What Homeowner Associations Need to Know About Accounting Standard Changes for Revenue Recognition
In 2016, the Financial Accounting Standards Board (FASB) released a new standard, ASC 606 - Revenue from Contracts with Customers. The new standard is effective for Dec. 31, 2019, financial statements, and the changes in revenue recognition it has created, have a significant impact for condominium and homeowner associations (community associations).
April 23, 2020 at 03:15 PM
4 minute read
In 2016, the Financial Accounting Standards Board (FASB) released a new standard, ASC 606 – Revenue from Contracts with Customers. The new standard is effective for Dec. 31, 2019, financial statements, and the changes in revenue recognition it has created, have a significant impact for condominium and homeowner associations (community associations).
This new standard should be of particular concern to Floridians because of our large and growing number of such community associations. According to the Community Associations Institute (CAI), Florida currently leads the nation in community associations with a whopping 48,250. Even a state like New York, (including New York City) only has around 14,000. Furthermore, it is estimated that approximately 50% of Florida's population live in community associations.
This standard is applicable to community associations because the relationship between an association and its members meets the FASB's definition of a "contract with a customer." The primary revenues for most associations are operating assessments and assessments for future major repairs and replacements, commonly referred to as "reserve assessments." Under ASC 606, revenue is recognized when Associations satisfy their performance obligations.
Here is how the new standard applies to these two major forms of revenue:
- Operating Assessments: The performance obligation for operating assessments is the maintenance, management and operation of common area property. This performance obligation is generally met on an ongoing basis throughout the fiscal year. Therefore, revenue is recognized on a periodic basis, as it is in current practice.
- Reserve Assessments: The performance obligation for reserve assessments is the expenditure of the assessed funds for their intended purpose(s). Accordingly, revenue will be recognized when the related expenditures occur. Unspent reserves will be presented as a liability on the balance sheet. This is a very significant change from current practice. Previously, assessments for reserves were reflected as revenues of the reserve fund at the time they were assessed to the members, and unspent reserve funds were a part of the reserves fund balance, which is equivalent to retained earnings for commercial for-profit entities.
While these are the two primary sources of income for most community associations, the recognition of other sources of income may be impacted by ASC 606.
|Prior Year's Reserve Fund Balance Restated
Under ASC 606, in the year of adoption of the standard, the financial statements should reflect a restatement of the opening fund balance.
|Overall Impact of ASC 606 Compliance
Of course, community associations are not the only types of entities that are affected by the implementation of ASC 606. Almost all businesses will be impacted by this new approach to revenue recognition. While compliance for privately held companies is just starting, publicly-owned companies have already been at it for a year, and indications are that compliance has proved to be very complicated.
According to ASC 606, organizations must recognize revenue on financial statements to "depict the transfer of goods and services to customers in an amount that reflects what the company expects to be entitled to in exchange for those goods or services." Which, in other words, means at the completion of the work, services, or deliverables that were "contracted for," or at "the close of the deal."
Gathering the right data for ASC 606 compliance is proving to be an added burden for many companies. While, the gathering of the data for community associations may not be as burdensome, there are nevertheless many CPAs who have been raising objections to the applicability of ASC 606 to community associations.
Stay tuned for potentially more to come, as the implementation is just beginning!
Monte Kane and Diana Rivera are both principals at accounting firm, MBAF in Miami.
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2024 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllNavigating Claims Under the Florida Telephone Solicitation Act and Florida Telemarketing Act
4 minute readSecond Circuit Ruling Expands VPPA Scope: What Organizations Need to Know
6 minute readTrending Stories
- 1Judicial Ethics Opinion 24-60
- 2California Implements New Law Banning Medical Debt From Credit Reports
- 3Trump Picks Personal Criminal Defense Lawyers For Solicitor General, Deputy Attorney General
- 4Climate Groups Demonstrate Outside A&O Shearman and Akin Offices
- 5Republican Who Might Become FTC's Next Chair Blasts Democratic Commissioners' 'All Mergers Are Bad' Mindset
Who Got The Work
Michael G. Bongiorno, Andrew Scott Dulberg and Elizabeth E. Driscoll from Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr have stepped in to represent Symbotic Inc., an A.I.-enabled technology platform that focuses on increasing supply chain efficiency, and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The case, filed Oct. 2 in Massachusetts District Court by the Brown Law Firm on behalf of Stephen Austen, accuses certain officers and directors of misleading investors in regard to Symbotic's potential for margin growth by failing to disclose that the company was not equipped to timely deploy its systems or manage expenses through project delays. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Nathaniel M. Gorton, is 1:24-cv-12522, Austen v. Cohen et al.
Who Got The Work
Edmund Polubinski and Marie Killmond of Davis Polk & Wardwell have entered appearances for data platform software development company MongoDB and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The action, filed Oct. 7 in New York Southern District Court by the Brown Law Firm, accuses the company's directors and/or officers of falsely expressing confidence in the company’s restructuring of its sales incentive plan and downplaying the severity of decreases in its upfront commitments. The case is 1:24-cv-07594, Roy v. Ittycheria et al.
Who Got The Work
Amy O. Bruchs and Kurt F. Ellison of Michael Best & Friedrich have entered appearances for Epic Systems Corp. in a pending employment discrimination lawsuit. The suit was filed Sept. 7 in Wisconsin Western District Court by Levine Eisberner LLC and Siri & Glimstad on behalf of a project manager who claims that he was wrongfully terminated after applying for a religious exemption to the defendant's COVID-19 vaccine mandate. The case, assigned to U.S. Magistrate Judge Anita Marie Boor, is 3:24-cv-00630, Secker, Nathan v. Epic Systems Corporation.
Who Got The Work
David X. Sullivan, Thomas J. Finn and Gregory A. Hall from McCarter & English have entered appearances for Sunrun Installation Services in a pending civil rights lawsuit. The complaint was filed Sept. 4 in Connecticut District Court by attorney Robert M. Berke on behalf of former employee George Edward Steins, who was arrested and charged with employing an unregistered home improvement salesperson. The complaint alleges that had Sunrun informed the Connecticut Department of Consumer Protection that the plaintiff's employment had ended in 2017 and that he no longer held Sunrun's home improvement contractor license, he would not have been hit with charges, which were dismissed in May 2024. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Jeffrey A. Meyer, is 3:24-cv-01423, Steins v. Sunrun, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Greenberg Traurig shareholder Joshua L. Raskin has entered an appearance for boohoo.com UK Ltd. in a pending patent infringement lawsuit. The suit, filed Sept. 3 in Texas Eastern District Court by Rozier Hardt McDonough on behalf of Alto Dynamics, asserts five patents related to an online shopping platform. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Rodney Gilstrap, is 2:24-cv-00719, Alto Dynamics, LLC v. boohoo.com UK Limited.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250