Accountability a Must to Lower Astounding Number of Construction Site Injuries, Deaths
In January, the Occupational Safety and Health Administration (OSHA) cited Florida Roofing Experts Inc., a Jacksonville roofing contractor, for failing to protect workers from falls. OSHA proposed over $1 million in penalties.
March 20, 2020 at 02:28 PM
5 minute read
In January, the Occupational Safety and Health Administration (OSHA) cited Florida Roofing Experts Inc., a Jacksonville roofing contractor, for failing to protect workers from falls. OSHA proposed over $1 million in penalties. According to OSHA, Florida Roofing Experts Inc. has an extensive history of violations demonstrating disregard for worker safety.
OSHA has promulgated fall protection standards and provides employers with numerous resources to help them comply with those safety standards. Fall protection and related training requirements routinely fall within the top 10 cited OSHA standards, according to the agency. Of the nearly 5,000 private industry worker fatalities each year, over 20% are in a construction setting and more than a third of construction-related deaths result from falls. According to OSHA, falls is the leading cause of private sector fatalities in the construction industry and is considered one of the "fatal four." OSHA proclaims that if the fatal four (which in addition to falls includes strikes with objects, electrocution and caught-in/between) were eliminated, many hundreds of lives would be saved in the United States every year.
OSHA standards exist for this reason—to prevent worker-related injuries and fatalities. Given the prevalence of fall-related incidents, the need and requirements for fall protection are clear and should be generally understood. Unfortunately, though, OSHA's citation against Florida Roofing Experts Inc. in January is not entirely surprising because far too many companies and contractors either fail to grasp the importance and meaning of the fall protection standards or otherwise simply ignore them, leading to the unfortunate number of injuries and deaths from falls every year.
Failing to Abide by Fall Protection Standards
January's citation however highlights another crucial issue—when companies and contractors fail to abide by fall protection standards, they not only put their employees in harms' way, they jeopardize the safety of everyone on site. Construction sites have numerous employees from various contractors all working among each other, exposing one another to each other's work. Contractors injure and kill workers employed by others by creating or ignoring dangerous conditions, including unprotected, inadequately protected or unmarked holes.
Regrettably, these wrongdoers are not always held accountable. OSHA investigations following incidents generally focus on the employer and contractors often attempt to protect each other and their respective subcontractors. This leads to contractors whose conduct harms the employees of others often being left unscathed, particularly after lawyers shy away from bringing cases when OSHA didn't cite the prospective defendant and total or partial workers compensation immunity presents enormous obstacles.
Last year, my office resolved a case involving a client who fell nearly twenty feet to the concrete below and suffered substantial orthopedic and head injuries. Given his condition at the time, the OSHA investigator never spoke to him. Instead, OSHA spoke only to the general contractor's project superintendent, who protected the general contractor and who later acknowledged telling a subcontractor who was sued following the incident that he had the subcontractor's back. OSHA cited the victim's employer and no one else. The victim had difficulty finding an attorney to help pursue his claims, given the OSHA report and workers compensation immunity.
Sadly, what the OSHA report missed was this … a subcontractor cut a hole in a roof nearly twenty feet off the ground and walked away leaving it unprotected and unmarked. The hole was later covered by an unmarked piece of plywood that was not secured. As a result, the subcontractor violated several fall protection standards and safety protocols, including its own internal standards, which in turn exposed the victim to an incredibly dangerous condition of which he was not aware. Through the lawsuit, the subcontractor was held accountable. However, because OSHA did not consider the subcontractor who cut the hole, and because of the hurdles of workers compensation immunity, the subcontractor nearly got away with its dangerous misconduct, which might have led to similar dangerous conduct in the future.
