Attorneys Are Using Interactive Tools to Pinpoint COVID-19 Lawsuits in Federal and State Courts
"To the extent that the data that we are pulling together here related to lawsuits become robust enough to get meaningful data analytics out of it," said Torsten M. Kracht, a partner at Hunton Andrews Kurth.
April 17, 2020 at 02:15 PM
3 minute read
Lawyers are saving time by using computer analytics to pinpoint key coronavirus litigation pending in courts across the country.
Torsten M. Kracht, a partner at Hunton Andrews Kurth, says his firm is working with a data service provider to show publicly available data about those cases. Its new interactive map streamlines the process of identifying national and statewide COVID-19 lawsuits.
"If you look at our map and you click on Connecticut, for example, you'll see that there were three complaints that we identified," Kracht said. "The balance of the cases that you are seeing in New York is a product of having more commercial activity in New York than you do in Connecticut generally."
As of April 17, New York has 143 pending COVID-19 actions, according to the interactive map, outpacing other states. The filing date starts March 13, where one complaint had been filed in New York and 25 complaints had been filed across the country. The chart shows progressive increases as nearly each day litigation is commenced in New York, versus the total amount of cases filed nationally.
Another chart with a table entitled "NOS Description" gives a breakdown of the nature of the claims asserted in each complaint. It shows that 113 complaints filed in New York are related to claims arising from "prison condition," four concern "general" issues and two for "recovery of overpayment and enforcement judgment."
"We take data from a couple of different sources and we use the coding of those cases that were filed," Kracht said. "The federal cover sheet has a couple of check boxes on the front or MOS code. When the plaintiff files that case, he checks one or more of those boxes to indicate what type of lawsuit it is. And that's the foundation of the MOS descriptions that appear in that lower left-hand corner of our screen."
The filings in other state courts were more complicated to input into the interactive chart. Since each state has its own form of civil cover sheet for the plaintiff to describe the nature of the claims asserted in the action, some states' actions could be inputted by code, while others required manual input.
"And then, we'll put it into that bucket," Kracht said. "That's how we get to this sortable map here of all the cases that have been filed in the state and federal courts for a particular jurisdiction."
A version for the firm's clients includes a case summary that pairs with each action described in any given category. So, if a lawyer wants to learn more about the 19 coronavirus marine cases that have been filed nationally, he or she can quickly browse the summary of the 16 cases filed in California and the three cases filed in Florida. That summary makes it easier for the lawyer to decide if reading the entire case file is appropriate.
While Kracht admits the system is not capturing all of the cases at the moment, he says if there is client interest, his firm will continue building out the database.
"To the extent that the data that we are pulling together here related to lawsuits become robust enough to get meaningful data analytics out of it," Kracht said. "That's part of the plan for where this tracker will go."
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2024 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllFrom ‘Deep Sadness’ to Little Concern, Gaetz’s Nomination Draws Sharp Reaction From Lawyers
7 minute readTrump's Lawyers Speak Out: 'The President Had the Confidence to Retain Me'
Law Firms Mentioned
Trending Stories
- 1Gibson Dunn Sued By Crypto Client After Lateral Hire Causes Conflict of Interest
- 2Trump's Solicitor General Expected to 'Flip' Prelogar's Positions at Supreme Court
- 3Pharmacy Lawyers See Promise in NY Regulator's Curbs on PBM Industry
- 4Outgoing USPTO Director Kathi Vidal: ‘We All Want the Country to Be in a Better Place’
- 5Supreme Court Will Review Constitutionality Of FCC's Universal Service Fund
Who Got The Work
Michael G. Bongiorno, Andrew Scott Dulberg and Elizabeth E. Driscoll from Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr have stepped in to represent Symbotic Inc., an A.I.-enabled technology platform that focuses on increasing supply chain efficiency, and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The case, filed Oct. 2 in Massachusetts District Court by the Brown Law Firm on behalf of Stephen Austen, accuses certain officers and directors of misleading investors in regard to Symbotic's potential for margin growth by failing to disclose that the company was not equipped to timely deploy its systems or manage expenses through project delays. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Nathaniel M. Gorton, is 1:24-cv-12522, Austen v. Cohen et al.
Who Got The Work
Edmund Polubinski and Marie Killmond of Davis Polk & Wardwell have entered appearances for data platform software development company MongoDB and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The action, filed Oct. 7 in New York Southern District Court by the Brown Law Firm, accuses the company's directors and/or officers of falsely expressing confidence in the company’s restructuring of its sales incentive plan and downplaying the severity of decreases in its upfront commitments. The case is 1:24-cv-07594, Roy v. Ittycheria et al.
Who Got The Work
Amy O. Bruchs and Kurt F. Ellison of Michael Best & Friedrich have entered appearances for Epic Systems Corp. in a pending employment discrimination lawsuit. The suit was filed Sept. 7 in Wisconsin Western District Court by Levine Eisberner LLC and Siri & Glimstad on behalf of a project manager who claims that he was wrongfully terminated after applying for a religious exemption to the defendant's COVID-19 vaccine mandate. The case, assigned to U.S. Magistrate Judge Anita Marie Boor, is 3:24-cv-00630, Secker, Nathan v. Epic Systems Corporation.
Who Got The Work
David X. Sullivan, Thomas J. Finn and Gregory A. Hall from McCarter & English have entered appearances for Sunrun Installation Services in a pending civil rights lawsuit. The complaint was filed Sept. 4 in Connecticut District Court by attorney Robert M. Berke on behalf of former employee George Edward Steins, who was arrested and charged with employing an unregistered home improvement salesperson. The complaint alleges that had Sunrun informed the Connecticut Department of Consumer Protection that the plaintiff's employment had ended in 2017 and that he no longer held Sunrun's home improvement contractor license, he would not have been hit with charges, which were dismissed in May 2024. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Jeffrey A. Meyer, is 3:24-cv-01423, Steins v. Sunrun, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Greenberg Traurig shareholder Joshua L. Raskin has entered an appearance for boohoo.com UK Ltd. in a pending patent infringement lawsuit. The suit, filed Sept. 3 in Texas Eastern District Court by Rozier Hardt McDonough on behalf of Alto Dynamics, asserts five patents related to an online shopping platform. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Rodney Gilstrap, is 2:24-cv-00719, Alto Dynamics, LLC v. boohoo.com UK Limited.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250