Accountability a Must to Lower Astounding Number of Construction Site Injuries, Deaths
In January, the Occupational Safety and Health Administration (OSHA) cited Florida Roofing Experts Inc., a Jacksonville roofing contractor, for failing to protect workers from falls. OSHA proposed over $1 million in penalties.
March 20, 2020 at 02:28 PM
5 minute read
|
In January, the Occupational Safety and Health Administration (OSHA) cited Florida Roofing Experts Inc., a Jacksonville roofing contractor, for failing to protect workers from falls. OSHA proposed over $1 million in penalties. According to OSHA, Florida Roofing Experts Inc. has an extensive history of violations demonstrating disregard for worker safety.
OSHA has promulgated fall protection standards and provides employers with numerous resources to help them comply with those safety standards. Fall protection and related training requirements routinely fall within the top 10 cited OSHA standards, according to the agency. Of the nearly 5,000 private industry worker fatalities each year, over 20% are in a construction setting and more than a third of construction-related deaths result from falls. According to OSHA, falls is the leading cause of private sector fatalities in the construction industry and is considered one of the "fatal four." OSHA proclaims that if the fatal four (which in addition to falls includes strikes with objects, electrocution and caught-in/between) were eliminated, many hundreds of lives would be saved in the United States every year.
OSHA standards exist for this reason—to prevent worker-related injuries and fatalities. Given the prevalence of fall-related incidents, the need and requirements for fall protection are clear and should be generally understood. Unfortunately, though, OSHA's citation against Florida Roofing Experts Inc. in January is not entirely surprising because far too many companies and contractors either fail to grasp the importance and meaning of the fall protection standards or otherwise simply ignore them, leading to the unfortunate number of injuries and deaths from falls every year.
|Failing to Abide by Fall Protection Standards
January's citation however highlights another crucial issue—when companies and contractors fail to abide by fall protection standards, they not only put their employees in harms' way, they jeopardize the safety of everyone on site. Construction sites have numerous employees from various contractors all working among each other, exposing one another to each other's work. Contractors injure and kill workers employed by others by creating or ignoring dangerous conditions, including unprotected, inadequately protected or unmarked holes.
Regrettably, these wrongdoers are not always held accountable. OSHA investigations following incidents generally focus on the employer and contractors often attempt to protect each other and their respective subcontractors. This leads to contractors whose conduct harms the employees of others often being left unscathed, particularly after lawyers shy away from bringing cases when OSHA didn't cite the prospective defendant and total or partial workers compensation immunity presents enormous obstacles.
Last year, my office resolved a case involving a client who fell nearly twenty feet to the concrete below and suffered substantial orthopedic and head injuries. Given his condition at the time, the OSHA investigator never spoke to him. Instead, OSHA spoke only to the general contractor's project superintendent, who protected the general contractor and who later acknowledged telling a subcontractor who was sued following the incident that he had the subcontractor's back. OSHA cited the victim's employer and no one else. The victim had difficulty finding an attorney to help pursue his claims, given the OSHA report and workers compensation immunity.
Sadly, what the OSHA report missed was this … a subcontractor cut a hole in a roof nearly twenty feet off the ground and walked away leaving it unprotected and unmarked. The hole was later covered by an unmarked piece of plywood that was not secured. As a result, the subcontractor violated several fall protection standards and safety protocols, including its own internal standards, which in turn exposed the victim to an incredibly dangerous condition of which he was not aware. Through the lawsuit, the subcontractor was held accountable. However, because OSHA did not consider the subcontractor who cut the hole, and because of the hurdles of workers compensation immunity, the subcontractor nearly got away with its dangerous misconduct, which might have led to similar dangerous conduct in the future.
It remains critical that OSHA do the important work it does every day and cite companies like it did in January when it finds employees left unprotected, in violation of safety standards. OSHA though is inundated with work and budgetary issues (its investigators are even protected from deposition due to these issues), and therefore holding contractors responsible for safety violations also falls on the shoulders of lawyers willing to face the hurdles presented by these lawsuits. And, we must be willing to face and overcome these hurdles. There is otherwise no real hope that the staggering number of construction site injuries and deaths will go down in the years to come.
