Morgan & Morgan Files Class Action After Latest Marriott Data Breach
Three Tampa attorneys signed onto the case in the wake of Marriott's announcement that it's the victim of another data intrusion affecting as many as 5.2 million patrons.
April 02, 2020 at 04:12 PM
4 minute read
The original version of this story was published on Law.com
Morgan & Morgan sued Marriott International in federal court a day after the hotel chain announced it was the victim of another data breach affecting millions of customers.
Attorneys with Morgan & Morgan in Tampa filed the proposed class action in the District of Maryland. The suit, Springmeyer v. Marriott International, lists Las Vegas resident Pati Springmeyer as class representative and alleges the company failed to take required steps to protect its customers' data.
"These large companies know the risk posed by cyber criminals and continue to be cavalier with their customers' personal information. It's stunning that Marriott, which is already defending a significant data breach, we allege, would not have taken more care to secure its customers' information," Morgan & Morgan attorneys John Morgan and John Yanchunis said in a statement. "The fact that this breach comes less than two years after the first one we know about is damning, and they must be held accountable."
A spokeswoman for Marriott had no comment by deadline.
The lawsuit was filed in the wake of Marriott's announcement Tuesday that it had been the victim of another data intrusion, one that could affect as many as 5.2 million people. The company said the breach was discovered at the end of February after learning the login credentials of two employees had been compromised. The company said it believes the intrusion began in mid-January.
In its announcement, the company said personal identification information, including people's names, mailing addresses, email addresses, birth dates and phone numbers, were likely exposed, as well as information from their loyalty accounts with the hotel and some airlines.
The news comes less than 18 months after the company announced it had been subject to an even wider data breach. In November 2018, the company said the personal data of 500 million guests of its Starwood Hotels and Resorts Worldwide properties had been compromised.
Marriott has since lowered that figure to fewer than 383 million, but the information that was potentially exposed in that breach included passport numbers and credit card information — both of which Marriott said were not likely to have been exposed in the latest breach.
Dozens of lawsuits were filed in the wake of the initial breach, which has been litigated in federal court in Maryland, where the international hotel chain is headquartered.
In the 34-page complaint over the recent breach, Springmeyer contended the hotel chain failed to take required steps to safeguard customer information, and should have been well aware of its responsibilities, given the prior breach.
"Marriott made significant expenditures to market its hotels and hospitality services, but neglected to adequately invest in data security, despite the growing number of data intrusions and several years of well-publicized data breaches, including its own massive breach a little over a year ago," the complaint said.
Springmeyer said that, since the breach, she has been monitoring her accounts for any misuse of her information.
The suit alleges negligence, breaches of contract and confidence, and violation of Maryland's Consumer Protection Act.
The case was filed by Yanchunis, Jean Martin and Ryan McGee as well as William Murphy III of Murphy, Falcon & Murphy in Baltimore.
Yanchunis is a data breach litigation veteran after filing the first class action over the original Marriott breach and playing early or leading roles in breach cases against Yahoo, Facebook, Capital One, SunTrust and Exactis cases.
|READ THE COMPLAINT:
|This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2024 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllSecond Circuit Ruling Expands VPPA Scope: What Organizations Need to Know
6 minute read'They Got All Bent Out of Shape:' Parkland Lawyers Clash With Each Other
Courts of Appeal Conflicted Over Rule 1.442(c)(3) When Claims for Damages Involve a Husband and Wife
Families Settle Court Battle Over Who Owns Parkland Killer's Name, Likeness
4 minute readLaw Firms Mentioned
Trending Stories
- 1How to Support Law Firm Profitability: Train Partners Up
- 2Elon Musk Names Microsoft, Calif. AG to Amended OpenAI Suit
- 3Trump’s Plan to Purge Democracy
- 4Baltimore City Govt., After Winning Opioid Jury Trial, Preparing to Demand an Additional $11B for Abatement Costs
- 5X Joins Legal Attack on California's New Deepfakes Law
Who Got The Work
Michael G. Bongiorno, Andrew Scott Dulberg and Elizabeth E. Driscoll from Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr have stepped in to represent Symbotic Inc., an A.I.-enabled technology platform that focuses on increasing supply chain efficiency, and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The case, filed Oct. 2 in Massachusetts District Court by the Brown Law Firm on behalf of Stephen Austen, accuses certain officers and directors of misleading investors in regard to Symbotic's potential for margin growth by failing to disclose that the company was not equipped to timely deploy its systems or manage expenses through project delays. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Nathaniel M. Gorton, is 1:24-cv-12522, Austen v. Cohen et al.
Who Got The Work
Edmund Polubinski and Marie Killmond of Davis Polk & Wardwell have entered appearances for data platform software development company MongoDB and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The action, filed Oct. 7 in New York Southern District Court by the Brown Law Firm, accuses the company's directors and/or officers of falsely expressing confidence in the company’s restructuring of its sales incentive plan and downplaying the severity of decreases in its upfront commitments. The case is 1:24-cv-07594, Roy v. Ittycheria et al.
Who Got The Work
Amy O. Bruchs and Kurt F. Ellison of Michael Best & Friedrich have entered appearances for Epic Systems Corp. in a pending employment discrimination lawsuit. The suit was filed Sept. 7 in Wisconsin Western District Court by Levine Eisberner LLC and Siri & Glimstad on behalf of a project manager who claims that he was wrongfully terminated after applying for a religious exemption to the defendant's COVID-19 vaccine mandate. The case, assigned to U.S. Magistrate Judge Anita Marie Boor, is 3:24-cv-00630, Secker, Nathan v. Epic Systems Corporation.
Who Got The Work
David X. Sullivan, Thomas J. Finn and Gregory A. Hall from McCarter & English have entered appearances for Sunrun Installation Services in a pending civil rights lawsuit. The complaint was filed Sept. 4 in Connecticut District Court by attorney Robert M. Berke on behalf of former employee George Edward Steins, who was arrested and charged with employing an unregistered home improvement salesperson. The complaint alleges that had Sunrun informed the Connecticut Department of Consumer Protection that the plaintiff's employment had ended in 2017 and that he no longer held Sunrun's home improvement contractor license, he would not have been hit with charges, which were dismissed in May 2024. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Jeffrey A. Meyer, is 3:24-cv-01423, Steins v. Sunrun, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Greenberg Traurig shareholder Joshua L. Raskin has entered an appearance for boohoo.com UK Ltd. in a pending patent infringement lawsuit. The suit, filed Sept. 3 in Texas Eastern District Court by Rozier Hardt McDonough on behalf of Alto Dynamics, asserts five patents related to an online shopping platform. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Rodney Gilstrap, is 2:24-cv-00719, Alto Dynamics, LLC v. boohoo.com UK Limited.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250