'No Commute. No Traffic': Pluses, Minuses as Lawyers Log on Remotely
Stuck at home, lawyers are adjusting to the new normal of having to work remotely, as courts and firms close their doors to help slow the spreading of the coronavirus.
March 17, 2020 at 03:02 PM
4 minute read
As more and more law firms in South Florida transition to remote work amid the coronavirus outbreak, attorneys report advantages, challenges and setbacks as they embrace the new normal.
One of the benefits for Paul A. Shelowitz, a partner at Stroock & Stroock & Lavan, is having two additional hours in his work day.
"No commute," Shelowitz said. "No traffic."
Shelowitz is still in court — telephonically. On Monday, he was in a multi-hour telephonic evidentiary hearing before Eleventh Circuit Judge Spencer Eig, who he said is attempting to avoid a huge backlog.
"There's a judge that is trying to move cases along," Shelowitz said. "He gave us filing deadlines, proposed orders in 10 days."
Still, Shelowitz is worried the effects of the coronavirus are going to set litigation back several months. A real challenge for him is the schedule disruption, amid cancellations of hearings, depositions and trials.
'Advocacy suffers'
Jacqueline Calderín, managing partner at Agentis, suggested attorneys miss nuances during telephonic hearings, especially if they don't know the judges presiding over those hearings.
"I know the bankruptcy judges. They know me. You go in there knowing what you are going to encounter for the most part," Calderin said. "When you are practicing in state court, like my litigation partners, there are so many judges and there are thousands of lawyers, that I think you lose that personal connection, like body language, inflection. Your advocacy suffers."
The real hindrance, Calderin said, are evidentiary hearings because the judge needs to examine the demeanor of the witness.
The coronavirus has led law firms and courts to either encourage or instruct their employees to work from home. The move is to slow the rapidly spreading coronavirus outbreak.
As of Tuesday morning, officials reported more than 170 confirmed coronavirus cases among Florida residents, according to the Florida Department of Health—an increase of about 30 confirmed cases of the coronavirus affecting Florida residents within the last 12 hours.
The health concerns have prompted courts across the country and in South Florida to close and embrace telephonic hearings. For instance, the Miami-Dade County Courthouse, where Judge Eig sits, has shut down facilities until March 27, with employees working from home.
The United States Bankruptcy Court for the Southern District of Florida is using technology like Court Solutions and CourtCall. Enrolling with these conference telephone systems is required to participate in hearings before the Bankruptcy Court. Otherwise, attorneys must file a motion to submit the case on their papers.
New software licenses
Stuck at home, Shelowitz is not having any problems accessing those types of technologies as well as the system portal for his firm.
Stroock & Stroock & Lavan has undergone testing in preparation for the transition, including conducting a comprehensive stress test last week, in which lawyers from around the country simultaneously logged into the system.
Jeffrey C. Schneider, founding partner at Levine Kellogg Lehman Schneider + Grossman, said the attorneys are now logging on to the same systems, just remotely. Initially, the firm did not have as many licenses for remote use as it needed to accommodate all its employees.
"We never encountered something like this before," Schneider said.
Usually, around 20 percent of the 15 lawyers at LKLSG operate remotely from home or another location. But now, all the firm's employees are working remotely.
"This has been something that we have been contemplating for the last week," Schneider said, "so we made sure to secure those extra licenses."
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2024 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllClimate Disputes, International Arbitration, and State Court Limitations for Global Issues
Judicial Face-Off: Navigating the Ethical and Efficient Use of AI in Legal Practice [CLE Pending]
4 minute readTrending Stories
- 1The Growing PFAS Morass: Why Insurance Should Cover These Products Liability Claims
- 2Dallas Jury Awards $98.65M in Botham Jean Killing by Dallas Officer
- 3In Talc Bankruptcy, Andy Birchfield Skipped His Deposition. Could He Face Sanctions?
- 4Pharmaceutical Patents: Benefits and Challenges
- 5Where Do Web-Tracking Class Actions Belong? 8th Circuit Weighs the Issue
Who Got The Work
Michael G. Bongiorno, Andrew Scott Dulberg and Elizabeth E. Driscoll from Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr have stepped in to represent Symbotic Inc., an A.I.-enabled technology platform that focuses on increasing supply chain efficiency, and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The case, filed Oct. 2 in Massachusetts District Court by the Brown Law Firm on behalf of Stephen Austen, accuses certain officers and directors of misleading investors in regard to Symbotic's potential for margin growth by failing to disclose that the company was not equipped to timely deploy its systems or manage expenses through project delays. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Nathaniel M. Gorton, is 1:24-cv-12522, Austen v. Cohen et al.
Who Got The Work
Edmund Polubinski and Marie Killmond of Davis Polk & Wardwell have entered appearances for data platform software development company MongoDB and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The action, filed Oct. 7 in New York Southern District Court by the Brown Law Firm, accuses the company's directors and/or officers of falsely expressing confidence in the company’s restructuring of its sales incentive plan and downplaying the severity of decreases in its upfront commitments. The case is 1:24-cv-07594, Roy v. Ittycheria et al.
Who Got The Work
Amy O. Bruchs and Kurt F. Ellison of Michael Best & Friedrich have entered appearances for Epic Systems Corp. in a pending employment discrimination lawsuit. The suit was filed Sept. 7 in Wisconsin Western District Court by Levine Eisberner LLC and Siri & Glimstad on behalf of a project manager who claims that he was wrongfully terminated after applying for a religious exemption to the defendant's COVID-19 vaccine mandate. The case, assigned to U.S. Magistrate Judge Anita Marie Boor, is 3:24-cv-00630, Secker, Nathan v. Epic Systems Corporation.
Who Got The Work
David X. Sullivan, Thomas J. Finn and Gregory A. Hall from McCarter & English have entered appearances for Sunrun Installation Services in a pending civil rights lawsuit. The complaint was filed Sept. 4 in Connecticut District Court by attorney Robert M. Berke on behalf of former employee George Edward Steins, who was arrested and charged with employing an unregistered home improvement salesperson. The complaint alleges that had Sunrun informed the Connecticut Department of Consumer Protection that the plaintiff's employment had ended in 2017 and that he no longer held Sunrun's home improvement contractor license, he would not have been hit with charges, which were dismissed in May 2024. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Jeffrey A. Meyer, is 3:24-cv-01423, Steins v. Sunrun, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Greenberg Traurig shareholder Joshua L. Raskin has entered an appearance for boohoo.com UK Ltd. in a pending patent infringement lawsuit. The suit, filed Sept. 3 in Texas Eastern District Court by Rozier Hardt McDonough on behalf of Alto Dynamics, asserts five patents related to an online shopping platform. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Rodney Gilstrap, is 2:24-cv-00719, Alto Dynamics, LLC v. boohoo.com UK Limited.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250