5 Ways Ethics Can Save—and Build—Your Practice Right Now
Right about now you're not as concerned about rules or deadlines. You're concerned about health and the future. And that's expected.
March 23, 2020 at 04:53 PM
6 minute read
Right about now you're not as concerned about rules or deadlines. You're concerned about health and the future. And that's expected.
But part of life is going on. Your cases are continuing—albeit on ice for a bit. You are still a lawyer, and you still have clients. Here's some ways to avoid additional heartache in your practice right now, and maybe find yourself busier than you thought you would be:
- Communicate.
The ethics rules require it. And now it's more important than ever. Call, email, text—or video chat all your clients. The first few minutes of any conversation or first paragraph of any email or text should have nothing to do with the matter at hand. It's time to discuss life, family, fears, and of course, health.
Also, reach out to former clients, friends and colleagues. I'm making it a point to contact at least one random person a day, just to check in on them. Have the same conversation. "How are you" takes on new meaning now. Maybe these people need some legal advice—or more than advice—and won't realize it until you ask "how's business," or "what's keeping you up at night?" It's a great time to give of yourself, and your work now may be gratis, but relationships always lead to something, and the people you help now likely won't forget you.
This is also a time to be honest and transparent. We're all going through this, no one is immune. Talk about your fears. We all have them.
- Use the down time to be diligent.
Yes, we're all "working from home," but that means different distractions, and more time to work on things you've been avoiding. It's a great time to practice a rule of ethics that is getting more attention from Bar regulators—the requirement of diligence.
Read that lengthy transcript, conduct that research you've been putting off, investigate that witness you've been meaning to look into, make sure your upcoming hearings (that are cancelled) would have been fully briefed—they will eventually take place.
And communicate this to the clients. They don't want to hear less from you right now, they want to hear more from you—and if I'm wrong, they'll let you know.
- Consider your talent.
I don't know how this is all going to play out, but it may be that a minor part of your practice becomes your full-time practice. Maybe you do mostly transactional real estate work and a little contract litigation. There's bound to be more of the latter in the next few months. Businesses needing to break leases, vendors not being paid, people being sued for just about everything.
Read up on the current rules and regulations, the local rule amendments, and current hot topics. Competence is required under the ethics rules and if you are going to find yourself doing something new or more of something you do on the side—or for the first time—you need to know how to do it with competence.
- Instead of Netflix, try some CLE videos.
There are tons of CLE videos online, and this is a great time to catch up on your required hours —and take in some new topics. That way you're not scrambling to meet your hours requirement on deadline, and you may learn something that can help you and a client going forward.
- Be nice. Be really, really nice.
Ethics and professionalism have merged. Lawyers are not only being disciplined for violations of ethics rules, but for nasty emails, and rude comments to opposing counsel and litigants. The Oath of Admission to The Florida Bar, where I am admitted, has been amended to include: "To opposing parties and their counsel, I pledge fairness, integrity, and civility, not only in court, but also in all written and oral communications." And lawyers have been disciplined for violating that portion of the oath.
You may disagree with the premise that lawyers can be disciplined for their lack of fairness and civility, but let's look at it from another perspective.
This isn't about being disciplined. This is about being human, recognizing what is going on and not pretending it isn't. It's not a time to advocate on behalf of your client by denying extensions and courtesies.
Everybody needs time.
That 20-day extension your normally agree to—make it 60 (without being asked for a specific time period) and let opposing counsel know they can reach out if that's not enough. That deposition that "had to occur," now that your case is delayed, reset it. You never agree to more than a 30-day extension for discovery responses? Double it, and leave the door open.
To many, I don't need to even say this, but I was reminded that some lawyers (and let's be honest— some judges) "don't get the memo" when we are in times of crisis when the Los Angeles County Bar Associations Professional Responsibility and Ethics Committee issued this statement:
"In light of the unprecedented risks associated with the novel Coronavirus, we urge all lawyers to liberally exercise every professional courtesy and/or discretional authority vested in them to avoid placing parties, counsel, witnesses, judges or court personnel under undue or avoidable stresses, or health risk.
Accordingly, we remind lawyers that the Guidelines for Civility in Litigation (LASC Local Rules, Appendix 3A require that lawyers grant reasonable requests for extensions and other accommodations.
