'EEEEEEEYOOOOOO': Miami, Nashville Lawyers Worked 18 Months to Get Pitbull That Trademark
Pitbull joined an exclusive club of 36, with the likes of "60 Minutes," with its distinctive clock ticking, and MGM, with its powerful lion's roar.
April 24, 2020 at 11:00 AM
4 minute read
It's an 'EEEEEEEYOOOOOO' that's been heard around the world.
And several attorneys from Tennessee and South Florida had a hand in registering the trademark for singer Pitbull's famous shout.
The U.S. Patent and Trademark Office awarded trademark protection to Miami-born musician Armando Christian Perez, better known as Pitbull, for his signature yell, or "grito," for both sound recordings and live performances. Pitbull joins an exclusive club of 36 registrants who have received trademark protection for familiar sounds, or sounds without words accompanying them, attorneys say.
Backing up the singer was a team of Florida and Tennessee lawyers, including Leslie José Zigel, the chair of the entertainment, media and technology group at Greenspoon Marder in Miami; Justin F. McNaughton, a Nashville-based patent and trademark attorney; and Ryan Kairalla, a Miami attorney specializing in entertainment and education law.
It took about 18 months to secure the trademark registration for the global superstar. The attorneys had to prove under the Lanham Act that Pitbull used his grito in commerce as a trademark, while demonstrating that he is legally entitled to register the sound as a federally protected trademark.
|Not so easy
The attorneys had to prove two concepts: distinctiveness and consistency.
And that's not an easy task, according to McNaughton. For instance, applicants failed to meet the standard in a recent case involving two amphibious boat tour operators, who were fighting over a duck call.
One of the tour boat operators determined that having the sole right to blow a duck call during an amphibious boat tour would be a significant marketing advantage, and obtained a federal trademark for the use of a duck call. But when a competitor challenged, the U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of Pennsylvania ruled that the sound of a duck call was too familiar to be distinctive.
Also, the registrant's evidence failed to show customers necessarily associated the duck call with the tour company that obtained the registration. Because of that lack of association, McNaughton said, a person on a tour would hear the duck call whistle and likely think, "Oh, there is some strange guy blowing a duck whistle on top of an amphibious vehicle."
"It is not to say they couldn't have done that," he added. "But they would have had to have done a lot more advertising. They would have had to have done a lot more consistent use, and really train people that when they hear that sound, that's these people."
In Pitbull's case, there was a similar conflict. The lawyers say the approach they took in the trademark application is that the sound is synonymous with Pitbull's brand, and that brand needs to be protected.
The conflict arose in June 2017, when Colombian singer J. Balvin and French producer Willy William released the song "Mi Gente." The massive hit had Pitbull's "EEEEEEEYOOOOOO" grito, but Pitbull was not on the track.
Pitbull's lawyers claimed the sound has been a hallmark of his work for more than two decades. In response to the release of Mi Gente, Pitbull released a remix of the song for his fans. He also registered "the first call sign by a musical artist for sound recordings in the principal trademark register," according to a law review article by Zigel, McNaughton, Kairella and Pitbull, published by the NYU School of Law Journal of Intellectual Property and Entertainment Law,
After the familiar sound trademark was approved, Pitbull joined the likes of "60 Minutes," with its distinctive clock ticking, and MGM, which owns the powerful lion's roar heard at the start of movies it produces and distributes.
Pitbull's lawyers believe this short list of successful sound-trademark holders will add more musical artists in the near future.
"Given the prevalence of these call signs throughout the music industry, it is only a matter of time before other music superstars embrace this valuable branding protection and seek to obtain registration for their unique sonic signatures," the authors state in the NYU law review article. "And they would be wise to do so."
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2024 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View All$7M Arbitration Award Achieved by South Florida Lawyers Over NFL Dispute
Law Firms Mentioned
Trending Stories
- 1Pharmacy Lawyers See Promise in NY Regulator's Curbs on PBM Industry
- 2Outgoing USPTO Director Kathi Vidal: ‘We All Want the Country to Be in a Better Place’
- 3Supreme Court Will Review Constitutionality Of FCC's Universal Service Fund
- 4'It Refreshes Me': King & Spalding Privacy Leader Doubles as Equestrian Champ
- 5Class Action Filed Against Houston Health Savings Account Firm for Allegedly Confiscating Client Funds
Who Got The Work
Michael G. Bongiorno, Andrew Scott Dulberg and Elizabeth E. Driscoll from Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr have stepped in to represent Symbotic Inc., an A.I.-enabled technology platform that focuses on increasing supply chain efficiency, and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The case, filed Oct. 2 in Massachusetts District Court by the Brown Law Firm on behalf of Stephen Austen, accuses certain officers and directors of misleading investors in regard to Symbotic's potential for margin growth by failing to disclose that the company was not equipped to timely deploy its systems or manage expenses through project delays. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Nathaniel M. Gorton, is 1:24-cv-12522, Austen v. Cohen et al.
Who Got The Work
Edmund Polubinski and Marie Killmond of Davis Polk & Wardwell have entered appearances for data platform software development company MongoDB and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The action, filed Oct. 7 in New York Southern District Court by the Brown Law Firm, accuses the company's directors and/or officers of falsely expressing confidence in the company’s restructuring of its sales incentive plan and downplaying the severity of decreases in its upfront commitments. The case is 1:24-cv-07594, Roy v. Ittycheria et al.
Who Got The Work
Amy O. Bruchs and Kurt F. Ellison of Michael Best & Friedrich have entered appearances for Epic Systems Corp. in a pending employment discrimination lawsuit. The suit was filed Sept. 7 in Wisconsin Western District Court by Levine Eisberner LLC and Siri & Glimstad on behalf of a project manager who claims that he was wrongfully terminated after applying for a religious exemption to the defendant's COVID-19 vaccine mandate. The case, assigned to U.S. Magistrate Judge Anita Marie Boor, is 3:24-cv-00630, Secker, Nathan v. Epic Systems Corporation.
Who Got The Work
David X. Sullivan, Thomas J. Finn and Gregory A. Hall from McCarter & English have entered appearances for Sunrun Installation Services in a pending civil rights lawsuit. The complaint was filed Sept. 4 in Connecticut District Court by attorney Robert M. Berke on behalf of former employee George Edward Steins, who was arrested and charged with employing an unregistered home improvement salesperson. The complaint alleges that had Sunrun informed the Connecticut Department of Consumer Protection that the plaintiff's employment had ended in 2017 and that he no longer held Sunrun's home improvement contractor license, he would not have been hit with charges, which were dismissed in May 2024. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Jeffrey A. Meyer, is 3:24-cv-01423, Steins v. Sunrun, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Greenberg Traurig shareholder Joshua L. Raskin has entered an appearance for boohoo.com UK Ltd. in a pending patent infringement lawsuit. The suit, filed Sept. 3 in Texas Eastern District Court by Rozier Hardt McDonough on behalf of Alto Dynamics, asserts five patents related to an online shopping platform. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Rodney Gilstrap, is 2:24-cv-00719, Alto Dynamics, LLC v. boohoo.com UK Limited.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250