2 New Laws Could Help Save S. Fla.'s Hospitality, Restaurant and Tourism Industries
Two recent developments will help many in the hospitality, restaurant and tourism industries avoid permanently shuttering their businesses due to the global COVID-19 pandemic.
April 27, 2020 at 09:07 AM
5 minute read
Two recent developments will help many in the hospitality, restaurant and tourism industries avoid permanently shuttering their businesses due to the global COVID-19 pandemic.
The first we all know about—the CARES Act, which was enacted to address the economic impacts of COVID-19. The other, the Small Business Reorganization Act (the SBRA), has received relatively little fanfare since it went into effect on Feb. 19, just before the coronavirus started grabbing all the headlines.
The SBRA, appearing in Subchapter V of Chapter 11 of the Bankruptcy Code, provides small businesses with a more streamlined and cost-effective restructuring process than the traditional Chapter 11 bankruptcy. Why does this matter? Because high administrative costs had made it impossible for many small business owners to use bankruptcy to successfully restructure their debts, and they instead had to shut down their companies.
Even before the pandemic, the SBRA was meant to provide a much-needed lifeline to small businesses struggling to survive. The CARES Act makes a temporary, but significant, amendment to the SBRA—making this lifeline available to many more businesses in financial distress.
As originally written, the SBRA provides for a "debt ceiling" of just over $2.75 million for a "small business debtor" (either a company or an individual) that/who is primarily engaged in commercial or business activity. Now, the CARES Act temporarily increases that debt limit to $7.5 million. Lifting the ceiling increases the number, and types, of businesses that can use bankruptcy to survive the current crisis.
The SBRA, as amended by the CARES Act, will be a critical tool to save businesses. Expanding access to the SBRA's streamlined reorganization process will facilitate the recapitalization of these otherwise viable businesses and help them to bounce back from the economic effects of the pandemic more quickly, easily and cheaper than the traditional Chapter 11 process.
Another major change under the SBRA means that business owners no longer need to provide their own capital (also referred to as "new value") in order to reorganize over the objections of their unsecured creditors. This, in turn, means that business owners are in a much stronger negotiating position than they may have been in the past. Now, a small business owner can tell its unsecured creditors, "There's nothing to prevent us from confirming our plan of reorganization even if you disapprove, so let's make a deal."
Creditors will also need to understand how to navigate this new bankruptcy path because it affects them, too.
The biggest problem that most creditors face in a bankruptcy—indeed, in any type of court proceeding—is uncertainty. Because that uncertainty is now compounded by the unpredictability inherent with a global pandemic, it would be beneficial for creditors to understand these new laws so they protect themselves, and hopefully reach agreements as to how much, and when, they will eventually get paid.
The same logic applies to landlords and other secured creditors. Since it is unlikely that commercial landlords will be able to find replacement tenants during a global pandemic, they would be wise to work collaboratively with their current tenants to ensure they can restart their businesses, and start paying rent again, as soon as possible.
A clever restauranteur or hotelier who reaches deals with his creditors before filing for bankruptcy can also file what's known as a "prepackaged" plan of reorganization. Business owners who have everything neatly "tied up with a bow" will be more likely to have their plans approved by the court, certainly faster and at a much lower cost.
Given that we will see a flood of bankruptcies in coming months, debtors and creditors should start thinking now about how to assemble reorganization plans that include outside financing. Debtors can watch for investment funds now being formed that will put their skin in the game, albeit at higher interest rates. They will support plans that have a reasonable likelihood of success.
With more leverage and leeway under the SBRA and the CARES Act, debtors, hoteliers, restauranteurs and other South Florida business owners should understand that bankruptcy is not the dead end it may have been just two months ago. Creditors should also realize this too. Proper use of the two acts together means that, rather than lose their restaurants or hotels to debts that are piling up during the prolonged pandemic closure, business owners can work out a plan to keep their employees and save their businesses. If both sides work together, they can save more businesses, more jobs and ultimately help the South Florida economy come back faster—for everyone's benefit.
