Paycheck Protection Loans—Staying Afloat in the Midst of a Pandemic
The Coronavirus Aid, Relief, and Economic Security (CARES) Act was signed into law on March 27, and provides protection to millions of Americans employed by small businesses through additional avenues than those already in existence in order to assist small businesses to stay afloat amid the current coronavirus global pandemic and looming economic crisis.
March 31, 2020 at 05:15 PM
5 minute read
The Coronavirus Aid, Relief, and Economic Security (CARES) Act was signed into law on March 27, and provides protection to millions of Americans employed by small businesses through additional avenues than those already in existence in order to assist small businesses to stay afloat amid the current coronavirus global pandemic and looming economic crisis.
The CARES Act directs $349 billion toward a federal small business loan program called the Paycheck Protection Program (PPP) which is designed to provide capital to small businesses quickly and to incentivize job retention. This allows businesses to be proactive now in order to combat and mitigate potential losses.
The PPP applies to many types of businesses, including eligible nonprofits, veteran's organizations, tribal concerns, sole proprietorships with 500 or fewer employees (unless certain businesses in certain industries met certain standards) and will even apply to self-employed individuals as well as independent contractors. Businesses must satisfy the U.S. Small Business Administration's (SBA) definition of a small business concern as well as the size standards for small business. A size standard represents the largest size that a business (including its subsidiaries and affiliates) may be to be classified as a small business by the SBA, and are based on the average annual receipts or the average number of employees of a business. What classifies as a "small" business varies by industry. If a business owner is unsure of whether or not their business classifies as a small business, they should consult counsel to assist navigating the SBA's size standards in order to determine accurate classification.
The PPP provides an additional avenue than the low-interest federal disaster loans for working capital offered by the SBA. Although the SBA's disaster loans may overlap the PPP in terms of what the loans can be used for, the eligibility and amounts are different. Unlike the PPP, the disaster loans must be requested first by the Governor of a State or Territory and only offer up to $2 million in assistance to small businesses suffering substantial economic injury as a result of the coronavirus pandemic.
Some key information regarding the PPP and the loans from 1800 approved lenders is as follows:
- The loans provided under the PPP fall under Section 7 of the Small Business Act;
- Small businesses have until June 30, 2020 to apply;
- The loans are fully guaranteed by the U.S. government through Dec. 31, 2020;
- Provides a direct incentive for small businesses to keep employees on the payroll: |
- If all employees are kept on payroll for 8 weeks, then the SBA will forgive, on a tax-free basis, the portions of the loans that are used for payroll, rent, mortgage interest, utilities, healthcare benefits for employees, and may even cover interest payments on other debts;
- Up to 100% of the loan is forgivable;
- Loan forgiveness is contingent upon the employer: |
- Not reducing workforce during an 8-week period compared to other eight-week periods in 2019 and 2020;
- Not reducing the salary of wages paid to any employee who earned less than $100,000.00 in annualized salary by more than 25% during the covered period;
- Total will be reduced if a workforce is drawn down through attrition or if wages have been reduced;
- If a small business is forced to lay off employees due to economic conditions, then they may be able to preserve some of the loan guarantee by hiring those employees back;
- The maximum loan amount is the lesser of: |
- $10 million; or
- Sum of business's average monthly "payroll costs" for the 1-year period ending on the date the loan was made (alternate calculation available for seasonal employees) MULTIPLIED by 2.5 PLUS any disaster loan taken out after Jan. 1, 2020 that has been refinanced into a paycheck protection loan under the PPP;
- Businesses may still receive funding through the PPP if those businesses have pending SBA disaster assistance loans as long as each of the loans are being applied to different cost centers;
- The loans have a maximum maturity of 10 years;
- The interest rates on the loans under the PPP must not exceed 4%;
- The standard fees imposed under Section 7 of the Small Business Act are waived;
- No personal guarantee from business owners required;
- To receive a loan, a small business must have been in business as of Feb. 15, 2020;
- Loans are to be made available starting Friday, April 3, 2020, with the goal of same day loan evaluation services;
- All deferments through are now automatic until Dec. 31, 2020.
If small businesses have not acted in preparation and/or in response to the current and ensuing economic impacts from the coronavirus pandemic, they should begin preparing and assessing what will be needed to stay afloat through this uncertainty. As additional information is on its way, small businesses should consult counsel in order to discuss and assist deciding the most effective course of action, including applying for funding provided by the SBA, including those provided through the PPP.
