Florida Puts Hold on Attorney Discipline, Advertising Deadlines Due to COVID-19
Rules setting deadlines for attorney advertising, attorney discipline and the unauthorized practice of law have been suspended.
March 20, 2020 at 01:06 PM
3 minute read
Florida Supreme Court Chief Justice Charles Canady
The Florida Supreme Court eased some lawyer regulations Friday in response to the coronavirus.
The full court suspended deadlines for attorney discipline, attorney advertising and the unauthorized practice of law.
Florida has strict advertising rules requiring attorneys to submit their ads to the Florida Bar for review and evaluation. The order dropped all ad-related deadlines.
The latest order piles on top of others issued earlier to shrink court operations to essential services and live hearings in criminal and involuntary commitment cases where court orders require the presence of defendants and detainees.
Chief Justice Charles Canady initially suspended trials for two weeks but announced Thursday he would extend that to a total of five weeks ending April 17.
The Florida Bar delayed deadlines of its own after the executive committee met Friday on a conference call. Members who faced deadlines from February to May to report their three-year continuing legal education records now have until Aug. 31.
The committee also agreed to offer two new member benefits: Smith.ai, a virtual receptionist service oriented to small firms for live calls and web chat, and Indexed I/O, an e-discovery service. The bar also expects to introduce a mental health helpline July 1.
The proposed 2020-2021 budget was approved without a fee increase.
"In the midst of the COVID-19 coronavirus crisis, all of our lives, personally and professionally, have been impacted," bar president John Stewart wrote in a message to members. "We recognize the myriad of serious challenges this crisis creates for our members. We are here to assist in any way we can."
Meanwhile, Miami-Dade Circuit Court issued an advisory Friday suggesting pro se litigants should register with the Florida Courts e-filing portal to reduce in-person contacts. The online user manual and training videos also were offered.
Read the order:
Related stories:
New Federal, State Court Orders Issued for COVID-19 Operations in Florida
Cancel Everything Nonessential: Florida Supreme Court Outlines COVID-19 Plan
'Uncharted Waters Here': South Florida Law Firms Prep, Then Switch to Remote Work
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2024 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View All
Judge Slaps $16 Million Penalty on Defendants in Wyndham Timeshare Advertising Fraud Case
4 minute read
Gibson Dunn Recruits S&C Partner to Co-Lead M&A Practice, in 2-Partner Hire
Consumer Class Action Accuses Fabletics of Misleading Customers of 'VIP Membership Program' Value
Trending Stories
- 1A Meta DIG and Its Nvidia Implications
- 2Deception or Coercion? California Supreme Court Grants Review in Jailhouse Confession Case
- 3State Bar of Georgia Presents Access to Justice Pro Bono Awards
- 4Tips For Creating Holiday Plans That Everyone Can Be Grateful For
- 5Red Tape, Talent Wars & Pricey Office Space Greet Firms Entering Saudi Arabia
Who Got The Work
Michael G. Bongiorno, Andrew Scott Dulberg and Elizabeth E. Driscoll from Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr have stepped in to represent Symbotic Inc., an A.I.-enabled technology platform that focuses on increasing supply chain efficiency, and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The case, filed Oct. 2 in Massachusetts District Court by the Brown Law Firm on behalf of Stephen Austen, accuses certain officers and directors of misleading investors in regard to Symbotic's potential for margin growth by failing to disclose that the company was not equipped to timely deploy its systems or manage expenses through project delays. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Nathaniel M. Gorton, is 1:24-cv-12522, Austen v. Cohen et al.
Who Got The Work
Edmund Polubinski and Marie Killmond of Davis Polk & Wardwell have entered appearances for data platform software development company MongoDB and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The action, filed Oct. 7 in New York Southern District Court by the Brown Law Firm, accuses the company's directors and/or officers of falsely expressing confidence in the company’s restructuring of its sales incentive plan and downplaying the severity of decreases in its upfront commitments. The case is 1:24-cv-07594, Roy v. Ittycheria et al.
Who Got The Work
Amy O. Bruchs and Kurt F. Ellison of Michael Best & Friedrich have entered appearances for Epic Systems Corp. in a pending employment discrimination lawsuit. The suit was filed Sept. 7 in Wisconsin Western District Court by Levine Eisberner LLC and Siri & Glimstad on behalf of a project manager who claims that he was wrongfully terminated after applying for a religious exemption to the defendant's COVID-19 vaccine mandate. The case, assigned to U.S. Magistrate Judge Anita Marie Boor, is 3:24-cv-00630, Secker, Nathan v. Epic Systems Corporation.
Who Got The Work
David X. Sullivan, Thomas J. Finn and Gregory A. Hall from McCarter & English have entered appearances for Sunrun Installation Services in a pending civil rights lawsuit. The complaint was filed Sept. 4 in Connecticut District Court by attorney Robert M. Berke on behalf of former employee George Edward Steins, who was arrested and charged with employing an unregistered home improvement salesperson. The complaint alleges that had Sunrun informed the Connecticut Department of Consumer Protection that the plaintiff's employment had ended in 2017 and that he no longer held Sunrun's home improvement contractor license, he would not have been hit with charges, which were dismissed in May 2024. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Jeffrey A. Meyer, is 3:24-cv-01423, Steins v. Sunrun, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Greenberg Traurig shareholder Joshua L. Raskin has entered an appearance for boohoo.com UK Ltd. in a pending patent infringement lawsuit. The suit, filed Sept. 3 in Texas Eastern District Court by Rozier Hardt McDonough on behalf of Alto Dynamics, asserts five patents related to an online shopping platform. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Rodney Gilstrap, is 2:24-cv-00719, Alto Dynamics, LLC v. boohoo.com UK Limited.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250
