Adapting the Justice System to the New Coronavirus Normal
For those of us who regularly practice in the Florida courts, it is both somewhat unrealistic and unnecessary for absolutely everything to grind to a screeching halt for an unknown and likely substantial period of time.
April 08, 2020 at 12:45 PM
5 minute read
The coronavirus pandemic has almost caused the Florida court system to completely shut down. Most of the buildings are closed for business, as they should be. Nonetheless, for those of us who regularly practice in the Florida courts, it is both somewhat unrealistic and unnecessary for absolutely everything to grind to a screeching halt for an unknown and likely substantial period of time. For much of the business world, and for many attorneys, working remotely has been a reality for the better part of the last decade. So, why is it that the Florida courts have been so slow to adapt? Does the legal community and the clients it serves have to remain paralyzed with trials stacking up and hearing calendars cancelled? The answer is no. Here are some suggestions of things we can do now to make this new reality work for our clients so that when the pandemic is over, which we all hope will be soon, we are not hopelessly behind.
Virtual Hearings. Most court hearings do not require witness testimony. Court call remains available. The entire court docket for every case is now available online. Judges can access their email remotely just like everyone else so they can read courtesy copies prior to any hearing. And, of course, lawyers are now using Zoom, GoToMeeting and FaceTime. The Dade County Bar Association just conducted a board of directors meeting using GoToMeeting that was attended by 41 people who could all see and hear one another.
In sum, the Florida legal community can utilize the time we have been given to knock out a backlog of motion calendar hearings which stretched months into the future in some courthouses even before the arrival of coronavirus.
Virtual Bench Trials. Our law firm recently conducted a bench trial in the Family Court with two witnesses who were scheduled to testify from their respective locations in Europe. The parties had stipulated to the identity of these two witnesses. The idea was that the lawyers would call the witnesses on Skype so the judge could see the witnesses and evaluate their credibility. Seems simple right? Unfortunately not. Apparently, it is very difficult to obtain a reliable Wi-Fi connection in the Miami-Dade Circuit Court. We ultimately were able to have one witness testify through Skype. However, the second witness found it easier to get on an airplane and fly to Miami.
This does not have to be the case, however. The problem with this testimony was not necessarily technological; rather, it was the building itself that was not equipped for extended communication over Wi-Fi. This issue is likely to be cured with Miami-Dade Circuit Court judges and all the lawyers and potential witnesses now working from home. Zoom, GoToMeeting and FaceTime can accommodate multiple parties appearing simultaneously using a shared screen.
The current crisis presents an opportunity to start using the technology the way it was intended to be used.
Virtual Depositions.Our firm has an active construction litigation practice which means that each case can routinely have more than 15 parties. This week our firm conducted its first virtual deposition through the use of Zoom. With similar applications like GoToMeeting, Skype and FaceTime, all the lawyers and the witness will be able to see and hear one another. Thanks to the Florida Supreme Court's March 18 order allowing court reporters to swear in witnesses remotely, the witness doesn't even have to be in the same room as the court reporter. Problems with objections can be cured by each lawyer simply announcing their name before an objection is raised.
Virtual Mediation.Most of us who practice before the Florida courts have at least one case (likely more than one) which is ripe for mediation. Now is probably a good time to get rid of it. Call your favorite local mediator, get your client's consent, clear dates, email the mediator your mediation summary and send around to all parties a videoconferencing invitation. When the case is settled, you can share the settlement agreement with the parties via email just like any other contract. When the settlement agreement is signed, you can scan the signature using your iPhone with an application like Genius Scan, which is available in the Apple Store for free.
While there certainly are constitutional concerns with things like jury trials, which may not be ready for this process, do the Florida courts really have to close down completely because of the crisis we are currently in? If that does in fact happen, imagine what things will be like when the crisis hopefully ends. That is not something that anyone should be looking forward to. If we take reasonable interim steps, we may be able to minimize the damage that this crisis will cause to the court system. If this crisis stretches through the summer, there could be long-term negative consequences.
