Class Action Filed Against China Over COVID-19 Outbreak
The suit, filed Thursday, alleges Chinese authorities "proverbially put their head in the sand" for their own economic self interest, sparking the global COVID-19 outbreak.
March 13, 2020 at 04:23 PM
5 minute read
There is a lot of blame to go around for the coronavirus outbreak, but one plaintiffs attorney took his gripes to court, filing a nationwide class action against the People's Republic of China for causing the global pandemic.
In a lawsuit filed Thursday, attorney Matthew Moore, of Boca Raton, Florida's The Berman Law Group, alleged China's failure to report and contain the virus more quickly, or disclose the actual number of cases, created "essentially a giant Petri dish" in the region near Wuhan, sparking the global COVID-19 outbreak. The case alleges claims of negligence, emotional distress, public nuisance and strict liability for "conducting ultrahazardous activity."
"The PRC and the other defendants knew that COVID-19 was dangerous and capable of causing a pandemic, yet slowly acted, proverbially put their head in the sand, and/or covered it up for their own economic self-interest," the complaint says. "The defendants' conduct has caused and will continue to cause personal injuries and deaths, as well as other damages."
The plaintiffs are four Florida residents and a training center for baseball players in Boca Raton. In addition to China, the suit names various Chinese health and emergency departments, the Hubei province and the city of Wuhan, where COVID-19 first emerged in late December. The suit cites various exceptions to the Foreign Sovereign Immunities Act, such as acts outside the United States dealing with a "commercial activity," and for personal injury and death.
None of the plaintiffs has contracted coronavirus, Moore said, but he anticipated adding more in the coming week "with more physical injuries." Among the injuries cited in the complaint are "psychological trauma."
"Given what was happening in the past few days in the United States, it seemed to the firm and Russell Berman, the head of the firm, we weren't going to get any better," said Moore, who works in Los Angeles. "It seems like chaos is about to unfold on the United States. We wanted to address it, and get it out there."
The class action, filed in the U.S. District Court for the Southern District of Florida, comes the same day as a shareholder class action brought against Norwegian Cruise Lines and at least four individual lawsuits filed by passengers of the Princess Cruise Lines who began disembarking this week after a week-long quarantine off the coast of California.
As of Friday, there were more than 132,000 cases of coronavirus worldwide, including nearly 5,000 deaths. Most of the cases were in China, where COVID-19 first surfaced in late December in the city of Wuhan, in China's Hubei province, but more than 120 countries have reported cases.
The World Health Organization declared the COVID-19 outbreak a global pandemic this week, and President Donald Trump declared a national emergency Friday. The United States has more than 1,600 cases, including 41 deaths.
"The exponential rise in cases, even reaching people like Tom Hanks and his wife Rita Wilson, and a professional basketball Donovan Mitchell of the Utah Jazz, as of March 11, demonstrates that COVID-19 spreads easily and rapidly," Moore's lawsuit says. "Businesses are suffering because of both disruptions to their supply chains and a scarcity of patrons and customers. The public is in a panic, wiping out stocks of toilet paper, hand sanitizers, face masks, and other items."
In the same vein as other reactions to the coronavirus, the lawsuit has a theory as to how COVID-19 got out of control: a biological weapons research lab in Wuhan run by the Chinese government that "deals with the deadliest of viruses." The suit says the lab either allowed COVID-19 to escape from its facility "because of lax controls," or allowed its researchers to sell lab animals to the marketplace, "as researchers have been known to do in China, instead of cremating them as PRC law requires."
"This lab deals with coronavirus and, if they released it, then, yes, they're responsible," Moore said. "By Jan. 1, there were eight doctors and scientists in Wuhan who wanted to tell the world and they were muzzled. On Jan. 3, they knew there was easy human-to-human transmission, yet they kept telling their own people there's nothing to worry about. By Jan. 9, they knew this was a lethal issue."
He added: "These are things if they had taken measures earlier, when they knew what was going on, maybe we wouldn't have a pandemic."