These changes will only last until March of 2021, so it is extremely important for business owners to act quickly if they want to take advantage of these critical tools to help protect their investments and save their businesses.
Matthew S. Kish is an attorney with Shapiro, Blasi, Wasserman & Hermann focusing his practice on bankruptcy, corporate restructuring and creditor rights. He may be reached at 561- 477-7800 or [email protected].
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2025 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllDon’t Forget the Owner’s Manual: A Guide to Proving Liability Through Manufacturers’ Warnings and Instructions
5 minute readLeveraging the Power of Local Chambers of Commerce: A Second-Career Lawyer’s Guide to Building a Thriving Practice
5 minute readTrending Stories
- 1How ‘Bilateral Tapping’ Can Help with Stress and Anxiety
- 2How Law Firms Can Make Business Services a Performance Champion
- 3'Digital Mindset': Hogan Lovells' New Global Managing Partner for Digitalization
- 4Silk Road Founder Ross Ulbricht Has New York Sentence Pardoned by Trump
- 5Settlement Allows Spouses of U.S. Citizens to Reopen Removal Proceedings
Who Got The Work
J. Brugh Lower of Gibbons has entered an appearance for industrial equipment supplier Devco Corporation in a pending trademark infringement lawsuit. The suit, accusing the defendant of selling knock-off Graco products, was filed Dec. 18 in New Jersey District Court by Rivkin Radler on behalf of Graco Inc. and Graco Minnesota. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Zahid N. Quraishi, is 3:24-cv-11294, Graco Inc. et al v. Devco Corporation.
Who Got The Work
Rebecca Maller-Stein and Kent A. Yalowitz of Arnold & Porter Kaye Scholer have entered their appearances for Hanaco Venture Capital and its executives, Lior Prosor and David Frankel, in a pending securities lawsuit. The action, filed on Dec. 24 in New York Southern District Court by Zell, Aron & Co. on behalf of Goldeneye Advisors, accuses the defendants of negligently and fraudulently managing the plaintiff's $1 million investment. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Vernon S. Broderick, is 1:24-cv-09918, Goldeneye Advisors, LLC v. Hanaco Venture Capital, Ltd. et al.
Who Got The Work
Attorneys from A&O Shearman has stepped in as defense counsel for Toronto-Dominion Bank and other defendants in a pending securities class action. The suit, filed Dec. 11 in New York Southern District Court by Bleichmar Fonti & Auld, accuses the defendants of concealing the bank's 'pervasive' deficiencies in regards to its compliance with the Bank Secrecy Act and the quality of its anti-money laundering controls. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Arun Subramanian, is 1:24-cv-09445, Gonzalez v. The Toronto-Dominion Bank et al.
Who Got The Work
Crown Castle International, a Pennsylvania company providing shared communications infrastructure, has turned to Luke D. Wolf of Gordon Rees Scully Mansukhani to fend off a pending breach-of-contract lawsuit. The court action, filed Nov. 25 in Michigan Eastern District Court by Hooper Hathaway PC on behalf of The Town Residences LLC, accuses Crown Castle of failing to transfer approximately $30,000 in utility payments from T-Mobile in breach of a roof-top lease and assignment agreement. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Susan K. Declercq, is 2:24-cv-13131, The Town Residences LLC v. T-Mobile US, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Wilfred P. Coronato and Daniel M. Schwartz of McCarter & English have stepped in as defense counsel to Electrolux Home Products Inc. in a pending product liability lawsuit. The court action, filed Nov. 26 in New York Eastern District Court by Poulos Lopiccolo PC and Nagel Rice LLP on behalf of David Stern, alleges that the defendant's refrigerators’ drawers and shelving repeatedly break and fall apart within months after purchase. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Joan M. Azrack, is 2:24-cv-08204, Stern v. Electrolux Home Products, Inc.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250