French Quarter Landmark Offers Test of COVID-19 Business Interruption Coverage
Business owners are asking if they have insurance for shutting down due to the coronavirus. Attorney Joshua Whisler reports a New Orleans restaurant is setting up a test case.
March 24, 2020 at 02:19 PM
3 minute read
Many concerned business owners have been inquiring as to whether they have coverage for loss of business due to COVID-19, better known as the coronavirus.
If you ask your insurance broker, the answer one is most likely to receive is that there is no insurer that has an epidemic or pandemic endorsement.
While it may be true that your broker does not offer this coverage, there are in fact specialty carriers that in the past have offered similar endorsements to assist businesses for Ebola outbreaks and the effect it had on businesses that were forced to close.
There was news recently that the industry's Insurance Services Office developed new endorsement forms for specialty carriers to offer coverage for cornonavirus, but at this time I am not aware of any insurers actually offering this to clients.
Since at the time of publicatiotn the reader most likely would not have a specific endorsement for epidemic or coronavirus coverage, the next step is to determine whether the business interruption or loss of business portion of your policy will apply.
Business Interruption protects business owners against economic losses stemming from the closure of their operations due to a loss.
Losses in these contexts typically deal with fires, water losses or other events such as hurricanes, which force the businesses to close their operations as a result of being unable to function in their normal capacity.
Every policy has its own variations and definitions so it is not possible to provide a blanket statement, but generally speaking in the context of commercial policies the language dealing with business interruption typically reads as "direct physical loss or damage by a peril not otherwise excluded."
The million dollar question is whether COVID-19 can be interpreted as a "direct physical loss" to a business owners' property.
Additionally, most commercial policies have a civil authority provision. This coverage is triggered when the government forces a business or establishment to close down due to a physical event such as terrorism.
This coverage was contested in the courts post 9/11 when many businesses suffered loss of business due to the terrorist acts in New York City, at the Pentagon and the threat of others during that time.
A fair argument can be made that due to emergency declarations by local, state and federal officials combined with the coronavirus being interpreted as a direct physical loss, then one may have a claim for business interruption coverage under a commercial policy.
The first test case for gaining coverage benefits under this legal theory for the coronavirus pandemic is being challenged in Louisiana by a restaurant seeking a declaratory judgment against underwriters at Lloyd's of London. The case was brought by Oceana Grill, a well-known French Quarter eatery.
The lawsuit seeks a declaration from the court finding the emergency declaration from the state of Louisiana triggers the civil authority provision of the policy and the coronavirus would be considered a physical loss.
Many business owners and insurance professionals should closely follow this case and speak with their insurance professionals to determine whether they have a viable claim for the inevitable business interruption that will affect so many Americans.
Joshua A. Whisler is the founder of The Whisler Law Firm in Hollywood, Florida, which focuses on property damage and insurance claims, personal injury, workers' compensation and vaccine injury claims. Contact him at [email protected].
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2025 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllPlaintiffs Attorneys Awarded $113K on $1 Judgment in Noise Ordinance Dispute
4 minute readUS Judge Cannon Blocks DOJ From Releasing Final Report in Trump Documents Probe
3 minute readRead the Document: DOJ Releases Ex-Special Counsel's Report Explaining Trump Prosecutions
3 minute readTrending Stories
- 1Uber Files RICO Suit Against Plaintiff-Side Firms Alleging Fraudulent Injury Claims
- 2The Law Firm Disrupted: Scrutinizing the Elephant More Than the Mouse
- 3Inherent Diminished Value Damages Unavailable to 3rd-Party Claimants, Court Says
- 4Pa. Defense Firm Sued by Client Over Ex-Eagles Player's $43.5M Med Mal Win
- 5Losses Mount at Morris Manning, but Departing Ex-Chair Stays Bullish About His Old Firm's Future
Who Got The Work
J. Brugh Lower of Gibbons has entered an appearance for industrial equipment supplier Devco Corporation in a pending trademark infringement lawsuit. The suit, accusing the defendant of selling knock-off Graco products, was filed Dec. 18 in New Jersey District Court by Rivkin Radler on behalf of Graco Inc. and Graco Minnesota. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Zahid N. Quraishi, is 3:24-cv-11294, Graco Inc. et al v. Devco Corporation.
Who Got The Work
Rebecca Maller-Stein and Kent A. Yalowitz of Arnold & Porter Kaye Scholer have entered their appearances for Hanaco Venture Capital and its executives, Lior Prosor and David Frankel, in a pending securities lawsuit. The action, filed on Dec. 24 in New York Southern District Court by Zell, Aron & Co. on behalf of Goldeneye Advisors, accuses the defendants of negligently and fraudulently managing the plaintiff's $1 million investment. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Vernon S. Broderick, is 1:24-cv-09918, Goldeneye Advisors, LLC v. Hanaco Venture Capital, Ltd. et al.
Who Got The Work
Attorneys from A&O Shearman has stepped in as defense counsel for Toronto-Dominion Bank and other defendants in a pending securities class action. The suit, filed Dec. 11 in New York Southern District Court by Bleichmar Fonti & Auld, accuses the defendants of concealing the bank's 'pervasive' deficiencies in regards to its compliance with the Bank Secrecy Act and the quality of its anti-money laundering controls. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Arun Subramanian, is 1:24-cv-09445, Gonzalez v. The Toronto-Dominion Bank et al.
Who Got The Work
Crown Castle International, a Pennsylvania company providing shared communications infrastructure, has turned to Luke D. Wolf of Gordon Rees Scully Mansukhani to fend off a pending breach-of-contract lawsuit. The court action, filed Nov. 25 in Michigan Eastern District Court by Hooper Hathaway PC on behalf of The Town Residences LLC, accuses Crown Castle of failing to transfer approximately $30,000 in utility payments from T-Mobile in breach of a roof-top lease and assignment agreement. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Susan K. Declercq, is 2:24-cv-13131, The Town Residences LLC v. T-Mobile US, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Wilfred P. Coronato and Daniel M. Schwartz of McCarter & English have stepped in as defense counsel to Electrolux Home Products Inc. in a pending product liability lawsuit. The court action, filed Nov. 26 in New York Eastern District Court by Poulos Lopiccolo PC and Nagel Rice LLP on behalf of David Stern, alleges that the defendant's refrigerators’ drawers and shelving repeatedly break and fall apart within months after purchase. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Joan M. Azrack, is 2:24-cv-08204, Stern v. Electrolux Home Products, Inc.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250