The nationwide class includes millions of people and businesses with "injury, damage, and loss related to the outbreak of the COVID-19 virus," including "discernible physical manifestations and injuries of trauma from the negligent conduct, including, but not limited, to physical pains, headaches, anxiety, and insomnia."
When asked about the amount of damages, Moore replied, "If you start talking about numbers of what could happen in the United States, it gets into a number that sounds fanciful. It could easily be in the billions."
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2024 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllEven the Chief Judge Noted the Cost of This Broward Case
Appeals Court Affirms Everglades Foundation Scientist Conviction
Judge Cannon Says She Has No Relationship With Trump and Won't Step Down From Attempted Assassination Case
Trending Stories
- 1Infant Formula Judge Sanctions Kirkland's Jim Hurst: 'Overtly Crossed the Lines'
- 2Abbott, Mead Johnson Win Defense Verdict Over Preemie Infant Formula
- 3Preparing Your Law Firm for 2025: Smart Ways to Embrace AI & Other Technologies
- 4Greenberg Traurig Initiates String of Suits Following JPMorgan Chase's 'Infinite Money Glitch'
- 5Data-Driven Legal Strategies
Who Got The Work
Michael G. Bongiorno, Andrew Scott Dulberg and Elizabeth E. Driscoll from Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr have stepped in to represent Symbotic Inc., an A.I.-enabled technology platform that focuses on increasing supply chain efficiency, and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The case, filed Oct. 2 in Massachusetts District Court by the Brown Law Firm on behalf of Stephen Austen, accuses certain officers and directors of misleading investors in regard to Symbotic's potential for margin growth by failing to disclose that the company was not equipped to timely deploy its systems or manage expenses through project delays. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Nathaniel M. Gorton, is 1:24-cv-12522, Austen v. Cohen et al.
Who Got The Work
Edmund Polubinski and Marie Killmond of Davis Polk & Wardwell have entered appearances for data platform software development company MongoDB and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The action, filed Oct. 7 in New York Southern District Court by the Brown Law Firm, accuses the company's directors and/or officers of falsely expressing confidence in the company’s restructuring of its sales incentive plan and downplaying the severity of decreases in its upfront commitments. The case is 1:24-cv-07594, Roy v. Ittycheria et al.
Who Got The Work
Amy O. Bruchs and Kurt F. Ellison of Michael Best & Friedrich have entered appearances for Epic Systems Corp. in a pending employment discrimination lawsuit. The suit was filed Sept. 7 in Wisconsin Western District Court by Levine Eisberner LLC and Siri & Glimstad on behalf of a project manager who claims that he was wrongfully terminated after applying for a religious exemption to the defendant's COVID-19 vaccine mandate. The case, assigned to U.S. Magistrate Judge Anita Marie Boor, is 3:24-cv-00630, Secker, Nathan v. Epic Systems Corporation.
Who Got The Work
David X. Sullivan, Thomas J. Finn and Gregory A. Hall from McCarter & English have entered appearances for Sunrun Installation Services in a pending civil rights lawsuit. The complaint was filed Sept. 4 in Connecticut District Court by attorney Robert M. Berke on behalf of former employee George Edward Steins, who was arrested and charged with employing an unregistered home improvement salesperson. The complaint alleges that had Sunrun informed the Connecticut Department of Consumer Protection that the plaintiff's employment had ended in 2017 and that he no longer held Sunrun's home improvement contractor license, he would not have been hit with charges, which were dismissed in May 2024. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Jeffrey A. Meyer, is 3:24-cv-01423, Steins v. Sunrun, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Greenberg Traurig shareholder Joshua L. Raskin has entered an appearance for boohoo.com UK Ltd. in a pending patent infringement lawsuit. The suit, filed Sept. 3 in Texas Eastern District Court by Rozier Hardt McDonough on behalf of Alto Dynamics, asserts five patents related to an online shopping platform. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Rodney Gilstrap, is 2:24-cv-00719, Alto Dynamics, LLC v. boohoo.com UK Limited.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250