Adapting the Justice System to the New Coronavirus Normal
For those of us who regularly practice in the Florida courts, it is both somewhat unrealistic and unnecessary for absolutely everything to grind to a screeching halt for an unknown and likely substantial period of time.
April 08, 2020 at 12:45 PM
5 minute read
The coronavirus pandemic has almost caused the Florida court system to completely shut down. Most of the buildings are closed for business, as they should be. Nonetheless, for those of us who regularly practice in the Florida courts, it is both somewhat unrealistic and unnecessary for absolutely everything to grind to a screeching halt for an unknown and likely substantial period of time. For much of the business world, and for many attorneys, working remotely has been a reality for the better part of the last decade. So, why is it that the Florida courts have been so slow to adapt? Does the legal community and the clients it serves have to remain paralyzed with trials stacking up and hearing calendars cancelled? The answer is no. Here are some suggestions of things we can do now to make this new reality work for our clients so that when the pandemic is over, which we all hope will be soon, we are not hopelessly behind.
Virtual Hearings. Most court hearings do not require witness testimony. Court call remains available. The entire court docket for every case is now available online. Judges can access their email remotely just like everyone else so they can read courtesy copies prior to any hearing. And, of course, lawyers are now using Zoom, GoToMeeting and FaceTime. The Dade County Bar Association just conducted a board of directors meeting using GoToMeeting that was attended by 41 people who could all see and hear one another.
In sum, the Florida legal community can utilize the time we have been given to knock out a backlog of motion calendar hearings which stretched months into the future in some courthouses even before the arrival of coronavirus.
Virtual Bench Trials. Our law firm recently conducted a bench trial in the Family Court with two witnesses who were scheduled to testify from their respective locations in Europe. The parties had stipulated to the identity of these two witnesses. The idea was that the lawyers would call the witnesses on Skype so the judge could see the witnesses and evaluate their credibility. Seems simple right? Unfortunately not. Apparently, it is very difficult to obtain a reliable Wi-Fi connection in the Miami-Dade Circuit Court. We ultimately were able to have one witness testify through Skype. However, the second witness found it easier to get on an airplane and fly to Miami.
This does not have to be the case, however. The problem with this testimony was not necessarily technological; rather, it was the building itself that was not equipped for extended communication over Wi-Fi. This issue is likely to be cured with Miami-Dade Circuit Court judges and all the lawyers and potential witnesses now working from home. Zoom, GoToMeeting and FaceTime can accommodate multiple parties appearing simultaneously using a shared screen.
The current crisis presents an opportunity to start using the technology the way it was intended to be used.
Virtual Depositions.Our firm has an active construction litigation practice which means that each case can routinely have more than 15 parties. This week our firm conducted its first virtual deposition through the use of Zoom. With similar applications like GoToMeeting, Skype and FaceTime, all the lawyers and the witness will be able to see and hear one another. Thanks to the Florida Supreme Court's March 18 order allowing court reporters to swear in witnesses remotely, the witness doesn't even have to be in the same room as the court reporter. Problems with objections can be cured by each lawyer simply announcing their name before an objection is raised.
Virtual Mediation.Most of us who practice before the Florida courts have at least one case (likely more than one) which is ripe for mediation. Now is probably a good time to get rid of it. Call your favorite local mediator, get your client's consent, clear dates, email the mediator your mediation summary and send around to all parties a videoconferencing invitation. When the case is settled, you can share the settlement agreement with the parties via email just like any other contract. When the settlement agreement is signed, you can scan the signature using your iPhone with an application like Genius Scan, which is available in the Apple Store for free.
While there certainly are constitutional concerns with things like jury trials, which may not be ready for this process, do the Florida courts really have to close down completely because of the crisis we are currently in? If that does in fact happen, imagine what things will be like when the crisis hopefully ends. That is not something that anyone should be looking forward to. If we take reasonable interim steps, we may be able to minimize the damage that this crisis will cause to the court system. If this crisis stretches through the summer, there could be long-term negative consequences.