Given the current circumstances, attorneys should be prepared to agree to reasonable extensions and continuances as may be necessary or advisable to avoid in-person meetings, hearings or deposition obligations. Consistent with California Rule of Professional Conduct 1.2(a), lawyers should also consult with their clients to seek authorization to extend such extensions or to stipulate to continuances in instances where the clients' authorization or consent may be required."
I'm always embarrassed when a state bar or voluntary bar association has to remind lawyers to be human beings, but we know that in these times, we see the best—and worst—of people.
Let me be clear—if you use this time to take advantage of the procedural rules—you will likely become famous. If you use this time to put people and health before anything else—you won't be famous—thankfully—and will be on the better side of karma.
Be well. I mean that.
Brian L. Tannebaum is special counsel and general counsel at Bast Amron in Miami, chairing its ethics, professional responsibility and white collar defense group.
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2025 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllDon’t Forget the Owner’s Manual: A Guide to Proving Liability Through Manufacturers’ Warnings and Instructions
5 minute readLeveraging the Power of Local Chambers of Commerce: A Second-Career Lawyer’s Guide to Building a Thriving Practice
5 minute readTrending Stories
- 1People in the News—Jan. 22, 2025—Knox McLaughlin, Saxton & Stump
- 2How I Made Office Managing Partner: 'Be Open to Opportunities, Ready to Seize Them When They Arise,' Says Lara Shortz of Michelman & Robinson
- 3The Intersection of Labor Law and Politics Following the Presidential Election
- 4Critical Mass With Law.com’s Amanda Bronstad: LA Judge Orders Edison to Preserve Wildfire Evidence, Is Kline & Specter Fight With Thomas Bosworth Finally Over?
- 5What Businesses Need to Know About Anticipated FTC Leadership Changes
Who Got The Work
J. Brugh Lower of Gibbons has entered an appearance for industrial equipment supplier Devco Corporation in a pending trademark infringement lawsuit. The suit, accusing the defendant of selling knock-off Graco products, was filed Dec. 18 in New Jersey District Court by Rivkin Radler on behalf of Graco Inc. and Graco Minnesota. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Zahid N. Quraishi, is 3:24-cv-11294, Graco Inc. et al v. Devco Corporation.
Who Got The Work
Rebecca Maller-Stein and Kent A. Yalowitz of Arnold & Porter Kaye Scholer have entered their appearances for Hanaco Venture Capital and its executives, Lior Prosor and David Frankel, in a pending securities lawsuit. The action, filed on Dec. 24 in New York Southern District Court by Zell, Aron & Co. on behalf of Goldeneye Advisors, accuses the defendants of negligently and fraudulently managing the plaintiff's $1 million investment. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Vernon S. Broderick, is 1:24-cv-09918, Goldeneye Advisors, LLC v. Hanaco Venture Capital, Ltd. et al.
Who Got The Work
Attorneys from A&O Shearman has stepped in as defense counsel for Toronto-Dominion Bank and other defendants in a pending securities class action. The suit, filed Dec. 11 in New York Southern District Court by Bleichmar Fonti & Auld, accuses the defendants of concealing the bank's 'pervasive' deficiencies in regards to its compliance with the Bank Secrecy Act and the quality of its anti-money laundering controls. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Arun Subramanian, is 1:24-cv-09445, Gonzalez v. The Toronto-Dominion Bank et al.
Who Got The Work
Crown Castle International, a Pennsylvania company providing shared communications infrastructure, has turned to Luke D. Wolf of Gordon Rees Scully Mansukhani to fend off a pending breach-of-contract lawsuit. The court action, filed Nov. 25 in Michigan Eastern District Court by Hooper Hathaway PC on behalf of The Town Residences LLC, accuses Crown Castle of failing to transfer approximately $30,000 in utility payments from T-Mobile in breach of a roof-top lease and assignment agreement. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Susan K. Declercq, is 2:24-cv-13131, The Town Residences LLC v. T-Mobile US, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Wilfred P. Coronato and Daniel M. Schwartz of McCarter & English have stepped in as defense counsel to Electrolux Home Products Inc. in a pending product liability lawsuit. The court action, filed Nov. 26 in New York Eastern District Court by Poulos Lopiccolo PC and Nagel Rice LLP on behalf of David Stern, alleges that the defendant's refrigerators’ drawers and shelving repeatedly break and fall apart within months after purchase. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Joan M. Azrack, is 2:24-cv-08204, Stern v. Electrolux Home Products, Inc.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250