Nation's Biggest Funeral Home Faces Florida Lawsuit for Allegedly Exploiting Seniors
This South Florida putative class action lawsuit alleges a "bookkeeping sleight of hand" tricked senior citizens into prepaying for cremations in a way that maximized company cash flow but infringed on consumer rights.
April 07, 2020 at 06:40 PM
4 minute read
The nation's largest funeral and cremation services company is facing a putative class action lawsuit in the Southern District of Florida that raises novel questions about sales practices around prepaid cremations that allegedly flout a state law designed to protect senior citizens from exploitation.
Named plaintiff Nancy Taylor in West Palm Beach alleges six companies owned by Service Corp. International and 20 John Does used a "bookkeeping sleight of hand" to trick her and countless others into prepaying in a way that maximized cash flow and infringed on consumer rights.
These prepaid services enable customers to pay for their funeral and cremation services ahead of time to lock in current costs and avoid stress for family members after their death.
Under Florida law, the defendant must put at least 70% of the money customers prepaid for cremation services into a trust fund and customers are entitled to full refunds, according to the complaint. That way, if a company goes out of business, moves out of town or if a customer changes their mind, there's protection.
But the complaint alleges Service Corp. split its plan into two different contracts, "heavily discounting" cremation and funeral services but "vastly overcharging" for such merchandise as urns, flowers and guest books. As a result, plaintiff Taylor claims she was only offered a refund for the discounted services and not for the merchandise, and alleges Service Corp. only had put about 50% of what it should have put into a trust.
Chicago attorney Randall Ewing Jr. of Korein Tillery is handling the lawsuit with Leon Cosgrove attorneys Alec Schultz, Jeremy Kahn and John Byrne in Coral Gables.
They allege the company has done more than just make use of a legal loophole, and instead used a classic bait-and-switch scheme.
"They [the defendants] essentially box you into a situation that discourages you from exercising your statutory right to cancel the contract, or move it to another provider," Ewing said.
The defendants have not yet retained counsel, according to online case files, and did not immediately respond to a request for comment.
Though discovery is yet to begin, the plaintiff team estimates thousands or tens of thousands of people could have been affected by the alleged scheme.
The complaint claims that anyone who purchased this package paid $1,200 more than they should have. And because most of the alleged victims are senior citizens, Taylor's complaint claims the defendant should also be on the hook for enhanced civil penalties of up to $15,000 per violation.
Ewing said it was exactly this alleged behavior that the Florida Legislature had hoped to curb when it drafted provisions around preneed funeral and cremation services.
"In light of current events, it is more important than ever that providers of cremation services and other end-of-life services not exploit senior citizens or others, and that Florida laws protecting consumers' money, ensuring adequate portability of services among providers, and allowing for cancellation and refund of prepaid cremation services be enforced as intended, and not subverted through deceptive sales and accounting practices," Ewing said.
It's not the first time Service Corp. has run into legal trouble.
California Attorney General Xavier Becerra brought a similar lawsuit against the company in December, alleging the company's sales practices underfunded its trust fund by about $100 million.
Dozens of families sued Service Corp. in 2012 over allegations that two of its South Florida cemeteries improperly buried bodies and mishandled remains. The case resolved with a $100 million settlement.
U.S. District Judge Rodolfo Ruiz will preside over the case in the Southern District of Florida.
|Read the complaint:
Read more:
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2024 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllRogge Dunn Represents Florida Trucking Firm in Civil RICO Suit Against Worldwide Express
4 minute readLaw Firms Mentioned
Trending Stories
- 1Call for Nominations: Elite Trial Lawyers 2025
- 2Senate Judiciary Dems Release Report on Supreme Court Ethics
- 3Senate Confirms Last 2 of Biden's California Judicial Nominees
- 4Morrison & Foerster Doles Out Year-End and Special Bonuses, Raises Base Compensation for Associates
- 5Tom Girardi to Surrender to Federal Authorities on Jan. 7
Who Got The Work
Michael G. Bongiorno, Andrew Scott Dulberg and Elizabeth E. Driscoll from Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr have stepped in to represent Symbotic Inc., an A.I.-enabled technology platform that focuses on increasing supply chain efficiency, and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The case, filed Oct. 2 in Massachusetts District Court by the Brown Law Firm on behalf of Stephen Austen, accuses certain officers and directors of misleading investors in regard to Symbotic's potential for margin growth by failing to disclose that the company was not equipped to timely deploy its systems or manage expenses through project delays. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Nathaniel M. Gorton, is 1:24-cv-12522, Austen v. Cohen et al.
Who Got The Work
Edmund Polubinski and Marie Killmond of Davis Polk & Wardwell have entered appearances for data platform software development company MongoDB and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The action, filed Oct. 7 in New York Southern District Court by the Brown Law Firm, accuses the company's directors and/or officers of falsely expressing confidence in the company’s restructuring of its sales incentive plan and downplaying the severity of decreases in its upfront commitments. The case is 1:24-cv-07594, Roy v. Ittycheria et al.
Who Got The Work
Amy O. Bruchs and Kurt F. Ellison of Michael Best & Friedrich have entered appearances for Epic Systems Corp. in a pending employment discrimination lawsuit. The suit was filed Sept. 7 in Wisconsin Western District Court by Levine Eisberner LLC and Siri & Glimstad on behalf of a project manager who claims that he was wrongfully terminated after applying for a religious exemption to the defendant's COVID-19 vaccine mandate. The case, assigned to U.S. Magistrate Judge Anita Marie Boor, is 3:24-cv-00630, Secker, Nathan v. Epic Systems Corporation.
Who Got The Work
David X. Sullivan, Thomas J. Finn and Gregory A. Hall from McCarter & English have entered appearances for Sunrun Installation Services in a pending civil rights lawsuit. The complaint was filed Sept. 4 in Connecticut District Court by attorney Robert M. Berke on behalf of former employee George Edward Steins, who was arrested and charged with employing an unregistered home improvement salesperson. The complaint alleges that had Sunrun informed the Connecticut Department of Consumer Protection that the plaintiff's employment had ended in 2017 and that he no longer held Sunrun's home improvement contractor license, he would not have been hit with charges, which were dismissed in May 2024. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Jeffrey A. Meyer, is 3:24-cv-01423, Steins v. Sunrun, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Greenberg Traurig shareholder Joshua L. Raskin has entered an appearance for boohoo.com UK Ltd. in a pending patent infringement lawsuit. The suit, filed Sept. 3 in Texas Eastern District Court by Rozier Hardt McDonough on behalf of Alto Dynamics, asserts five patents related to an online shopping platform. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Rodney Gilstrap, is 2:24-cv-00719, Alto Dynamics, LLC v. boohoo.com UK Limited.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250