Expect Flurry of Bankruptcy Filings With Coronavirus Slowdown
Potential clients are reaching out to bankruptcy attorneys to assess the need for business filings.
March 16, 2020 at 04:16 PM
4 minute read
Bankruptcy attorneys expected to get calls as the coronavirus pandemic swiftly slowed the economy — and they were right.
"It's been incredible. It's gone from the TV to my front office door with a speed that I just never experienced," said Luis Salazar, partner at Salazar Law in Coral Gables.
Small businesses and big companies are faced with dwindling foot traffic, shorter hours and occupancy limits enforced by cities plus a slowdown in Chinese imports. They are weighing their options. On the real estate front, commercial landlords are looking closely at their tenants.
"Landlords have a lot of protections under the Bankruptcy Code," said Jeffrey Snyder, a Bilzin Sumberg partner in Miami.
Six potential clients have reached out to Salazar since the coronavirus outbreak, including hospitality businesses and wholesalers relying on Chinese imports. Snyder and Glenn Moses, a shareholder at Genovese Joblove & Battista in Miami, also said their firms have been getting inquiries but declined to disclose how many and the types of companies seeking advice.
"We are living in uncertain financial times, and that's leading to economic costs," Moses said. "We are counseling our clients on a lot of options, including restructuring. We are seeing an uptick in discussions, and we are starting to add strategic plans with our clients, and we are certainly gearing up and prepared."
Bankruptcy is a last resort after all other options have been explored, including tapping lines of credit. Still, that might not be easy or cheap and depends on the amount and quality of collateral.
"There are some lenders who are much more aggressive of course who might finance accounts receivable or other cash flow for really in some cases very high rates so that each will have liquidity," Salazar said. "It's possible to get additional credit under the circumstances. how far along and how precarious of a financial situation of the borrower."
It's difficult to pinpoint which businesses are more likely to seek bankruptcy protection. A large well-heeled company could weather the storm, but if it's already facing headwinds, it might be more likely to file. And a small business isn't necessarily more vulnerable. The corner mom-and-pop convenience stores and restaurants might still be drawing shoppers.
A good rule of thumb is that businesses that sell necessities like groceries are more likely to retain good patronage, Salazar said. But those already struggling, such as retailers feeling the effects of e-commerce growth, could be seeking protection.
Landlord Protections
Landlords should be exploring their options, said Aleida Martinez Molina, partner at Weiss Serota Helfman Cole & Bierman.
"The bankruptcy code is complicated, provisions relating to commercial landlord situations even more so," she said.
Under Chapter 11 bankruptcy reorganizations, tenants have 180 days from the filing date plus a 90-day extension to decide if they want to keep or reject a lease, said Moses. Under Chapter 7 liquidations, that time period is 60 days, after which a lease is rejected.
Tenants won't be entirely off the hook from paying rent.
"Ultimately after the 60th day of the case, the court is going to compel a tenant to pay rent and comply with other terms of the lease or the landlord is going to be in a position to get that space back," Snyder said.
Court opinions differ on the rent and other lease obligations in the 60-day period right after a tenant filing, he added.
Florida counted 155 cases of COVID-19 by Monday afternoon.
Stock markets nosedived Monday after the Federal Reserve brought its key interest rate to nearly zero in an emergency move Sunday.
A Moody's Analytics economist projected that if the pandemic and related business closures stretch into summer and U.S. cases shoot above 100,000, a recession could be in store.
Attorneys say landlords would be better off renegotiating leases instead of ending them since they would still generate rental income, albeit lower.
"It's hard to imagine you are going to have a lot of retailers and restaurants, who are going to be looking to occupy the space during this constrained time period," Snyder said.
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2024 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllFowler White Burnett Opens Jacksonville Office Focused on Transportation Practice
3 minute readHow Much Coverage Do You Really Have? Valuation and Loss Settlement Provisions in Commercial Property Policies
10 minute readThe Importance of 'Speaking Up' Regarding Lease Renewal Deadlines for Commercial Tenants and Landlords
6 minute readMeet the Attorneys—and Little Known Law—Behind $20M Miami Dispute
Law Firms Mentioned
Trending Stories
- 1Call for Nominations: Elite Trial Lawyers 2025
- 2Senate Judiciary Dems Release Report on Supreme Court Ethics
- 3Senate Confirms Last 2 of Biden's California Judicial Nominees
- 4Morrison & Foerster Doles Out Year-End and Special Bonuses, Raises Base Compensation for Associates
- 5Tom Girardi to Surrender to Federal Authorities on Jan. 7
Who Got The Work
Michael G. Bongiorno, Andrew Scott Dulberg and Elizabeth E. Driscoll from Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr have stepped in to represent Symbotic Inc., an A.I.-enabled technology platform that focuses on increasing supply chain efficiency, and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The case, filed Oct. 2 in Massachusetts District Court by the Brown Law Firm on behalf of Stephen Austen, accuses certain officers and directors of misleading investors in regard to Symbotic's potential for margin growth by failing to disclose that the company was not equipped to timely deploy its systems or manage expenses through project delays. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Nathaniel M. Gorton, is 1:24-cv-12522, Austen v. Cohen et al.
Who Got The Work
Edmund Polubinski and Marie Killmond of Davis Polk & Wardwell have entered appearances for data platform software development company MongoDB and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The action, filed Oct. 7 in New York Southern District Court by the Brown Law Firm, accuses the company's directors and/or officers of falsely expressing confidence in the company’s restructuring of its sales incentive plan and downplaying the severity of decreases in its upfront commitments. The case is 1:24-cv-07594, Roy v. Ittycheria et al.
Who Got The Work
Amy O. Bruchs and Kurt F. Ellison of Michael Best & Friedrich have entered appearances for Epic Systems Corp. in a pending employment discrimination lawsuit. The suit was filed Sept. 7 in Wisconsin Western District Court by Levine Eisberner LLC and Siri & Glimstad on behalf of a project manager who claims that he was wrongfully terminated after applying for a religious exemption to the defendant's COVID-19 vaccine mandate. The case, assigned to U.S. Magistrate Judge Anita Marie Boor, is 3:24-cv-00630, Secker, Nathan v. Epic Systems Corporation.
Who Got The Work
David X. Sullivan, Thomas J. Finn and Gregory A. Hall from McCarter & English have entered appearances for Sunrun Installation Services in a pending civil rights lawsuit. The complaint was filed Sept. 4 in Connecticut District Court by attorney Robert M. Berke on behalf of former employee George Edward Steins, who was arrested and charged with employing an unregistered home improvement salesperson. The complaint alleges that had Sunrun informed the Connecticut Department of Consumer Protection that the plaintiff's employment had ended in 2017 and that he no longer held Sunrun's home improvement contractor license, he would not have been hit with charges, which were dismissed in May 2024. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Jeffrey A. Meyer, is 3:24-cv-01423, Steins v. Sunrun, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Greenberg Traurig shareholder Joshua L. Raskin has entered an appearance for boohoo.com UK Ltd. in a pending patent infringement lawsuit. The suit, filed Sept. 3 in Texas Eastern District Court by Rozier Hardt McDonough on behalf of Alto Dynamics, asserts five patents related to an online shopping platform. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Rodney Gilstrap, is 2:24-cv-00719, Alto Dynamics, LLC v. boohoo.com UK Limited.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250