Florida Chief Justice: Skip Work in Courts Until June
Several criminal defense attorneys see the new order as a reasonable, lifesaving approach in the coronavirus pandemic.
April 06, 2020 at 04:29 PM
3 minute read
With everyone contemplating how long they'll be working from home in a pandemic, the Florida Supreme Court basically locked down the state judicial system until June.
Chief Justice Charles Canady issued an emergency order Monday expanding previous deadlines to May 29, the last workday in May.
Previous orders suspended nonessential operations until April 17, which means the new order amounts to a six-week extension. Once again, Canady noted future extensions are possible due to the coronavirus.
The new timetable for suspending trial and most other in-person court operations was an unwelcome reality check for many, but some attorneys are taking the longer delay in stride. Social distancing is encouraged at required hearings, and remote technology is suggested for other proceedings.
"As a criminal defense attorney, I understand the delicate balance between public health and the rights of the accused. I hope that the Supreme Court reconsiders the closure dates as medical milestones are reached against this horrible pandemic," said Miami attorney Bruce Lehr of Lehr Levi & Mendez.
GrayRobinson criminal and white-collar defense attorney Brian Bieber said, "Based on the scientific and medical data presented to the legal community and frankly the country at large, our chief justice obviously has his finger correctly on the pulse of what is fair for all litigants in Florida. The order strikes the proper balance of maintaining the public's safety and its access to the courts."
Miami criminal defense attorney David Edelstein called the extension "eminently reasonable. It's much better than taking an incremental approach and shows that he has realistically assessed the situation," noting projections for the COVID-19 apex in Florida to be in the first week of May. "Extending it a few weeks beyond that makes sense."
Miami criminal defense attorney Jose Quinon said, "The judges are trying to save lives, the most important priority, although with a steep financial cost to litigants, lawyers and society at large." He believes there's "no other responsible way to do it."
The new order:
- Suspends jury selection and grand juries.
- Suspends speedy trial rules for criminal matters and noncriminal traffic infractions.
- Suspends a rule requiring clerks of court to immediately issue paperwork on final judgments in eviction cases.
- Extends emergency changes to notarization and oath requirements.
- Extends health-related limits on court-ordered family visits with children in state custody, including allowing visitation by remote electronic means in some instances.
On Tuesday, Canady issued an administrative order extending education and certification deadlines for mediators certified by the Supreme Court, matching earlier orders for other legal professionals.
Meanwhile, Miami-Dade Chief Circuit Judge Bertila Soto issued an order restricting the recording of remote proceedings without previous permission from the presiding judge. Use of electronic devices for email, text messages and instant messages is permitted.
Read the order:
Related stories:
Update on Florida Court Rule Changes in Response to COVID-19
South Florida Federal Criminal Cases Shift to Remote Operations
South Florida Courts Scale Back More Operations Due to COVID-19
New Federal, State Court Orders Issued for COVID-19 Operations in Florida
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2024 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllSecond Circuit Ruling Expands VPPA Scope: What Organizations Need to Know
6 minute read'They Got All Bent Out of Shape:' Parkland Lawyers Clash With Each Other
Courts of Appeal Conflicted Over Rule 1.442(c)(3) When Claims for Damages Involve a Husband and Wife
Families Settle Court Battle Over Who Owns Parkland Killer's Name, Likeness
4 minute readLaw Firms Mentioned
Trending Stories
- 1Biden Has Few Ways to Protect His Environmental Legacy, Say Lawyers, Advocates
- 2UN Treaty Enacting Cybercrime Standards Likely to Face Headwinds in US, Other Countries
- 3Clark Hill Acquires L&E Boutique in Mexico City, Adding 5 Lawyers
- 46th Circuit Judges Spar Over Constitutionality of Ohio’s Ballot Initiative Procedures
- 5On The Move: Polsinelli Adds Health Care Litigator in Nashville, Ex-SEC Enforcer Joins BCLP in Atlanta
Who Got The Work
Michael G. Bongiorno, Andrew Scott Dulberg and Elizabeth E. Driscoll from Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr have stepped in to represent Symbotic Inc., an A.I.-enabled technology platform that focuses on increasing supply chain efficiency, and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The case, filed Oct. 2 in Massachusetts District Court by the Brown Law Firm on behalf of Stephen Austen, accuses certain officers and directors of misleading investors in regard to Symbotic's potential for margin growth by failing to disclose that the company was not equipped to timely deploy its systems or manage expenses through project delays. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Nathaniel M. Gorton, is 1:24-cv-12522, Austen v. Cohen et al.
Who Got The Work
Edmund Polubinski and Marie Killmond of Davis Polk & Wardwell have entered appearances for data platform software development company MongoDB and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The action, filed Oct. 7 in New York Southern District Court by the Brown Law Firm, accuses the company's directors and/or officers of falsely expressing confidence in the company’s restructuring of its sales incentive plan and downplaying the severity of decreases in its upfront commitments. The case is 1:24-cv-07594, Roy v. Ittycheria et al.
Who Got The Work
Amy O. Bruchs and Kurt F. Ellison of Michael Best & Friedrich have entered appearances for Epic Systems Corp. in a pending employment discrimination lawsuit. The suit was filed Sept. 7 in Wisconsin Western District Court by Levine Eisberner LLC and Siri & Glimstad on behalf of a project manager who claims that he was wrongfully terminated after applying for a religious exemption to the defendant's COVID-19 vaccine mandate. The case, assigned to U.S. Magistrate Judge Anita Marie Boor, is 3:24-cv-00630, Secker, Nathan v. Epic Systems Corporation.
Who Got The Work
David X. Sullivan, Thomas J. Finn and Gregory A. Hall from McCarter & English have entered appearances for Sunrun Installation Services in a pending civil rights lawsuit. The complaint was filed Sept. 4 in Connecticut District Court by attorney Robert M. Berke on behalf of former employee George Edward Steins, who was arrested and charged with employing an unregistered home improvement salesperson. The complaint alleges that had Sunrun informed the Connecticut Department of Consumer Protection that the plaintiff's employment had ended in 2017 and that he no longer held Sunrun's home improvement contractor license, he would not have been hit with charges, which were dismissed in May 2024. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Jeffrey A. Meyer, is 3:24-cv-01423, Steins v. Sunrun, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Greenberg Traurig shareholder Joshua L. Raskin has entered an appearance for boohoo.com UK Ltd. in a pending patent infringement lawsuit. The suit, filed Sept. 3 in Texas Eastern District Court by Rozier Hardt McDonough on behalf of Alto Dynamics, asserts five patents related to an online shopping platform. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Rodney Gilstrap, is 2:24-cv-00719, Alto Dynamics, LLC v. boohoo.com UK Limited.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250