the court is encouraging staff to follow official advice and has not yet made moves to encourage attendance by phone over in person.
"These procedures, among others, will be reviewed and adapted as needed based on any new developments and recommendations issued by health authorities regarding the coronavirus," Sigler said.
|
Read what courts across the U.S. are doing: As Coronavirus Spreads, Legal Industry Shifts into Crisis Management Mode
|
Uncertainty about inmates
Broward Circuit Chief Judge Jack Tuter said his court is also following the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention's guidance and has met several times to discuss the virus, most recently sitting down with stakeholders Friday. The Office of State Courts Administrator is taking the lead.
Tuter said the court is considering conducting some proceedings via video or telephone conferences, prioritizing first appearances, domestic violence and some criminal court hearings. The court might also use teleconferencing for civil and family cases.
"What we do not know is how the jail may be affected by the virus," Tuter said. "If no inmate movement is permitted or limited movement based on a quarantine plan, it will be difficult to implement a plan. Since we just began discussions in the past few days, we have much work ahead."
Broward courthouses will soon feature more hand santizer dispensers, according to Tuter, who said maintenance staff will sanitize frequently used areas like escalators and elevators, and court personnel might be asked to wipe down door handles.
"I anticipate more steps on this in the near future. Because of the uncertainty of how this virus may impact large public buildings such as our courthouses, we are working on preliminary plans to resume court functions if the courthouses are closed for any extended period of time," Tuter said. "With so many moving parts involved, attorneys, litigants, clerks of court, security and the Broward Sheriff's Office, this will take much planning, but we are committed to operate the courts, albeit on an emergency scale, should closure of the courts become a reality."
|Waiting game
It's a similar story at Palm Beach Circuit Court, where spokeswoman Debra Oats said staff are following guidelines, meeting with local partners to draft plans in case of disruption and staying in contact with the state supreme court's emergency team.
"The plan for court events will depend on the status/presence of COVID-19 in the county and if and how it affects the public, the court staff and court partners," Oats said.
Oats said the court has also bought cleaning products, gels and masks, and is keeping employees updated on prevention strategies.
The court administrator's office for the Southern District of Florida said it's weighing its options, including restricting access of jurors and visitors at higher risk of catching the virus, and is in talks with the U.S. Marshals Service about moving at-risk prisoners or having them appear via VideoLink if necessary.
The Florida Bar said it's "closely monitoring" what's happening at the Florida Supreme Court, the Office of the State Courts Administrator and the Florida Court Public Information Officers, while leaders and staff are watching for travel restrictions or advisories, in case that affects meetings.
The bar said it's "prepared to assist in communicating court-related information to attorneys and the public," and has published an article in which Chief Justice Charles Canady urged the public to "watch and prepare."
Read more:
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2024 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllSecond Circuit Ruling Expands VPPA Scope: What Organizations Need to Know
6 minute read'They Got All Bent Out of Shape:' Parkland Lawyers Clash With Each Other
Courts of Appeal Conflicted Over Rule 1.442(c)(3) When Claims for Damages Involve a Husband and Wife
Families Settle Court Battle Over Who Owns Parkland Killer's Name, Likeness
4 minute readTrending Stories
- 1Dallas Jury Awards $98.65M in Botham Jean Killing by Dallas Officer
- 2In Talc Bankruptcy, Andy Birchfield Skipped His Deposition. Could He Face Sanctions?
- 3Pharmaceutical Patents: Benefits and Challenges
- 4Where Do Web-Tracking Class Actions Belong? 8th Circuit Weighs the Issue
- 5While Data Breaches May Lead to Years of Legal Battles, Cyberattacks Can be Prevented
Who Got The Work
Michael G. Bongiorno, Andrew Scott Dulberg and Elizabeth E. Driscoll from Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr have stepped in to represent Symbotic Inc., an A.I.-enabled technology platform that focuses on increasing supply chain efficiency, and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The case, filed Oct. 2 in Massachusetts District Court by the Brown Law Firm on behalf of Stephen Austen, accuses certain officers and directors of misleading investors in regard to Symbotic's potential for margin growth by failing to disclose that the company was not equipped to timely deploy its systems or manage expenses through project delays. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Nathaniel M. Gorton, is 1:24-cv-12522, Austen v. Cohen et al.
Who Got The Work
Edmund Polubinski and Marie Killmond of Davis Polk & Wardwell have entered appearances for data platform software development company MongoDB and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The action, filed Oct. 7 in New York Southern District Court by the Brown Law Firm, accuses the company's directors and/or officers of falsely expressing confidence in the company’s restructuring of its sales incentive plan and downplaying the severity of decreases in its upfront commitments. The case is 1:24-cv-07594, Roy v. Ittycheria et al.
Who Got The Work
Amy O. Bruchs and Kurt F. Ellison of Michael Best & Friedrich have entered appearances for Epic Systems Corp. in a pending employment discrimination lawsuit. The suit was filed Sept. 7 in Wisconsin Western District Court by Levine Eisberner LLC and Siri & Glimstad on behalf of a project manager who claims that he was wrongfully terminated after applying for a religious exemption to the defendant's COVID-19 vaccine mandate. The case, assigned to U.S. Magistrate Judge Anita Marie Boor, is 3:24-cv-00630, Secker, Nathan v. Epic Systems Corporation.
Who Got The Work
David X. Sullivan, Thomas J. Finn and Gregory A. Hall from McCarter & English have entered appearances for Sunrun Installation Services in a pending civil rights lawsuit. The complaint was filed Sept. 4 in Connecticut District Court by attorney Robert M. Berke on behalf of former employee George Edward Steins, who was arrested and charged with employing an unregistered home improvement salesperson. The complaint alleges that had Sunrun informed the Connecticut Department of Consumer Protection that the plaintiff's employment had ended in 2017 and that he no longer held Sunrun's home improvement contractor license, he would not have been hit with charges, which were dismissed in May 2024. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Jeffrey A. Meyer, is 3:24-cv-01423, Steins v. Sunrun, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Greenberg Traurig shareholder Joshua L. Raskin has entered an appearance for boohoo.com UK Ltd. in a pending patent infringement lawsuit. The suit, filed Sept. 3 in Texas Eastern District Court by Rozier Hardt McDonough on behalf of Alto Dynamics, asserts five patents related to an online shopping platform. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Rodney Gilstrap, is 2:24-cv-00719, Alto Dynamics, LLC v. boohoo.com UK Limited.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250