Roger Slade is a shareholder at Haber Law. He concentrates his practice in commercial and business litigation, international business law and litigation, shareholder and partnership litigation, and family law litigation. He can be reached at [email protected].
Jacob Epstein is an associate at the firm. He concentrates his practice in the areas of business litigation, condominium and community association law, construction law, and real estate litigation. He can be reached at [email protected].
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2025 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllLeveraging the Power of Local Chambers of Commerce: A Second-Career Lawyer’s Guide to Building a Thriving Practice
5 minute readCFPB Proposes Rule to Regulate Data Brokers Selling Sensitive Information
5 minute readEssential Labor Shifts: Navigating Noncompetes, Workplace Politics and the AI Revolution
Initial Steps to Set Up a Fla. Appeal: Your Future Self (or Appellate Attorney) Will Thank You
6 minute readTrending Stories
- 1Court Rejects San Francisco's Challenge to Robotaxi Licenses
- 2'Be Prepared and Practice': Paul Hastings' Michelle Reed Breaks Down Firm's First SEC Cybersecurity Incident Disclosure Report
- 3Lina Khan Gives Up the Gavel After Contentious 4 Years as FTC Chair
- 4Allstate Is Using Cell Phone Data to Raise Prices, Attorney General Claims
- 5Epiq Announces AI Discovery Assistant, Initially Developed by Laer AI, With Help From Sullivan & Cromwell
Who Got The Work
J. Brugh Lower of Gibbons has entered an appearance for industrial equipment supplier Devco Corporation in a pending trademark infringement lawsuit. The suit, accusing the defendant of selling knock-off Graco products, was filed Dec. 18 in New Jersey District Court by Rivkin Radler on behalf of Graco Inc. and Graco Minnesota. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Zahid N. Quraishi, is 3:24-cv-11294, Graco Inc. et al v. Devco Corporation.
Who Got The Work
Rebecca Maller-Stein and Kent A. Yalowitz of Arnold & Porter Kaye Scholer have entered their appearances for Hanaco Venture Capital and its executives, Lior Prosor and David Frankel, in a pending securities lawsuit. The action, filed on Dec. 24 in New York Southern District Court by Zell, Aron & Co. on behalf of Goldeneye Advisors, accuses the defendants of negligently and fraudulently managing the plaintiff's $1 million investment. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Vernon S. Broderick, is 1:24-cv-09918, Goldeneye Advisors, LLC v. Hanaco Venture Capital, Ltd. et al.
Who Got The Work
Attorneys from A&O Shearman has stepped in as defense counsel for Toronto-Dominion Bank and other defendants in a pending securities class action. The suit, filed Dec. 11 in New York Southern District Court by Bleichmar Fonti & Auld, accuses the defendants of concealing the bank's 'pervasive' deficiencies in regards to its compliance with the Bank Secrecy Act and the quality of its anti-money laundering controls. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Arun Subramanian, is 1:24-cv-09445, Gonzalez v. The Toronto-Dominion Bank et al.
Who Got The Work
Crown Castle International, a Pennsylvania company providing shared communications infrastructure, has turned to Luke D. Wolf of Gordon Rees Scully Mansukhani to fend off a pending breach-of-contract lawsuit. The court action, filed Nov. 25 in Michigan Eastern District Court by Hooper Hathaway PC on behalf of The Town Residences LLC, accuses Crown Castle of failing to transfer approximately $30,000 in utility payments from T-Mobile in breach of a roof-top lease and assignment agreement. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Susan K. Declercq, is 2:24-cv-13131, The Town Residences LLC v. T-Mobile US, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Wilfred P. Coronato and Daniel M. Schwartz of McCarter & English have stepped in as defense counsel to Electrolux Home Products Inc. in a pending product liability lawsuit. The court action, filed Nov. 26 in New York Eastern District Court by Poulos Lopiccolo PC and Nagel Rice LLP on behalf of David Stern, alleges that the defendant's refrigerators’ drawers and shelving repeatedly break and fall apart within months after purchase. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Joan M. Azrack, is 2:24-cv-08204, Stern v. Electrolux Home Products, Inc.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250