Federal Judge Appears Skeptical of Ex-Broward Sheriff's Arguments
The Florida Senate formally removed former Broward County Sheriff Scott Israel from office during an October special session, prompting Israel to file a federal lawsuit alleging the Senate process was unfair.
March 30, 2020 at 01:36 PM
6 minute read
A federal judge appeared unconvinced that state proceedings resulting in the ouster of former Broward County Sheriff Scott Israel violated the veteran law enforcement officer's due-process rights.
Gov. Ron DeSantis made the suspension of Israel one of his first acts after taking office last year. He accused Israel of "incompetence" and "neglect of duty" for the handling of the 2018 massacre at Marjory Stoneman Douglas High School that killed 17 students and faculty members and a 2017 mass shooting at the Fort Lauderdale-Hollywood International Airport that killed five people.
The Senate formally removed Israel from office during an October special session, prompting the former sheriff to file a federal lawsuit alleging the Senate process was unfair.
Lawyers for DeSantis and Senate President Bill Galvano asked U.S. District Judge Mark Walker to dismiss the case. The governor's attorneys have argued that DeSantis is not responsible for any alleged violation of Israel's rights, because the Senate conducted the proceedings leading to the vote that resulted in the sheriff's removal. The Senate's lawyers argue, in part, that the Senate is shielded from liability for legislative acts.
During a hearing conducted by telephone Friday, Israel's lawyer, Ben Kuehne, told Walker that the legislative immunity did not apply in the Senate's removal of Israel because the Senate essentially was behaving as a court and not as a legislative body deciding on political or policy-related matters.
Kuehne argued that the Florida Constitution requires that the removal of an elected official be based on "evidentiary consideration." He maintains that the Senate changed its rules after a special master, appointed by Galvano, held a trial, concluded that DeSantis' lawyers failed to present adequate evidence to justify Israel's removal and recommended that the lawman be reinstated.
The Senate Rules Committee in October considered Special Master Dudley Goodlette's report and heard emotional testimony from members of the public, including two parents of children who died in the Parkland school massacre. Days before the meeting, the committee accepted testimony that had not been submitted during the June trial. The committee supported removing Israel, a Democrat, from office. In a 25-15 vote on Oct. 23, the Republican-dominated full Senate stripped Israel from office.
Kuehne insisted throughout Friday's hearing that, following the trial, Israel was denied a "meaningful" opportunity to be heard as required by the due-process clause of the 14th Amendment.
DeSantis and the governor "decided to throw the rules of fairness out the window and utilize either raw political power or the inability of Sheriff Israel to do anything to present facts and contest positions taken by the governor that were not established" during the special master process, Kuehne told Walker.
But Walker appeared unpersuaded by his arguments.
"For the life of me, I don't understand where … the fact that there was a deviation from the Senate rules is determinative of if there is or is not a due-process claim," the judge said. "At each step of the way, he had an opportunity to respond and be heard. Help me understand why that's not the right way to look at the allegations in your complaint."
But "it was not real notice," Kuehne argued.
"It was not a real opportunity to contest, and it was not a real opportunity to be heard and submit our version in contrast to what the governor's office did submit," he added.
The removal process "is subject to review by this court if the process does not comport with federal constitutional standards," Kuehne told Walker.
But Walker told Israel's lawyer he did not "see a single allegation where you're told you can't talk," a position DeSantis attorney Nicholas Primrose backed.
"There's no allegation that Scott Israel was denied the same opportunity the governor's office was to present information" to the Senate committee, Primrose said.
Kuehne said the state Constitution "imbues in the Florida constitutional officer a right to that office that cannot be taken away, cannot be deprived, absent an evidentiary foundation."
Galvano lawyer Jeremiah Hawkes, however, said Kuehne's focus on the need for an elected official's removal to be based on evidence ignores the subjectivity involved in determinations about incompetence and neglect of duty.
Case law establishes that the governor has discretion when exercising his authority to remove someone from office, Hawkes argued.
"What one person thinks is incompetence may not be what the next person thinks is incompetence," he said. "There is a policy element to this. Are the people of Florida being well-served by this official?"
The governor makes that determination, and legislators decide if they agree, Hawkes added.
Primrose, a deputy general counsel in the governor's office, told the judge that "federal courts should be very reluctant to decide" about the way a state removes its officials.
"There are certainly aspects that Scott Israel is grumbling about and (he) doesn't like the outcome," but Israel failed to demonstrate that he was denied due process, Primrose argued.
Kuehne is asking Walker to order DeSantis to restore Israel as sheriff. The complaint strikes at the heart of citizens' ability to choose their leaders, Kuehne argued in closing.