It remains critical that OSHA do the important work it does every day and cite companies like it did in January when it finds employees left unprotected, in violation of safety standards. OSHA though is inundated with work and budgetary issues (its investigators are even protected from deposition due to these issues), and therefore holding contractors responsible for safety violations also falls on the shoulders of lawyers willing to face the hurdles presented by these lawsuits. And, we must be willing to face and overcome these hurdles. There is otherwise no real hope that the staggering number of construction site injuries and deaths will go down in the years to come.
Michael Hersh is managing partner at Kelley | Uustal, a Fort Lauderdale law firm focusing on catastrophic injury and wrongful death. Contact Hersh at [email protected].
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2025 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllLeveraging the Power of Local Chambers of Commerce: A Second-Career Lawyer’s Guide to Building a Thriving Practice
5 minute readCFPB Proposes Rule to Regulate Data Brokers Selling Sensitive Information
5 minute readEssential Labor Shifts: Navigating Noncompetes, Workplace Politics and the AI Revolution
Trending Stories
- 1Cleary Nabs Public Company Advisory Practice Head From Orrick in San Francisco
- 2New York Environmental Legislation in 2024
- 3Cravath Hires Paul Weiss Antitrust Co-Chair
- 4Contract Technology Provider LegalOn Launches AI-powered Playbook Tool
- 5Court of Appeals Provides Comfort to Land Use Litigants Through the Relation Back Doctrine
Who Got The Work
J. Brugh Lower of Gibbons has entered an appearance for industrial equipment supplier Devco Corporation in a pending trademark infringement lawsuit. The suit, accusing the defendant of selling knock-off Graco products, was filed Dec. 18 in New Jersey District Court by Rivkin Radler on behalf of Graco Inc. and Graco Minnesota. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Zahid N. Quraishi, is 3:24-cv-11294, Graco Inc. et al v. Devco Corporation.
Who Got The Work
Rebecca Maller-Stein and Kent A. Yalowitz of Arnold & Porter Kaye Scholer have entered their appearances for Hanaco Venture Capital and its executives, Lior Prosor and David Frankel, in a pending securities lawsuit. The action, filed on Dec. 24 in New York Southern District Court by Zell, Aron & Co. on behalf of Goldeneye Advisors, accuses the defendants of negligently and fraudulently managing the plaintiff's $1 million investment. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Vernon S. Broderick, is 1:24-cv-09918, Goldeneye Advisors, LLC v. Hanaco Venture Capital, Ltd. et al.
Who Got The Work
Attorneys from A&O Shearman has stepped in as defense counsel for Toronto-Dominion Bank and other defendants in a pending securities class action. The suit, filed Dec. 11 in New York Southern District Court by Bleichmar Fonti & Auld, accuses the defendants of concealing the bank's 'pervasive' deficiencies in regards to its compliance with the Bank Secrecy Act and the quality of its anti-money laundering controls. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Arun Subramanian, is 1:24-cv-09445, Gonzalez v. The Toronto-Dominion Bank et al.
Who Got The Work
Crown Castle International, a Pennsylvania company providing shared communications infrastructure, has turned to Luke D. Wolf of Gordon Rees Scully Mansukhani to fend off a pending breach-of-contract lawsuit. The court action, filed Nov. 25 in Michigan Eastern District Court by Hooper Hathaway PC on behalf of The Town Residences LLC, accuses Crown Castle of failing to transfer approximately $30,000 in utility payments from T-Mobile in breach of a roof-top lease and assignment agreement. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Susan K. Declercq, is 2:24-cv-13131, The Town Residences LLC v. T-Mobile US, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Wilfred P. Coronato and Daniel M. Schwartz of McCarter & English have stepped in as defense counsel to Electrolux Home Products Inc. in a pending product liability lawsuit. The court action, filed Nov. 26 in New York Eastern District Court by Poulos Lopiccolo PC and Nagel Rice LLP on behalf of David Stern, alleges that the defendant's refrigerators’ drawers and shelving repeatedly break and fall apart within months after purchase. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Joan M. Azrack, is 2:24-cv-08204, Stern v. Electrolux Home Products, Inc.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250