During the Pandemic Law Firms Should Focus on Digital Marketing
If firms can lean into the current situation and make swift changes to their marketing practices that adhere to our new reality, they may just come out of this time on top.
April 24, 2020 at 10:56 AM
4 minute read
COVID19 has presented us all with a major curveball in how we live day-to-day, in business and in our personal lives. Yet I believe that lawyers have a unique opportunity during this pandemic. If firms can lean into the current situation and make swift changes to their marketing practices that adhere to our new reality, they may just come out of this time on top.
While socializing in person is definitely not happening, it doesn't mean people aren't communing … they're doing so online. According to the New York Times, web traffic has been up by nearly 30% since COVID19 hit the United States. With more eyes on screens, law firms would be wise to increase their digital marketing efforts at this time. Could your website use a refresh? Is your professional headshot a decade too old? Now is the time to make adjustments to your firm's web presence and think about increasing your (digital) marketing budget. Are there ways to assert the firm's executive team as thought leaders on the internet? Do you have a coronavirus-centric destination on your website that your clients can visit?
Get creative. Consider hiring an integrated marketing and public relations firm to help solidify your digital brand and the story you are telling across the media landscape right now. Be sure to remember to make your website smart-phone friendly on the backend.
Video is also a great tool to engage people. We see with our clients consistently that their video content performs the highest in terms of engagement, and that potential clients would prefer to watch a short video than read a page of information. Have fun with this! Think about creating a home film studio in your (home) office (you only need a white wall and an iPhone) and see what you can create.
From an SEO perspective, it is imperative that your website is up to date, includes engaging content, and is continuously augmented so that it is readily captured in search engines. If your website is a bit thin at the moment, you might want to consider adding any of the following pages to round it out:
- A COVID19 Resource Center
- FAQ Page
- Client Showcase
- Spotlight Cases
- Blog that is continuously updated with new entries
You'll also want to create ancillary channels, like an Instagram account, to further engage with your audience.
It may seem reductive, but I'd also recommend bolstering your online reviews on third party websites like Yelp, and even Google and Facebook. All of these tactics will help individuals find you when they take to a search engine looking for legal counsel.
It truly has never been more important to make meaningful connections with people, and at the most basic human level, to check in. Are you checking in on your clients? Are you asking them how they are feeling? A sincere call of concern goes a long way. This is not about selling a service, but about bolstering your credibility as a firm that demonstrated care and tact during this challenging time.
Networking, in the traditional sense, is an obvious no-no right now. Again, get creative! Are there ways for you to meet new prospects that adhere to social distancing rules? See if your trade organizations have created digital programming that you can partake in at this time. Become savvy with digital tools like LinkedIn and Facebook and don't be afraid to "friend" prospective clients that you may not know, so long as you explain your reason for doing so (a mutual connection, etc). There are digital substitutes that exist and soon enough, become the standard for doing business during this time. Why not be ahead of the curve?
During COVID10, digital marketing is king, and you have everything you need to bolster your web presence, brand identity,and story as a law firm. Will you rise to the challenge?
Julie Talenfeld is the president of BoardroomPR, one of Florida's largest integrated marketing agencies. She can be reached at [email protected].
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2024 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllNavigating Claims Under the Florida Telephone Solicitation Act and Florida Telemarketing Act
4 minute readSecond Circuit Ruling Expands VPPA Scope: What Organizations Need to Know
6 minute readTrending Stories
- 1Gibson Dunn Sued By Crypto Client After Lateral Hire Causes Conflict of Interest
- 2Trump's Solicitor General Expected to 'Flip' Prelogar's Positions at Supreme Court
- 3Pharmacy Lawyers See Promise in NY Regulator's Curbs on PBM Industry
- 4Outgoing USPTO Director Kathi Vidal: ‘We All Want the Country to Be in a Better Place’
- 5Supreme Court Will Review Constitutionality Of FCC's Universal Service Fund
Who Got The Work
Michael G. Bongiorno, Andrew Scott Dulberg and Elizabeth E. Driscoll from Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr have stepped in to represent Symbotic Inc., an A.I.-enabled technology platform that focuses on increasing supply chain efficiency, and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The case, filed Oct. 2 in Massachusetts District Court by the Brown Law Firm on behalf of Stephen Austen, accuses certain officers and directors of misleading investors in regard to Symbotic's potential for margin growth by failing to disclose that the company was not equipped to timely deploy its systems or manage expenses through project delays. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Nathaniel M. Gorton, is 1:24-cv-12522, Austen v. Cohen et al.
Who Got The Work
Edmund Polubinski and Marie Killmond of Davis Polk & Wardwell have entered appearances for data platform software development company MongoDB and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The action, filed Oct. 7 in New York Southern District Court by the Brown Law Firm, accuses the company's directors and/or officers of falsely expressing confidence in the company’s restructuring of its sales incentive plan and downplaying the severity of decreases in its upfront commitments. The case is 1:24-cv-07594, Roy v. Ittycheria et al.
Who Got The Work
Amy O. Bruchs and Kurt F. Ellison of Michael Best & Friedrich have entered appearances for Epic Systems Corp. in a pending employment discrimination lawsuit. The suit was filed Sept. 7 in Wisconsin Western District Court by Levine Eisberner LLC and Siri & Glimstad on behalf of a project manager who claims that he was wrongfully terminated after applying for a religious exemption to the defendant's COVID-19 vaccine mandate. The case, assigned to U.S. Magistrate Judge Anita Marie Boor, is 3:24-cv-00630, Secker, Nathan v. Epic Systems Corporation.
Who Got The Work
David X. Sullivan, Thomas J. Finn and Gregory A. Hall from McCarter & English have entered appearances for Sunrun Installation Services in a pending civil rights lawsuit. The complaint was filed Sept. 4 in Connecticut District Court by attorney Robert M. Berke on behalf of former employee George Edward Steins, who was arrested and charged with employing an unregistered home improvement salesperson. The complaint alleges that had Sunrun informed the Connecticut Department of Consumer Protection that the plaintiff's employment had ended in 2017 and that he no longer held Sunrun's home improvement contractor license, he would not have been hit with charges, which were dismissed in May 2024. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Jeffrey A. Meyer, is 3:24-cv-01423, Steins v. Sunrun, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Greenberg Traurig shareholder Joshua L. Raskin has entered an appearance for boohoo.com UK Ltd. in a pending patent infringement lawsuit. The suit, filed Sept. 3 in Texas Eastern District Court by Rozier Hardt McDonough on behalf of Alto Dynamics, asserts five patents related to an online shopping platform. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Rodney Gilstrap, is 2:24-cv-00719, Alto Dynamics, LLC v. boohoo.com UK Limited.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250