For more information regarding the assistance provided through the SBA's disaster relief loans, please see the author's other article titled, COVID-19 Assistance from the Small Business Administration in Kelley Kronenberg's Resource Center: COVID-19, under the Business Law heading ( https://bit.ly/3dGNbFP ), or contact him through the information provided below.
Disclaimer: This article is intended to provide you with general information regarding the impact of a potential or actual coronavirus pandemic. The contents of this article are not intended to provide specific legal advice.
Harsh Arora, a partner in Kelley Kronenberg's Fort Lauderdale office, focuses his practice on business litigation and handling complex and international corporate transaction matters. He has represented multinational businesses as their outside general counsel. Contact him at [email protected] or 954-256-0743.
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2024 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllNavigating Claims Under the Florida Telephone Solicitation Act and Florida Telemarketing Act
4 minute readSecond Circuit Ruling Expands VPPA Scope: What Organizations Need to Know
6 minute readLaw Firms Mentioned
Trending Stories
- 1How to Support Law Firm Profitability: Train Partners Up
- 2Elon Musk Names Microsoft, Calif. AG to Amended OpenAI Suit
- 3Trump’s Plan to Purge Democracy
- 4Baltimore City Govt., After Winning Opioid Jury Trial, Preparing to Demand an Additional $11B for Abatement Costs
- 5X Joins Legal Attack on California's New Deepfakes Law
Who Got The Work
Michael G. Bongiorno, Andrew Scott Dulberg and Elizabeth E. Driscoll from Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr have stepped in to represent Symbotic Inc., an A.I.-enabled technology platform that focuses on increasing supply chain efficiency, and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The case, filed Oct. 2 in Massachusetts District Court by the Brown Law Firm on behalf of Stephen Austen, accuses certain officers and directors of misleading investors in regard to Symbotic's potential for margin growth by failing to disclose that the company was not equipped to timely deploy its systems or manage expenses through project delays. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Nathaniel M. Gorton, is 1:24-cv-12522, Austen v. Cohen et al.
Who Got The Work
Edmund Polubinski and Marie Killmond of Davis Polk & Wardwell have entered appearances for data platform software development company MongoDB and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The action, filed Oct. 7 in New York Southern District Court by the Brown Law Firm, accuses the company's directors and/or officers of falsely expressing confidence in the company’s restructuring of its sales incentive plan and downplaying the severity of decreases in its upfront commitments. The case is 1:24-cv-07594, Roy v. Ittycheria et al.
Who Got The Work
Amy O. Bruchs and Kurt F. Ellison of Michael Best & Friedrich have entered appearances for Epic Systems Corp. in a pending employment discrimination lawsuit. The suit was filed Sept. 7 in Wisconsin Western District Court by Levine Eisberner LLC and Siri & Glimstad on behalf of a project manager who claims that he was wrongfully terminated after applying for a religious exemption to the defendant's COVID-19 vaccine mandate. The case, assigned to U.S. Magistrate Judge Anita Marie Boor, is 3:24-cv-00630, Secker, Nathan v. Epic Systems Corporation.
Who Got The Work
David X. Sullivan, Thomas J. Finn and Gregory A. Hall from McCarter & English have entered appearances for Sunrun Installation Services in a pending civil rights lawsuit. The complaint was filed Sept. 4 in Connecticut District Court by attorney Robert M. Berke on behalf of former employee George Edward Steins, who was arrested and charged with employing an unregistered home improvement salesperson. The complaint alleges that had Sunrun informed the Connecticut Department of Consumer Protection that the plaintiff's employment had ended in 2017 and that he no longer held Sunrun's home improvement contractor license, he would not have been hit with charges, which were dismissed in May 2024. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Jeffrey A. Meyer, is 3:24-cv-01423, Steins v. Sunrun, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Greenberg Traurig shareholder Joshua L. Raskin has entered an appearance for boohoo.com UK Ltd. in a pending patent infringement lawsuit. The suit, filed Sept. 3 in Texas Eastern District Court by Rozier Hardt McDonough on behalf of Alto Dynamics, asserts five patents related to an online shopping platform. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Rodney Gilstrap, is 2:24-cv-00719, Alto Dynamics, LLC v. boohoo.com UK Limited.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250