South Florida Federal Criminal Cases Shift to Remote Operations
U.S. District Chief Judge K. Michael Moore issues an order to restrict in-person appearances in criminal proceedings from initial appearances to sentencing. Trials were suspended earlier.
March 29, 2020 at 01:02 PM
4 minute read
Reassessing the viral spread of COVID-19, South Florida federal courts took the unprecedented step of waiving in-person appearances by criminal defendants with their consent.
The sweeping order issued Saturday by U.S. District Chief Judge K. Michael Moore in Miami covered the criminal pipeline from initial appearances to sentencing, offering video or phone appearances as an option.
Until now, the hearings where defendants would normally be present to meet constitutional requirements where being conducted, but civil and criminal trials had been suspended.
Moore decided the order would last 90 days with room for an extension. A previous order suspending trials lasts only until April 27. Grand jury proceedings were an exception to court cutbacks until Thursday when Moore also put off grand jury operations until April 27.
Miami criminal defense attorney Joel Hirschhorn, who wrapped up the last criminal trial Tuesday before virus-related restrictions took effect in the Southern District of Florida, called the order " smart, well-written and intended."
Defense attorney and former federal prosecutor David Weinstein of Hinshaw & Culbertson in Coral Gables said, "Overall, this shows the continued progressive nature of the federal courts and Chief Judge Moore to embrace technology to prevent the district courts from coming to a complete standstill."
Weinstein noted trials were excluded from the order "as the constitutional issues in those proceedings are voluminous and most likely difficult to resolve." Removal hearings, the federal equivalent of extradition, is "one area that will present difficulty" because they often involve witnesses from outside the area.
Miami criminal defense attorney Dennis Kainen of Weisberg Kainen Mark, a former president of the Federal Bar Association's South Florida chapter, said, "Undoubtedly, there are due process compromises with this order but with the unprecedented reality, I think it is well-crafted." He suggested revisiting pretrial detention orders, saying, "The court should consider that the threat of the virus is more pronounced in close quarters such as the Federal Detention Center."
Moore said he was acting based on the findings of the U.S. Judicial Conference under the CARES Act, the wide-ranging relief package signed Friday by President Donald Trump. As of Sunday, the conference's website on the coronavirus pandemic was last updated Thursday to note criminal trials were suspended in Seattle.
South Florida federal courts pulled back to remote operations and in-person appearances only for essential hearings under Moore's first pandemic order March 18.
Starting Monday, U.S. bankruptcy courts in South Florida are closed to in-person visits indefinitely.
State courts acted earlier to scale back operations, but the restrictions are set to expire April 17.
In Miami-Dade, courts have issued alerts about four people infected with the virus who worked in courthouses.
On Friday, an alert was issued for people who may have been exposed to a sick worker in Hialeah Courthouse Rooms 202 and 203 on March 9, the North Dade Justice Center Rooms 215 and 216 on March 16 and the Coral Gables Courthouse Rooms 105 and 108 on March 17.
Previous advisories covered the coronavirus contracted by two jail guards who worked in Courtrooms 2-7, 3-2 and 7-2 from March 16-19 and another court employee who worked in Circuit Judge William Altfield's Courtroom 6-2 at the Richard E. Gerstein Justice Building on March 10 and 11.
Visitors were advised to watch for the development of a fever, cough or difficulty breathing for two weeks.
Miami-Dade courts cut back to only emergency and constitutionally mandated proceedings March 17, and most clerks are working remotely.
Broward Circuit Court closed its courthouses March 16, which shuttered the clerk's offices since they operate in the courthouses.
Palm Beach Circuit Court is open only for essential operations.
As of Monday morning, Florida had 5,473 coronavirus cases including 1,608 in Miami-Dade County, 1,129 in Broward County and 407 in Palm Beach County. A total of 63 people died.
The U.S. death toll passed 2,000 over the weekend, but Dr. Anthony Fauci, director of the National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases, told CNN on Sunday that deaths could rise to 100,000 to 200,000.
Read the order:
Related stories:
South Florida Bankruptcy Courts, State Courts Expand COVID-19 Suspensions
Get Used to Online Litigation: It Could Become Florida's New Normal
South Florida Courts Scale Back More Operations Due to COVID-19
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2024 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllDivided State Court Reinstates Dispute Over Replacement Vehicles Fees
5 minute readSecond Circuit Ruling Expands VPPA Scope: What Organizations Need to Know
6 minute read'They Got All Bent Out of Shape:' Parkland Lawyers Clash With Each Other
Courts of Appeal Conflicted Over Rule 1.442(c)(3) When Claims for Damages Involve a Husband and Wife
Law Firms Mentioned
Trending Stories
Who Got The Work
Michael G. Bongiorno, Andrew Scott Dulberg and Elizabeth E. Driscoll from Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr have stepped in to represent Symbotic Inc., an A.I.-enabled technology platform that focuses on increasing supply chain efficiency, and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The case, filed Oct. 2 in Massachusetts District Court by the Brown Law Firm on behalf of Stephen Austen, accuses certain officers and directors of misleading investors in regard to Symbotic's potential for margin growth by failing to disclose that the company was not equipped to timely deploy its systems or manage expenses through project delays. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Nathaniel M. Gorton, is 1:24-cv-12522, Austen v. Cohen et al.
Who Got The Work
Edmund Polubinski and Marie Killmond of Davis Polk & Wardwell have entered appearances for data platform software development company MongoDB and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The action, filed Oct. 7 in New York Southern District Court by the Brown Law Firm, accuses the company's directors and/or officers of falsely expressing confidence in the company’s restructuring of its sales incentive plan and downplaying the severity of decreases in its upfront commitments. The case is 1:24-cv-07594, Roy v. Ittycheria et al.
Who Got The Work
Amy O. Bruchs and Kurt F. Ellison of Michael Best & Friedrich have entered appearances for Epic Systems Corp. in a pending employment discrimination lawsuit. The suit was filed Sept. 7 in Wisconsin Western District Court by Levine Eisberner LLC and Siri & Glimstad on behalf of a project manager who claims that he was wrongfully terminated after applying for a religious exemption to the defendant's COVID-19 vaccine mandate. The case, assigned to U.S. Magistrate Judge Anita Marie Boor, is 3:24-cv-00630, Secker, Nathan v. Epic Systems Corporation.
Who Got The Work
David X. Sullivan, Thomas J. Finn and Gregory A. Hall from McCarter & English have entered appearances for Sunrun Installation Services in a pending civil rights lawsuit. The complaint was filed Sept. 4 in Connecticut District Court by attorney Robert M. Berke on behalf of former employee George Edward Steins, who was arrested and charged with employing an unregistered home improvement salesperson. The complaint alleges that had Sunrun informed the Connecticut Department of Consumer Protection that the plaintiff's employment had ended in 2017 and that he no longer held Sunrun's home improvement contractor license, he would not have been hit with charges, which were dismissed in May 2024. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Jeffrey A. Meyer, is 3:24-cv-01423, Steins v. Sunrun, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Greenberg Traurig shareholder Joshua L. Raskin has entered an appearance for boohoo.com UK Ltd. in a pending patent infringement lawsuit. The suit, filed Sept. 3 in Texas Eastern District Court by Rozier Hardt McDonough on behalf of Alto Dynamics, asserts five patents related to an online shopping platform. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Rodney Gilstrap, is 2:24-cv-00719, Alto Dynamics, LLC v. boohoo.com UK Limited.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250