Michael Hersh is managing partner at Kelley | Uustal, a Fort Lauderdale law firm focusing on catastrophic injury and wrongful death. Contact Hersh at [email protected].
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2024 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllData Breaches, Increased Regulatory Risk and Florida’s New Digital Bill of Rights
7 minute readNavigating Florida's Products Liability Law: Defective Products, Warnings and the Pursuit of Justice
6 minute readNavigating Florida Property Insurance Claims in a Post-Fee-Shifting World
5 minute readTrending Stories
- 1Call for Nominations: Elite Trial Lawyers 2025
- 2Senate Judiciary Dems Release Report on Supreme Court Ethics
- 3Senate Confirms Last 2 of Biden's California Judicial Nominees
- 4Morrison & Foerster Doles Out Year-End and Special Bonuses, Raises Base Compensation for Associates
- 5Tom Girardi to Surrender to Federal Authorities on Jan. 7
Who Got The Work
Michael G. Bongiorno, Andrew Scott Dulberg and Elizabeth E. Driscoll from Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr have stepped in to represent Symbotic Inc., an A.I.-enabled technology platform that focuses on increasing supply chain efficiency, and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The case, filed Oct. 2 in Massachusetts District Court by the Brown Law Firm on behalf of Stephen Austen, accuses certain officers and directors of misleading investors in regard to Symbotic's potential for margin growth by failing to disclose that the company was not equipped to timely deploy its systems or manage expenses through project delays. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Nathaniel M. Gorton, is 1:24-cv-12522, Austen v. Cohen et al.
Who Got The Work
Edmund Polubinski and Marie Killmond of Davis Polk & Wardwell have entered appearances for data platform software development company MongoDB and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The action, filed Oct. 7 in New York Southern District Court by the Brown Law Firm, accuses the company's directors and/or officers of falsely expressing confidence in the company’s restructuring of its sales incentive plan and downplaying the severity of decreases in its upfront commitments. The case is 1:24-cv-07594, Roy v. Ittycheria et al.
Who Got The Work
Amy O. Bruchs and Kurt F. Ellison of Michael Best & Friedrich have entered appearances for Epic Systems Corp. in a pending employment discrimination lawsuit. The suit was filed Sept. 7 in Wisconsin Western District Court by Levine Eisberner LLC and Siri & Glimstad on behalf of a project manager who claims that he was wrongfully terminated after applying for a religious exemption to the defendant's COVID-19 vaccine mandate. The case, assigned to U.S. Magistrate Judge Anita Marie Boor, is 3:24-cv-00630, Secker, Nathan v. Epic Systems Corporation.
Who Got The Work
David X. Sullivan, Thomas J. Finn and Gregory A. Hall from McCarter & English have entered appearances for Sunrun Installation Services in a pending civil rights lawsuit. The complaint was filed Sept. 4 in Connecticut District Court by attorney Robert M. Berke on behalf of former employee George Edward Steins, who was arrested and charged with employing an unregistered home improvement salesperson. The complaint alleges that had Sunrun informed the Connecticut Department of Consumer Protection that the plaintiff's employment had ended in 2017 and that he no longer held Sunrun's home improvement contractor license, he would not have been hit with charges, which were dismissed in May 2024. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Jeffrey A. Meyer, is 3:24-cv-01423, Steins v. Sunrun, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Greenberg Traurig shareholder Joshua L. Raskin has entered an appearance for boohoo.com UK Ltd. in a pending patent infringement lawsuit. The suit, filed Sept. 3 in Texas Eastern District Court by Rozier Hardt McDonough on behalf of Alto Dynamics, asserts five patents related to an online shopping platform. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Rodney Gilstrap, is 2:24-cv-00719, Alto Dynamics, LLC v. boohoo.com UK Limited.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250