Get Used to Online Litigation: It Could Become Florida's New Normal
"Let's face it, judges have been reluctant even to use telephone conferences in lieu of live appearances," said Miami-Dade Circuit Judge Jennifer Bailey. "We're all going to become much more comfortable with the idea of remote appearances."
March 25, 2020 at 03:45 PM
6 minute read
It took a global crisis, but Florida litigators and jurists are embracing technology in ways they never have, conducting oral arguments and other court proceedings online—and many of these COVID-19-induced adjustments could be permanent.
There's no reason why hearings can't continue remotely once life gets back to normal, according to Broward Circuit Chief Judge Jack Tuter, who said he's received "rave reviews" from judges after securing 100 new video conferencing licenses with emergency funding from the Florida Supreme Court.
"Using such technical advances reduces costs, travel, the stress of all that is involved in getting to a courtroom," said Tuter, who also thanked staff and lawyers for their understanding and cooperation. "The end result of all of this may have a positive impact on how court hearings are conducted well into the future."
While the Florida Supreme Court has been live-streaming its arguments since 1997, it's considering looping in video conferencing technologies so that lawyers can make oral arguments remotely in May.
'Virtual courthouse'
Miami-Dade Circuit Judge Jennifer Bailey is leading an impromptu pandemic work group for the court's digital division—covering most non-criminal cases—which she said could be "a real game changer."
"The consequence of all this is going to be that technological innovations that have been called for, for the past several years are going to become much more widely available," Bailey said. "Let's face it, judges have been reluctant even to use telephone conferences in lieu of live appearances. We're all going to become much more comfortable with the idea of remote appearances."
The court has bought new webcams and video conferencing licenses, and is addressing bandwidth issues and training staff who aren't tech savvy.
"We're designing and building a virtual courthouse, and we hope to do the whole thing in 10 days, so it's a challenge," Bailey said. "I know folks out there are impatient for specific solutions, but while we're trying to negotiate licenses and trying to finance it, we don't want to make promises that we can't keep until we have our solutions locked down."
Bailey said that time is necessary to ensure procedural fairness and avoid digital mishaps, which have happened. One judge at the U.S. Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit missed about six minutes of oral arguments when a spotty internet connection dropped him from a phone conference.
Related story: 'It's Kind of a Mess': Phone Arguments Get Rocky Debut at DC Circuit
But Miami attorney Aliette H. Carolan of the Carolan Family Law said she isn't worried about connectivity issues.
"If you're in a hearing and connection is lost, I think you just call the person back or try to reconnect," Carolan said.
The biggest obstacle, she says, will be maintaining the rules of evidence and procedure and the sanctity of the record from afar. The Florida Supreme Court has solved one of those problems for now, with an administrative order allowing witnesses to be sworn in remotely.
Carolan said the shift is "fantastic" news for many small and midsize firms, who could save time and money litigating remotely. She also runs Cut the Conflict, a platform aimed at getting divorces done online.
"We've been hoping for this for years," Carolan said. "I don't have to travel and sit in a court lobby because the hearing before mine ran late and now I'm sitting there for two hours. That's going to save my clients money right away."
Carolan's advice for older or less tech-savvy attorneys: "It's always a good idea to have some millennials on your staff who will walk you through the process."
Working remotely should be a positive, not a negative, according to Podhurst Orseck's Peter Prieto, who said state and federal judges "will be some of the unsung heroes of the coronavirus crisis."
Online trials?
For Miami lawyer Judd Rosen of Goldberg & Rosen, said the recent outbreak has made it easier to check in with clients, and to handle administrative tasks and website maintenance.
"Now is the time to settle," according to Rosen, who said he's helped resolve three cases through Skype mediations, and would even like to see mini trials and arbitrations piloted online.
"Imagine if all the jurors could do jury duty from home? How cool would that be?" Rosen said. "I'm not against it."
That said, some aspects of litigation have to be physically seen, felt and heard. When the defendant in one recent trial questioned whether Rosen's client, the plaintiff, was really a hard worker, for example, Rosen showed the jury his client's hands.
"We let the jury feel his hands so they could see that he had calluses on his hands," Rosen said. "You're not going to be able to do that online."
Coral Gables litigator Danielle Cohen of Cohen Law said she hopes remote litigation will supplement and improve existing procedures in future, but not totally replace them.
