South Florida Courts Scale Back More Operations Due to COVID-19
In federal courts, trials are off until April 27, and the Palm Beach clerk's office shrinks to essential operations.
March 23, 2020 at 04:14 PM
3 minute read
U.S. District Chief Judge K. Michael Moore
South Florida courts went deeper into retrenchment mode in response to the coronavirus as federal courts extended their trial delays and the Palm Beach clerk's office scaled back to essential services only.
U.S. District Chief Judge K. Michael Moore delayed trials for a second time Friday until at least April 27, and criminal case deadlines set between now and then were continued. Judges were told to use their discretion with trial-related deadlines in civil cases.
Detained defendants who don't wish to waive speedy and public trial rights are authorized to file motions with their trial judges, but Moore must be consulted before decisions are made.
Federal courts in South Florida remain open with a skeleton staff for essential services. Moore previously encouraged judges to allow remote appearances where permitted.
The Palm Beach clerk's office scaled back to essential operations starting Tuesday in response to Gov. Ron DeSantis' executive order Friday, which shut down the county's beaches and entertainment operations and trimmed restaurants and bars to takeout service and delivery through at least March 31.
Broward Circuit Court closed its courthouses March 16, which shuttered the clerk's offices since they operate in the courthouses.
Miami-Dade courts cut back to only emergency and constitutionally mandated proceedings March 17, and most clerks are working remotely.
Florida state courts are operating only essential services through April 17 under plans announced by Supreme Court Chief Justice Charles Canady.
The differences in timing and decisions about operations in South Florida were indirectly tied to COVID-19 cases, which have more than doubled in four days.
On Monday, Miami-Dade had 267 cases, up from 101 Thursday; Broward had 258 cases, up from 96; and Palm Beach had 89, up from 29.
Read the federal order:
Related stories:
Florida Puts Hold on Attorney Discipline, Advertising Deadlines Due to COVID-19
New Federal, State Court Orders Issued for COVID-19 Operations in Florida
David Lat Put on Ventilator, in Critical Condition With COVID-19 Infection
Risk Allocation for Economic Losses from Coronavirus Disease 2019
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2024 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View All
Divided State Court Reinstates Dispute Over Replacement Vehicles Fees
5 minute read
Second Circuit Ruling Expands VPPA Scope: What Organizations Need to Know
6 minute read
'They Got All Bent Out of Shape:' Parkland Lawyers Clash With Each Other
Courts of Appeal Conflicted Over Rule 1.442(c)(3) When Claims for Damages Involve a Husband and Wife
Trending Stories
Who Got The Work
Michael G. Bongiorno, Andrew Scott Dulberg and Elizabeth E. Driscoll from Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr have stepped in to represent Symbotic Inc., an A.I.-enabled technology platform that focuses on increasing supply chain efficiency, and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The case, filed Oct. 2 in Massachusetts District Court by the Brown Law Firm on behalf of Stephen Austen, accuses certain officers and directors of misleading investors in regard to Symbotic's potential for margin growth by failing to disclose that the company was not equipped to timely deploy its systems or manage expenses through project delays. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Nathaniel M. Gorton, is 1:24-cv-12522, Austen v. Cohen et al.
Who Got The Work
Edmund Polubinski and Marie Killmond of Davis Polk & Wardwell have entered appearances for data platform software development company MongoDB and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The action, filed Oct. 7 in New York Southern District Court by the Brown Law Firm, accuses the company's directors and/or officers of falsely expressing confidence in the company’s restructuring of its sales incentive plan and downplaying the severity of decreases in its upfront commitments. The case is 1:24-cv-07594, Roy v. Ittycheria et al.
Who Got The Work
Amy O. Bruchs and Kurt F. Ellison of Michael Best & Friedrich have entered appearances for Epic Systems Corp. in a pending employment discrimination lawsuit. The suit was filed Sept. 7 in Wisconsin Western District Court by Levine Eisberner LLC and Siri & Glimstad on behalf of a project manager who claims that he was wrongfully terminated after applying for a religious exemption to the defendant's COVID-19 vaccine mandate. The case, assigned to U.S. Magistrate Judge Anita Marie Boor, is 3:24-cv-00630, Secker, Nathan v. Epic Systems Corporation.
Who Got The Work
David X. Sullivan, Thomas J. Finn and Gregory A. Hall from McCarter & English have entered appearances for Sunrun Installation Services in a pending civil rights lawsuit. The complaint was filed Sept. 4 in Connecticut District Court by attorney Robert M. Berke on behalf of former employee George Edward Steins, who was arrested and charged with employing an unregistered home improvement salesperson. The complaint alleges that had Sunrun informed the Connecticut Department of Consumer Protection that the plaintiff's employment had ended in 2017 and that he no longer held Sunrun's home improvement contractor license, he would not have been hit with charges, which were dismissed in May 2024. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Jeffrey A. Meyer, is 3:24-cv-01423, Steins v. Sunrun, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Greenberg Traurig shareholder Joshua L. Raskin has entered an appearance for boohoo.com UK Ltd. in a pending patent infringement lawsuit. The suit, filed Sept. 3 in Texas Eastern District Court by Rozier Hardt McDonough on behalf of Alto Dynamics, asserts five patents related to an online shopping platform. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Rodney Gilstrap, is 2:24-cv-00719, Alto Dynamics, LLC v. boohoo.com UK Limited.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250
