Nation's Biggest Funeral Home Faces Florida Lawsuit for Allegedly Exploiting Seniors
This South Florida putative class action lawsuit alleges a "bookkeeping sleight of hand" tricked senior citizens into prepaying for cremations in a way that maximized company cash flow but infringed on consumer rights.
April 07, 2020 at 06:40 PM
4 minute read
The nation's largest funeral and cremation services company is facing a putative class action lawsuit in the Southern District of Florida that raises novel questions about sales practices around prepaid cremations that allegedly flout a state law designed to protect senior citizens from exploitation.
Named plaintiff Nancy Taylor in West Palm Beach alleges six companies owned by Service Corp. International and 20 John Does used a "bookkeeping sleight of hand" to trick her and countless others into prepaying in a way that maximized cash flow and infringed on consumer rights.
These prepaid services enable customers to pay for their funeral and cremation services ahead of time to lock in current costs and avoid stress for family members after their death.
Under Florida law, the defendant must put at least 70% of the money customers prepaid for cremation services into a trust fund and customers are entitled to full refunds, according to the complaint. That way, if a company goes out of business, moves out of town or if a customer changes their mind, there's protection.
But the complaint alleges Service Corp. split its plan into two different contracts, "heavily discounting" cremation and funeral services but "vastly overcharging" for such merchandise as urns, flowers and guest books. As a result, plaintiff Taylor claims she was only offered a refund for the discounted services and not for the merchandise, and alleges Service Corp. only had put about 50% of what it should have put into a trust.
Chicago attorney Randall Ewing Jr. of Korein Tillery is handling the lawsuit with Leon Cosgrove attorneys Alec Schultz, Jeremy Kahn and John Byrne in Coral Gables.
They allege the company has done more than just make use of a legal loophole, and instead used a classic bait-and-switch scheme.
"They [the defendants] essentially box you into a situation that discourages you from exercising your statutory right to cancel the contract, or move it to another provider," Ewing said.
The defendants have not yet retained counsel, according to online case files, and did not immediately respond to a request for comment.
Though discovery is yet to begin, the plaintiff team estimates thousands or tens of thousands of people could have been affected by the alleged scheme.
The complaint claims that anyone who purchased this package paid $1,200 more than they should have. And because most of the alleged victims are senior citizens, Taylor's complaint claims the defendant should also be on the hook for enhanced civil penalties of up to $15,000 per violation.
Ewing said it was exactly this alleged behavior that the Florida Legislature had hoped to curb when it drafted provisions around preneed funeral and cremation services.
"In light of current events, it is more important than ever that providers of cremation services and other end-of-life services not exploit senior citizens or others, and that Florida laws protecting consumers' money, ensuring adequate portability of services among providers, and allowing for cancellation and refund of prepaid cremation services be enforced as intended, and not subverted through deceptive sales and accounting practices," Ewing said.
It's not the first time Service Corp. has run into legal trouble.
California Attorney General Xavier Becerra brought a similar lawsuit against the company in December, alleging the company's sales practices underfunded its trust fund by about $100 million.
Dozens of families sued Service Corp. in 2012 over allegations that two of its South Florida cemeteries improperly buried bodies and mishandled remains. The case resolved with a $100 million settlement.
U.S. District Judge Rodolfo Ruiz will preside over the case in the Southern District of Florida.
Read the complaint:
Read more:
Survivors of Pulse Nightclub Shooting Tested Florida's Negligence Law — and Lost
No Lift-Off for Lawsuit Alleging Trick Pricing on American Airlines' Website
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2025 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllLocal Boutique Expands Significantly, Hiring Litigator Who Won $63M Verdict Against City of Miami Commissioner
3 minute readGreenberg Traurig Combines Digital Infrastructure and Real Estate Groups, Anticipating Uptick in Demand
4 minute readUS Judge Cannon Blocks DOJ From Releasing Final Report in Trump Documents Probe
3 minute readPlaintiffs Allege Carollo Retaliated Over Bayfront Trust Accounting Discoveries
3 minute readLaw Firms Mentioned
Trending Stories
- 1Pro Hac Vice in Georgia: Rule Change for Nonresident Attorneys
- 2The Benefits of E-Filing for Affordable, Effortless and Equal Access to Justice
- 3AI and Social Media Fakes: Are You Protecting Your Brand?
- 4A Primer on Using Third-Party Depositions To Prove Your Case at Trial
- 5‘Catholic Charities v. Wisconsin Labor and Industry Review Commission’: Another Consequence of 'Hobby Lobby'?
Who Got The Work
J. Brugh Lower of Gibbons has entered an appearance for industrial equipment supplier Devco Corporation in a pending trademark infringement lawsuit. The suit, accusing the defendant of selling knock-off Graco products, was filed Dec. 18 in New Jersey District Court by Rivkin Radler on behalf of Graco Inc. and Graco Minnesota. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Zahid N. Quraishi, is 3:24-cv-11294, Graco Inc. et al v. Devco Corporation.
Who Got The Work
Rebecca Maller-Stein and Kent A. Yalowitz of Arnold & Porter Kaye Scholer have entered their appearances for Hanaco Venture Capital and its executives, Lior Prosor and David Frankel, in a pending securities lawsuit. The action, filed on Dec. 24 in New York Southern District Court by Zell, Aron & Co. on behalf of Goldeneye Advisors, accuses the defendants of negligently and fraudulently managing the plaintiff's $1 million investment. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Vernon S. Broderick, is 1:24-cv-09918, Goldeneye Advisors, LLC v. Hanaco Venture Capital, Ltd. et al.
Who Got The Work
Attorneys from A&O Shearman has stepped in as defense counsel for Toronto-Dominion Bank and other defendants in a pending securities class action. The suit, filed Dec. 11 in New York Southern District Court by Bleichmar Fonti & Auld, accuses the defendants of concealing the bank's 'pervasive' deficiencies in regards to its compliance with the Bank Secrecy Act and the quality of its anti-money laundering controls. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Arun Subramanian, is 1:24-cv-09445, Gonzalez v. The Toronto-Dominion Bank et al.
Who Got The Work
Crown Castle International, a Pennsylvania company providing shared communications infrastructure, has turned to Luke D. Wolf of Gordon Rees Scully Mansukhani to fend off a pending breach-of-contract lawsuit. The court action, filed Nov. 25 in Michigan Eastern District Court by Hooper Hathaway PC on behalf of The Town Residences LLC, accuses Crown Castle of failing to transfer approximately $30,000 in utility payments from T-Mobile in breach of a roof-top lease and assignment agreement. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Susan K. Declercq, is 2:24-cv-13131, The Town Residences LLC v. T-Mobile US, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Wilfred P. Coronato and Daniel M. Schwartz of McCarter & English have stepped in as defense counsel to Electrolux Home Products Inc. in a pending product liability lawsuit. The court action, filed Nov. 26 in New York Eastern District Court by Poulos Lopiccolo PC and Nagel Rice LLP on behalf of David Stern, alleges that the defendant's refrigerators’ drawers and shelving repeatedly break and fall apart within months after purchase. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Joan M. Azrack, is 2:24-cv-08204, Stern v. Electrolux Home Products, Inc.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250