"We, as trial lawyers, have a difficult enough time keeping the attention of a juror when they're standing 20 feet away from us," Cohen said. "I can only imagine how difficult it would be to keep attention when they're in front of a laptop instead of in person."
It's been "an adjustment, to say the least" for Cohen, who's working from home with two small children, but it's helped that her firm was already paperless and using remote servers.
"If you're a law firm that was still using paper files and didn't have the entire office on an electronic platform, whether you're 100 attorneys or one attorney, transitioning to a remote environment is going to be far more difficult, if not impossible," Cohen said.
For attorneys and judges looking to adapt to using video platforms, the American Board of Trial Advocates' South Florida chapters are offering free webinars.
Read more:
Tired of Netflix? Listen to Live Arguments From the 11th Circuit
Accident Attorneys Warn of Coronavirus Panic in South Florida
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2025 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllUS Judge Cannon Blocks DOJ From Releasing Final Report in Trump Documents Probe
3 minute readRead the Document: DOJ Releases Ex-Special Counsel's Report Explaining Trump Prosecutions
3 minute readUS Judge OKs Partial Release of Ex-Special Counsel's Final Report in Election Case
3 minute readTrending Stories
- 1US DOJ Threatens to Prosecute Local Officials Who Don't Aid Immigration Enforcement
- 2Kirkland Is Entering a New Market. Will Its Rates Get a Warm Welcome?
- 3African Law Firm Investigated Over ‘AI-Generated’ Case References
- 4Gen AI and Associate Legal Writing: Davis Wright Tremaine's New Training Model
- 5Departing Attorneys Sue Their Former Law Firm
Who Got The Work
J. Brugh Lower of Gibbons has entered an appearance for industrial equipment supplier Devco Corporation in a pending trademark infringement lawsuit. The suit, accusing the defendant of selling knock-off Graco products, was filed Dec. 18 in New Jersey District Court by Rivkin Radler on behalf of Graco Inc. and Graco Minnesota. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Zahid N. Quraishi, is 3:24-cv-11294, Graco Inc. et al v. Devco Corporation.
Who Got The Work
Rebecca Maller-Stein and Kent A. Yalowitz of Arnold & Porter Kaye Scholer have entered their appearances for Hanaco Venture Capital and its executives, Lior Prosor and David Frankel, in a pending securities lawsuit. The action, filed on Dec. 24 in New York Southern District Court by Zell, Aron & Co. on behalf of Goldeneye Advisors, accuses the defendants of negligently and fraudulently managing the plaintiff's $1 million investment. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Vernon S. Broderick, is 1:24-cv-09918, Goldeneye Advisors, LLC v. Hanaco Venture Capital, Ltd. et al.
Who Got The Work
Attorneys from A&O Shearman has stepped in as defense counsel for Toronto-Dominion Bank and other defendants in a pending securities class action. The suit, filed Dec. 11 in New York Southern District Court by Bleichmar Fonti & Auld, accuses the defendants of concealing the bank's 'pervasive' deficiencies in regards to its compliance with the Bank Secrecy Act and the quality of its anti-money laundering controls. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Arun Subramanian, is 1:24-cv-09445, Gonzalez v. The Toronto-Dominion Bank et al.
Who Got The Work
Crown Castle International, a Pennsylvania company providing shared communications infrastructure, has turned to Luke D. Wolf of Gordon Rees Scully Mansukhani to fend off a pending breach-of-contract lawsuit. The court action, filed Nov. 25 in Michigan Eastern District Court by Hooper Hathaway PC on behalf of The Town Residences LLC, accuses Crown Castle of failing to transfer approximately $30,000 in utility payments from T-Mobile in breach of a roof-top lease and assignment agreement. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Susan K. Declercq, is 2:24-cv-13131, The Town Residences LLC v. T-Mobile US, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Wilfred P. Coronato and Daniel M. Schwartz of McCarter & English have stepped in as defense counsel to Electrolux Home Products Inc. in a pending product liability lawsuit. The court action, filed Nov. 26 in New York Eastern District Court by Poulos Lopiccolo PC and Nagel Rice LLP on behalf of David Stern, alleges that the defendant's refrigerators’ drawers and shelving repeatedly break and fall apart within months after purchase. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Joan M. Azrack, is 2:24-cv-08204, Stern v. Electrolux Home Products, Inc.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250