Small Business Reorganization Act a Relief to Struggling Businesses During Pandemic
Without this relief, many small businesses would find themselves unable to navigate through Chapter 11 due to the costs and complexity of confirming a plan.
March 30, 2020 at 09:54 AM
5 minute read
The Small Business Reorganization Act of 2019 became effective Feb. 19. The law is designed to make Chapter 11 less expensive and more practical for small businesses and certain individuals whose secured and unsecured debts are no more than $2,725,625. Without this relief, many small businesses would find themselves unable to navigate through Chapter 11 due to the costs and complexity of confirming a plan.
The timing of the passage of this law is of great consequence considering the economic havoc the Covid-19 will reap on small businesses especially those in the travel, hospitality, retail, trade and services sectors upon which Florida relies so heavily. For example, whereas, a restaurant that was forced to shut its doors for one month or a retail store with either no sales or a precipitous drop would typically face an insurmountable hurdle to return to or remain in business, the new law will enable that same restaurant to resume operations or retail location to remain in business and develop a plan to repay either delinquent mortgage payments or rent, wages, salaries, taxes, and vendor debt without requiring the consent of their respective creditors. This crisis will likely motivate creditors to be flexible with their obligors to avoid catastrophic losses.
Unlike the prior Chapter 11, the new subchapter of Chapter 11 eliminates creditors committees, the requirement that the debtor file a disclosure statement, the absolute priority rule and modifies the requirements that the Debtor obtain the vote of at least one impaired creditor class. Creditors committees are designed to promote the interests of a group of creditors and often involve the retention of multiple professionals. The debtor becomes responsible for these fees and costs which adds another layer of expenses.
However, the two most critical changes for businesses pertain to the elimination of the absolute priority rule and modification of creditor voting rights. In order to obtain confirmation of a Chapter 11 plan for a debtor with debts in excess of $2.7-plus million, the debtor is required to obtain the acceptance of the plan by at least one class of creditors whose claims are impaired. If less than all the classes vote in favor of the plan, the debtor must "cramdown" the plan on dissenting creditors. The new law changes the voting and cramdown requirements by providing that so long as the debtor is paying the present value of secured claims and is using all its projected disposable income to pay creditors in a period between three to five years, depending on the length of the plan, the debtor's plan can be confirmed even though there is no accepting class of creditors if there is a reasonable likelihood that that the debtor will be able to make all payments proposed under the plan.
The absolute priority rule, which requires that creditors either receive all of their claim or agree to less before the debtor may receive or retain property, is eliminated. Under the new law, so long as the debtor is using all of its projected disposable income, much like an individual under Section 1129(a)(15), the debtor may pay unsecured creditors less than the full amount of their respective claims and obtain confirmation of its plan without having to inject new value as previously required.
One of the most fundamental powers the bankruptcy code grants debtors is the ability to cure delinquencies and defaults on non-residential leases. The Bankruptcy Code affords a debtor the opportunity to cure defaults in a reasonable period of time. A business either shuttered or otherwise affected by the COVID-19 can breathe a sigh of relief knowing that it can cure lease payments as well as any other defaults over a reasonable time and develop a plan based upon projected future cash flow.
These changes will make Chapter 11 a more viable alternative for businesses for whom Chapter 11 is too expensive and complicated. Legal fees and costs will be reduced in most cases, the process to emerge from bankruptcy will be streamlined and the odds of success will be increased for those who are eligible and avail themselves of this new opportunity to reorganize their financial affairs. For those businesses who were either forced to shutter their doors or saw dramatic decreases in revenue as a result of the COVID-19, the Small Business Reorganization Act offers a panacea to cure and undo the harm associated with the unprecedented disruption of their businesses and help their businesses remain viable.
Nicholas B. Bangos is of counsel with Diaz Reus & Targ in Miami and focuses his practice on bankruptcy and workouts. Contact him at [email protected].
|This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2024 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllNavigating Claims Under the Florida Telephone Solicitation Act and Florida Telemarketing Act
4 minute readSecond Circuit Ruling Expands VPPA Scope: What Organizations Need to Know
6 minute readLaw Firms Mentioned
Trending Stories
- 1Elon Musk Names Microsoft, Calif. AG to Amended OpenAI Suit
- 2Trump’s Plan to Purge Democracy
- 3Baltimore City Govt., After Winning Opioid Jury Trial, Preparing to Demand an Additional $11B for Abatement Costs
- 4X Joins Legal Attack on California's New Deepfakes Law
- 5Monsanto Wins Latest Philadelphia Roundup Trial
Who Got The Work
Michael G. Bongiorno, Andrew Scott Dulberg and Elizabeth E. Driscoll from Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr have stepped in to represent Symbotic Inc., an A.I.-enabled technology platform that focuses on increasing supply chain efficiency, and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The case, filed Oct. 2 in Massachusetts District Court by the Brown Law Firm on behalf of Stephen Austen, accuses certain officers and directors of misleading investors in regard to Symbotic's potential for margin growth by failing to disclose that the company was not equipped to timely deploy its systems or manage expenses through project delays. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Nathaniel M. Gorton, is 1:24-cv-12522, Austen v. Cohen et al.
Who Got The Work
Edmund Polubinski and Marie Killmond of Davis Polk & Wardwell have entered appearances for data platform software development company MongoDB and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The action, filed Oct. 7 in New York Southern District Court by the Brown Law Firm, accuses the company's directors and/or officers of falsely expressing confidence in the company’s restructuring of its sales incentive plan and downplaying the severity of decreases in its upfront commitments. The case is 1:24-cv-07594, Roy v. Ittycheria et al.
Who Got The Work
Amy O. Bruchs and Kurt F. Ellison of Michael Best & Friedrich have entered appearances for Epic Systems Corp. in a pending employment discrimination lawsuit. The suit was filed Sept. 7 in Wisconsin Western District Court by Levine Eisberner LLC and Siri & Glimstad on behalf of a project manager who claims that he was wrongfully terminated after applying for a religious exemption to the defendant's COVID-19 vaccine mandate. The case, assigned to U.S. Magistrate Judge Anita Marie Boor, is 3:24-cv-00630, Secker, Nathan v. Epic Systems Corporation.
Who Got The Work
David X. Sullivan, Thomas J. Finn and Gregory A. Hall from McCarter & English have entered appearances for Sunrun Installation Services in a pending civil rights lawsuit. The complaint was filed Sept. 4 in Connecticut District Court by attorney Robert M. Berke on behalf of former employee George Edward Steins, who was arrested and charged with employing an unregistered home improvement salesperson. The complaint alleges that had Sunrun informed the Connecticut Department of Consumer Protection that the plaintiff's employment had ended in 2017 and that he no longer held Sunrun's home improvement contractor license, he would not have been hit with charges, which were dismissed in May 2024. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Jeffrey A. Meyer, is 3:24-cv-01423, Steins v. Sunrun, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Greenberg Traurig shareholder Joshua L. Raskin has entered an appearance for boohoo.com UK Ltd. in a pending patent infringement lawsuit. The suit, filed Sept. 3 in Texas Eastern District Court by Rozier Hardt McDonough on behalf of Alto Dynamics, asserts five patents related to an online shopping platform. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Rodney Gilstrap, is 2:24-cv-00719, Alto Dynamics, LLC v. boohoo.com UK Limited.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250