Not a Proper Emergency: Cruise Line's Motion Angers Judge Amid Coronavirus Pandemic
"Would the world end if the corporate deposition did not happen next week? Obviously not," U.S. Magistrate Judge Jonathan Goodman told attorneys in a deposition dispute amid the COVID-19 pandemic.
March 27, 2020 at 04:28 PM
4 minute read
U.S. Magistrate Judge Jonathan Goodman gave one corporate defendant in the Southern District of Florida a piece of his mind in shutting down their request for an emergency motion for a protective order, after discovering that there wasn't actually an emergency—especially when put into context of a global pandemic.
"I feel compelled to offer some observations in the 'let's-keep-things-in-perspective' department," Goodman's order said. "If all the issues we are currently facing were to be organized on a ladder of importance, this deposition-scheduling dispute would not even reach the bottom rung of a 10-rung ladder."
Defendant NCL (Bahamas) Ltd.—commonly known as Norwegian Cruise Lines—sought a protective order that would stop a corporate representative from being deposed Wednesday, over a lawsuit from an anonymous passenger who alleges she was assaulted on one of its ships. The emergency motion claimed opposing counsel has ignored attempts to reschedule.
But Goodman called that issue "comparatively unimportant," reminding both sides that "the entire world is in the midst of a pandemic" and that "life will go on" without the deposition.
"Thousands of people worldwide have contracted the coronavirus and there have been hundreds of virus-caused deaths in the United States," Goodman wrote. "Millions of Americans have been ordered to remain in their homes. Millions more have lost their jobs in the past two weeks. The stock market has taken a brutal beating in the last two to three weeks. Many people are scared. Others are panicked. Everyone is unsure about the future. Cruises have been canceled and all the major airlines have severely curtailed their flights."
Goodman said he was shocked the attorneys couldn't resolve the issue themselves. He also remarked that it wouldn't be rational to expect them to comply with social distancing orders while taking witness depositions, or to properly prepare the representative when the cruise ship industry is at a standstill and thousands of staff have been fired.
"Nevertheless, the lawyers in this case have been exchanging snippy emails over the past two weeks over the scheduling of a corporate representative deposition," the order said. "Moreover, defense counsel certified that this routine discovery dust-up is so important that it merits 'emergency' status. No, it doesn't."
What's more, U.S. District Judge Cecilia Altonaga had already canceled the deposition but denied NCL's emergency motion, finding it didn't comply with a discovery procedures order.
"Would the world end if the corporate deposition did not occur next week? Obviously not," the order said.
Plaintiffs attorney Philip Gerson of Gerson & Schwartz in Miami called the issue "a tempest in a teapot" and said he's sought the deposition since January.
"We cannot comment on the ruling of a judge. However, I can state that for many years we have maintained cordial professional relations with the cruise ship companies and their capable lawyers," Gerson said. "Case management orders limit our discovery time window, so we must be aggressive in getting the evidence we need in discovery. Thus it is not uncommon to seek magistrate supervision to manage discovery schedules."
Gerson said his team canceled the deposition and has asked NCL for alternative dates. He's handling the case with David Markel, Edward Schwartz, Raul Delgado II and Nicholas Gerson.
Defense attorneys Darren Friedman, Jeffrey Foreman and Avi Shoham of Foreman Friedman in Miami declined to comment.
They followed up with a motion to dismiss the plaintiffs fraudulent concealment count Friday for failure to state a claim.
When the deposition does finally go ahead, Goodman's order said the attorneys will be expected to "explain their behavior in context of the far-more-important issues this court (and the entire world) is facing."
Read the order:
Read more:
COVID-19 Couldn't Stop This Case: Inside South Florida's Last Federal Jury Trial
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2025 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllMiami Judge Approves Shaq's $11 Million Settlement to Resolve Astrals Investor Claims
3 minute readA Voyeur Videotaped Them Undressing. Should Cruise Ship Passengers Have to Arbitrate?
3 minute readRead the Document: DOJ Releases Ex-Special Counsel's Report Explaining Trump Prosecutions
3 minute readSupreme Court Wrestles With Disabled Ex-Firefighter's Discrimination Case
Trending Stories
Who Got The Work
J. Brugh Lower of Gibbons has entered an appearance for industrial equipment supplier Devco Corporation in a pending trademark infringement lawsuit. The suit, accusing the defendant of selling knock-off Graco products, was filed Dec. 18 in New Jersey District Court by Rivkin Radler on behalf of Graco Inc. and Graco Minnesota. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Zahid N. Quraishi, is 3:24-cv-11294, Graco Inc. et al v. Devco Corporation.
Who Got The Work
Rebecca Maller-Stein and Kent A. Yalowitz of Arnold & Porter Kaye Scholer have entered their appearances for Hanaco Venture Capital and its executives, Lior Prosor and David Frankel, in a pending securities lawsuit. The action, filed on Dec. 24 in New York Southern District Court by Zell, Aron & Co. on behalf of Goldeneye Advisors, accuses the defendants of negligently and fraudulently managing the plaintiff's $1 million investment. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Vernon S. Broderick, is 1:24-cv-09918, Goldeneye Advisors, LLC v. Hanaco Venture Capital, Ltd. et al.
Who Got The Work
Attorneys from A&O Shearman has stepped in as defense counsel for Toronto-Dominion Bank and other defendants in a pending securities class action. The suit, filed Dec. 11 in New York Southern District Court by Bleichmar Fonti & Auld, accuses the defendants of concealing the bank's 'pervasive' deficiencies in regards to its compliance with the Bank Secrecy Act and the quality of its anti-money laundering controls. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Arun Subramanian, is 1:24-cv-09445, Gonzalez v. The Toronto-Dominion Bank et al.
Who Got The Work
Crown Castle International, a Pennsylvania company providing shared communications infrastructure, has turned to Luke D. Wolf of Gordon Rees Scully Mansukhani to fend off a pending breach-of-contract lawsuit. The court action, filed Nov. 25 in Michigan Eastern District Court by Hooper Hathaway PC on behalf of The Town Residences LLC, accuses Crown Castle of failing to transfer approximately $30,000 in utility payments from T-Mobile in breach of a roof-top lease and assignment agreement. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Susan K. Declercq, is 2:24-cv-13131, The Town Residences LLC v. T-Mobile US, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Wilfred P. Coronato and Daniel M. Schwartz of McCarter & English have stepped in as defense counsel to Electrolux Home Products Inc. in a pending product liability lawsuit. The court action, filed Nov. 26 in New York Eastern District Court by Poulos Lopiccolo PC and Nagel Rice LLP on behalf of David Stern, alleges that the defendant's refrigerators’ drawers and shelving repeatedly break and fall apart within months after purchase. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Joan M. Azrack, is 2:24-cv-08204, Stern v. Electrolux Home Products, Inc.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250