"The result of this case essentially will, without being overly dramatic, test whether the people in Florida have the right to elect their elected officials or instead officials, when elected, are subject to the arbitrary and capricious action of a governor and a Senate without any opportunity for fairness, for due process and to have those decisions based on a fair and meaningful presentation of evidence and an opportunity to discuss the impact of that evidence," he said.
The Senate proceedings last fall sparked an emotional outcry from Parkland parents, who supported DeSantis' decision to remove the former sheriff. Israel's backers, meanwhile, showed up en masse to defend the long-serving law enforcement officer.
Speaking to reporters in October, Tony Montalto, whose daughter Gina was among the 14 students slain at the Parkland school, said the "systemic failures can only be blamed on incompetent leadership."
He called it "unfathomable" that Israel is seeking to be reinstated to his old job.
"Our 17 families have learned that without safety and security, nothing else matters," Montalto said, adding that Israel and his deputies "failed us when we needed them the most."
Dara Kam reports for the News Service of Florida.
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2024 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllSecond Circuit Ruling Expands VPPA Scope: What Organizations Need to Know
6 minute read'They Got All Bent Out of Shape:' Parkland Lawyers Clash With Each Other
Courts of Appeal Conflicted Over Rule 1.442(c)(3) When Claims for Damages Involve a Husband and Wife
Families Settle Court Battle Over Who Owns Parkland Killer's Name, Likeness
4 minute readTrending Stories
- 1Corporate Counsel's 2024 Award Winners Performed Legal Wizardry, Gave a Hand Up to Others
- 2Goodwin, Polsinelli, Fox Rothschild Find New Phila. Offices
- 3Helping Lawyers Move Away from ‘Grinding’ and Toward a ‘Flow’
- 4How GC-of-Year Sam Khichi Has Helped CVS Barrel Through Challenges
- 5A Website is Not a ‘Place.’ What Took So Long To Get This Right?
Who Got The Work
Michael G. Bongiorno, Andrew Scott Dulberg and Elizabeth E. Driscoll from Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr have stepped in to represent Symbotic Inc., an A.I.-enabled technology platform that focuses on increasing supply chain efficiency, and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The case, filed Oct. 2 in Massachusetts District Court by the Brown Law Firm on behalf of Stephen Austen, accuses certain officers and directors of misleading investors in regard to Symbotic's potential for margin growth by failing to disclose that the company was not equipped to timely deploy its systems or manage expenses through project delays. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Nathaniel M. Gorton, is 1:24-cv-12522, Austen v. Cohen et al.
Who Got The Work
Edmund Polubinski and Marie Killmond of Davis Polk & Wardwell have entered appearances for data platform software development company MongoDB and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The action, filed Oct. 7 in New York Southern District Court by the Brown Law Firm, accuses the company's directors and/or officers of falsely expressing confidence in the company’s restructuring of its sales incentive plan and downplaying the severity of decreases in its upfront commitments. The case is 1:24-cv-07594, Roy v. Ittycheria et al.
Who Got The Work
Amy O. Bruchs and Kurt F. Ellison of Michael Best & Friedrich have entered appearances for Epic Systems Corp. in a pending employment discrimination lawsuit. The suit was filed Sept. 7 in Wisconsin Western District Court by Levine Eisberner LLC and Siri & Glimstad on behalf of a project manager who claims that he was wrongfully terminated after applying for a religious exemption to the defendant's COVID-19 vaccine mandate. The case, assigned to U.S. Magistrate Judge Anita Marie Boor, is 3:24-cv-00630, Secker, Nathan v. Epic Systems Corporation.
Who Got The Work
David X. Sullivan, Thomas J. Finn and Gregory A. Hall from McCarter & English have entered appearances for Sunrun Installation Services in a pending civil rights lawsuit. The complaint was filed Sept. 4 in Connecticut District Court by attorney Robert M. Berke on behalf of former employee George Edward Steins, who was arrested and charged with employing an unregistered home improvement salesperson. The complaint alleges that had Sunrun informed the Connecticut Department of Consumer Protection that the plaintiff's employment had ended in 2017 and that he no longer held Sunrun's home improvement contractor license, he would not have been hit with charges, which were dismissed in May 2024. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Jeffrey A. Meyer, is 3:24-cv-01423, Steins v. Sunrun, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Greenberg Traurig shareholder Joshua L. Raskin has entered an appearance for boohoo.com UK Ltd. in a pending patent infringement lawsuit. The suit, filed Sept. 3 in Texas Eastern District Court by Rozier Hardt McDonough on behalf of Alto Dynamics, asserts five patents related to an online shopping platform. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Rodney Gilstrap, is 2:24-cv-00719, Alto Dynamics, LLC v. boohoo.com UK Limited.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250