'Virus Harassment': In the Workplace, It's Not Just COVID-19 You Have to Worry About
What's going on here? Panic. What does that mean for employers? Bring it under control or bring on the lawyers, because you could end up in court.
March 16, 2020 at 02:56 PM
5 minute read
A woman with Asian features wearing a face mask is attacked in the New York subway by a young man who is videoed screaming "diseased b—–." A 59-year-old Asian man is kicked from behind and knocked down on the street, also in New York, by a teen who allegedly yelled "f—ing Chinese coronavirus" as he attacked. A pupil of Chinese heritage in Miami-Dade County is teased by her classmates as "eating bats," reducing her to tears.
The above were widely reported in legitimate media, except the last, which I know of from a witness. They are not workplace anecdotes, but here are a couple from my own personal knowledge:
Search Twitter for "Lysol coworker" and you'll get a never-ending stream of people complaining that they should spray their work area, that they want to spray their coughing co-worker, or that they have themselves been sprayed by a rampaging colleague with an aerosol. Employees demand that their boss send another employee home because that person's child attends a large school where a worker's teen child might have been exposed—not infected, just exposed —to COVID-19 on a cruise.
Now, think about that last one: a worker on a ship carrying maybe 5,000 people has the virus; a teen was on that ship for a few days—no idea whether the teen was ever within 100 yards of the infected person; the teen's mother works in a school with thousands of students and teachers; your employee's child attends that school—no idea whether the child was ever within 100 yards of the school worker; and your employee's co-workers demand that the employee be sent home because they fear that employee could infect them.
I'm no epidemiologist, but five degrees of separation—with a couple of those separations involving a one-in-thousands chance of close contact—barely even qualifies for the Kevin Bacon game.
What's going on here? Panic. What does that mean for employers? Bring it under control or bring on the lawyers, because you could end up in court.
First, and obviously, harassing or singling out employees of Asian heritage can expose the employer to a discrimination lawsuit. National origin is a protected status under the federal and state civil rights acts and under many if not all local civil rights ordinances. The employer is liable for that kind of harassment by co-workers if the employer knows or should know that it is occurring and does not stop it. This kind of liability can arise even if only a single supervisor is or should be aware and does not step in.
The harassment does not have to be sustained—a single instance could result in liability if it were bad enough.
This kind of behavior can also result in liability for infliction of emotional distress and similar claims. Spraying someone with a disinfectant could be assault, even if no actual injury occurs. Indiscriminate spraying of chemicals into the air also might exacerbate an employee's pre-existing respiratory condition or allergies, which can also result in employer liability.
Of more overarching concern, however, is tolerating the demonization of employees by other employees. Just because "coughing" is not a protected status under the civil rights laws doesn't mean it's OK to persecute someone or for an employer to permit it.
Once started down this slippery slope, there's no logical end to it. I have heard someone declare that they don't want to associate with someone because that person's relative attends a program that the first person thinks is not as sanitary as they'd like. If these two are your employees and the relative is, for example, disabled and the place is where they're cared for, then you have a possible ADA associational claim against you. The claim would not arise from coronavirus, but from the second employee's association with their disabled relative—this is a far slide down that slope, but it can happen just that easily.
Questions of liability aside, employers would do well to remind employees in such situations of two things.
First, the harassers today could easily be themselves sick—and harassed—tomorrow. This virus shoe is going to be on the other foot of a lot of people.
Second, we all are going to come out the other side of this, sooner rather than later, we hope. Meanness, harassment and hurt feelings now will not be forgotten later.
Employers who act to stop or prevent this sort of bad action now will reap the rewards later. Those who don't will reap something else.
Attorney David C. Miller is board-certified in labor and employment law by the Florida Bar. He is a shareholder in the Miami offices of Bryant Miller Olive and represents employers. Before becoming a lawyer, Miller was a newspaper editor and reporter for more than a decade.
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2024 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllNavigating Claims Under the Florida Telephone Solicitation Act and Florida Telemarketing Act
4 minute readSecond Circuit Ruling Expands VPPA Scope: What Organizations Need to Know
6 minute readTrending Stories
Who Got The Work
Michael G. Bongiorno, Andrew Scott Dulberg and Elizabeth E. Driscoll from Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr have stepped in to represent Symbotic Inc., an A.I.-enabled technology platform that focuses on increasing supply chain efficiency, and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The case, filed Oct. 2 in Massachusetts District Court by the Brown Law Firm on behalf of Stephen Austen, accuses certain officers and directors of misleading investors in regard to Symbotic's potential for margin growth by failing to disclose that the company was not equipped to timely deploy its systems or manage expenses through project delays. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Nathaniel M. Gorton, is 1:24-cv-12522, Austen v. Cohen et al.
Who Got The Work
Edmund Polubinski and Marie Killmond of Davis Polk & Wardwell have entered appearances for data platform software development company MongoDB and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The action, filed Oct. 7 in New York Southern District Court by the Brown Law Firm, accuses the company's directors and/or officers of falsely expressing confidence in the company’s restructuring of its sales incentive plan and downplaying the severity of decreases in its upfront commitments. The case is 1:24-cv-07594, Roy v. Ittycheria et al.
Who Got The Work
Amy O. Bruchs and Kurt F. Ellison of Michael Best & Friedrich have entered appearances for Epic Systems Corp. in a pending employment discrimination lawsuit. The suit was filed Sept. 7 in Wisconsin Western District Court by Levine Eisberner LLC and Siri & Glimstad on behalf of a project manager who claims that he was wrongfully terminated after applying for a religious exemption to the defendant's COVID-19 vaccine mandate. The case, assigned to U.S. Magistrate Judge Anita Marie Boor, is 3:24-cv-00630, Secker, Nathan v. Epic Systems Corporation.
Who Got The Work
David X. Sullivan, Thomas J. Finn and Gregory A. Hall from McCarter & English have entered appearances for Sunrun Installation Services in a pending civil rights lawsuit. The complaint was filed Sept. 4 in Connecticut District Court by attorney Robert M. Berke on behalf of former employee George Edward Steins, who was arrested and charged with employing an unregistered home improvement salesperson. The complaint alleges that had Sunrun informed the Connecticut Department of Consumer Protection that the plaintiff's employment had ended in 2017 and that he no longer held Sunrun's home improvement contractor license, he would not have been hit with charges, which were dismissed in May 2024. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Jeffrey A. Meyer, is 3:24-cv-01423, Steins v. Sunrun, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Greenberg Traurig shareholder Joshua L. Raskin has entered an appearance for boohoo.com UK Ltd. in a pending patent infringement lawsuit. The suit, filed Sept. 3 in Texas Eastern District Court by Rozier Hardt McDonough on behalf of Alto Dynamics, asserts five patents related to an online shopping platform. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Rodney Gilstrap, is 2:24-cv-00719, Alto Dynamics, LLC v. boohoo.com UK Limited.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250