Roger Slade is a shareholder at Haber Law. He concentrates his practice in commercial and business litigation, international business law and litigation, shareholder and partnership litigation, and family law litigation. He can be reached at [email protected].
Jacob Epstein is an associate at the firm. He concentrates his practice in the areas of business litigation, condominium and community association law, construction law, and real estate litigation. He can be reached at [email protected].
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2024 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllNavigating Claims Under the Florida Telephone Solicitation Act and Florida Telemarketing Act
4 minute readSecond Circuit Ruling Expands VPPA Scope: What Organizations Need to Know
6 minute readTrending Stories
- 1Gibson Dunn Sued By Crypto Client After Lateral Hire Causes Conflict of Interest
- 2Trump's Solicitor General Expected to 'Flip' Prelogar's Positions at Supreme Court
- 3Pharmacy Lawyers See Promise in NY Regulator's Curbs on PBM Industry
- 4Outgoing USPTO Director Kathi Vidal: ‘We All Want the Country to Be in a Better Place’
- 5Supreme Court Will Review Constitutionality Of FCC's Universal Service Fund
Who Got The Work
Michael G. Bongiorno, Andrew Scott Dulberg and Elizabeth E. Driscoll from Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr have stepped in to represent Symbotic Inc., an A.I.-enabled technology platform that focuses on increasing supply chain efficiency, and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The case, filed Oct. 2 in Massachusetts District Court by the Brown Law Firm on behalf of Stephen Austen, accuses certain officers and directors of misleading investors in regard to Symbotic's potential for margin growth by failing to disclose that the company was not equipped to timely deploy its systems or manage expenses through project delays. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Nathaniel M. Gorton, is 1:24-cv-12522, Austen v. Cohen et al.
Who Got The Work
Edmund Polubinski and Marie Killmond of Davis Polk & Wardwell have entered appearances for data platform software development company MongoDB and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The action, filed Oct. 7 in New York Southern District Court by the Brown Law Firm, accuses the company's directors and/or officers of falsely expressing confidence in the company’s restructuring of its sales incentive plan and downplaying the severity of decreases in its upfront commitments. The case is 1:24-cv-07594, Roy v. Ittycheria et al.
Who Got The Work
Amy O. Bruchs and Kurt F. Ellison of Michael Best & Friedrich have entered appearances for Epic Systems Corp. in a pending employment discrimination lawsuit. The suit was filed Sept. 7 in Wisconsin Western District Court by Levine Eisberner LLC and Siri & Glimstad on behalf of a project manager who claims that he was wrongfully terminated after applying for a religious exemption to the defendant's COVID-19 vaccine mandate. The case, assigned to U.S. Magistrate Judge Anita Marie Boor, is 3:24-cv-00630, Secker, Nathan v. Epic Systems Corporation.
Who Got The Work
David X. Sullivan, Thomas J. Finn and Gregory A. Hall from McCarter & English have entered appearances for Sunrun Installation Services in a pending civil rights lawsuit. The complaint was filed Sept. 4 in Connecticut District Court by attorney Robert M. Berke on behalf of former employee George Edward Steins, who was arrested and charged with employing an unregistered home improvement salesperson. The complaint alleges that had Sunrun informed the Connecticut Department of Consumer Protection that the plaintiff's employment had ended in 2017 and that he no longer held Sunrun's home improvement contractor license, he would not have been hit with charges, which were dismissed in May 2024. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Jeffrey A. Meyer, is 3:24-cv-01423, Steins v. Sunrun, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Greenberg Traurig shareholder Joshua L. Raskin has entered an appearance for boohoo.com UK Ltd. in a pending patent infringement lawsuit. The suit, filed Sept. 3 in Texas Eastern District Court by Rozier Hardt McDonough on behalf of Alto Dynamics, asserts five patents related to an online shopping platform. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Rodney Gilstrap, is 2:24-cv-00719, Alto Dynamics, LLC v. boohoo.com UK Limited.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250