French Quarter Landmark Offers Test of COVID-19 Business Interruption Coverage
Business owners are asking if they have insurance for shutting down due to the coronavirus. Attorney Joshua Whisler reports a New Orleans restaurant is setting up a test case.
March 24, 2020 at 02:19 PM
3 minute read
Many concerned business owners have been inquiring as to whether they have coverage for loss of business due to COVID-19, better known as the coronavirus.
If you ask your insurance broker, the answer one is most likely to receive is that there is no insurer that has an epidemic or pandemic endorsement.
While it may be true that your broker does not offer this coverage, there are in fact specialty carriers that in the past have offered similar endorsements to assist businesses for Ebola outbreaks and the effect it had on businesses that were forced to close.
There was news recently that the industry's Insurance Services Office developed new endorsement forms for specialty carriers to offer coverage for cornonavirus, but at this time I am not aware of any insurers actually offering this to clients.
Since at the time of publicatiotn the reader most likely would not have a specific endorsement for epidemic or coronavirus coverage, the next step is to determine whether the business interruption or loss of business portion of your policy will apply.
Business Interruption protects business owners against economic losses stemming from the closure of their operations due to a loss.
Losses in these contexts typically deal with fires, water losses or other events such as hurricanes, which force the businesses to close their operations as a result of being unable to function in their normal capacity.
Every policy has its own variations and definitions so it is not possible to provide a blanket statement, but generally speaking in the context of commercial policies the language dealing with business interruption typically reads as "direct physical loss or damage by a peril not otherwise excluded."
The million dollar question is whether COVID-19 can be interpreted as a "direct physical loss" to a business owners' property.
Additionally, most commercial policies have a civil authority provision. This coverage is triggered when the government forces a business or establishment to close down due to a physical event such as terrorism.
This coverage was contested in the courts post 9/11 when many businesses suffered loss of business due to the terrorist acts in New York City, at the Pentagon and the threat of others during that time.
A fair argument can be made that due to emergency declarations by local, state and federal officials combined with the coronavirus being interpreted as a direct physical loss, then one may have a claim for business interruption coverage under a commercial policy.
The first test case for gaining coverage benefits under this legal theory for the coronavirus pandemic is being challenged in Louisiana by a restaurant seeking a declaratory judgment against underwriters at Lloyd's of London. The case was brought by Oceana Grill, a well-known French Quarter eatery.
The lawsuit seeks a declaration from the court finding the emergency declaration from the state of Louisiana triggers the civil authority provision of the policy and the coronavirus would be considered a physical loss.
Many business owners and insurance professionals should closely follow this case and speak with their insurance professionals to determine whether they have a viable claim for the inevitable business interruption that will affect so many Americans.
Joshua A. Whisler is the founder of The Whisler Law Firm in Hollywood, Florida, which focuses on property damage and insurance claims, personal injury, workers' compensation and vaccine injury claims. Contact him at [email protected].
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2024 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllDivided State Court Reinstates Dispute Over Replacement Vehicles Fees
5 minute readSecond Circuit Ruling Expands VPPA Scope: What Organizations Need to Know
6 minute read'They Got All Bent Out of Shape:' Parkland Lawyers Clash With Each Other
Courts of Appeal Conflicted Over Rule 1.442(c)(3) When Claims for Damages Involve a Husband and Wife
Trending Stories
Who Got The Work
Michael G. Bongiorno, Andrew Scott Dulberg and Elizabeth E. Driscoll from Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr have stepped in to represent Symbotic Inc., an A.I.-enabled technology platform that focuses on increasing supply chain efficiency, and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The case, filed Oct. 2 in Massachusetts District Court by the Brown Law Firm on behalf of Stephen Austen, accuses certain officers and directors of misleading investors in regard to Symbotic's potential for margin growth by failing to disclose that the company was not equipped to timely deploy its systems or manage expenses through project delays. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Nathaniel M. Gorton, is 1:24-cv-12522, Austen v. Cohen et al.
Who Got The Work
Edmund Polubinski and Marie Killmond of Davis Polk & Wardwell have entered appearances for data platform software development company MongoDB and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The action, filed Oct. 7 in New York Southern District Court by the Brown Law Firm, accuses the company's directors and/or officers of falsely expressing confidence in the company’s restructuring of its sales incentive plan and downplaying the severity of decreases in its upfront commitments. The case is 1:24-cv-07594, Roy v. Ittycheria et al.
Who Got The Work
Amy O. Bruchs and Kurt F. Ellison of Michael Best & Friedrich have entered appearances for Epic Systems Corp. in a pending employment discrimination lawsuit. The suit was filed Sept. 7 in Wisconsin Western District Court by Levine Eisberner LLC and Siri & Glimstad on behalf of a project manager who claims that he was wrongfully terminated after applying for a religious exemption to the defendant's COVID-19 vaccine mandate. The case, assigned to U.S. Magistrate Judge Anita Marie Boor, is 3:24-cv-00630, Secker, Nathan v. Epic Systems Corporation.
Who Got The Work
David X. Sullivan, Thomas J. Finn and Gregory A. Hall from McCarter & English have entered appearances for Sunrun Installation Services in a pending civil rights lawsuit. The complaint was filed Sept. 4 in Connecticut District Court by attorney Robert M. Berke on behalf of former employee George Edward Steins, who was arrested and charged with employing an unregistered home improvement salesperson. The complaint alleges that had Sunrun informed the Connecticut Department of Consumer Protection that the plaintiff's employment had ended in 2017 and that he no longer held Sunrun's home improvement contractor license, he would not have been hit with charges, which were dismissed in May 2024. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Jeffrey A. Meyer, is 3:24-cv-01423, Steins v. Sunrun, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Greenberg Traurig shareholder Joshua L. Raskin has entered an appearance for boohoo.com UK Ltd. in a pending patent infringement lawsuit. The suit, filed Sept. 3 in Texas Eastern District Court by Rozier Hardt McDonough on behalf of Alto Dynamics, asserts five patents related to an online shopping platform. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Rodney Gilstrap, is 2:24-cv-00719, Alto Dynamics, LLC v. boohoo.com UK Limited.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250