2 New Laws Could Help Save S. Fla.'s Hospitality, Restaurant and Tourism Industries
Two recent developments will help many in the hospitality, restaurant and tourism industries avoid permanently shuttering their businesses due to the global COVID-19 pandemic.
April 27, 2020 at 09:07 AM
5 minute read
Two recent developments will help many in the hospitality, restaurant and tourism industries avoid permanently shuttering their businesses due to the global COVID-19 pandemic.
The first we all know about—the CARES Act, which was enacted to address the economic impacts of COVID-19. The other, the Small Business Reorganization Act (the SBRA), has received relatively little fanfare since it went into effect on Feb. 19, just before the coronavirus started grabbing all the headlines.
The SBRA, appearing in Subchapter V of Chapter 11 of the Bankruptcy Code, provides small businesses with a more streamlined and cost-effective restructuring process than the traditional Chapter 11 bankruptcy. Why does this matter? Because high administrative costs had made it impossible for many small business owners to use bankruptcy to successfully restructure their debts, and they instead had to shut down their companies.
Even before the pandemic, the SBRA was meant to provide a much-needed lifeline to small businesses struggling to survive. The CARES Act makes a temporary, but significant, amendment to the SBRA—making this lifeline available to many more businesses in financial distress.
As originally written, the SBRA provides for a "debt ceiling" of just over $2.75 million for a "small business debtor" (either a company or an individual) that/who is primarily engaged in commercial or business activity. Now, the CARES Act temporarily increases that debt limit to $7.5 million. Lifting the ceiling increases the number, and types, of businesses that can use bankruptcy to survive the current crisis.
The SBRA, as amended by the CARES Act, will be a critical tool to save businesses. Expanding access to the SBRA's streamlined reorganization process will facilitate the recapitalization of these otherwise viable businesses and help them to bounce back from the economic effects of the pandemic more quickly, easily and cheaper than the traditional Chapter 11 process.
Another major change under the SBRA means that business owners no longer need to provide their own capital (also referred to as "new value") in order to reorganize over the objections of their unsecured creditors. This, in turn, means that business owners are in a much stronger negotiating position than they may have been in the past. Now, a small business owner can tell its unsecured creditors, "There's nothing to prevent us from confirming our plan of reorganization even if you disapprove, so let's make a deal."
Creditors will also need to understand how to navigate this new bankruptcy path because it affects them, too.
The biggest problem that most creditors face in a bankruptcy—indeed, in any type of court proceeding—is uncertainty. Because that uncertainty is now compounded by the unpredictability inherent with a global pandemic, it would be beneficial for creditors to understand these new laws so they protect themselves, and hopefully reach agreements as to how much, and when, they will eventually get paid.
The same logic applies to landlords and other secured creditors. Since it is unlikely that commercial landlords will be able to find replacement tenants during a global pandemic, they would be wise to work collaboratively with their current tenants to ensure they can restart their businesses, and start paying rent again, as soon as possible.
A clever restauranteur or hotelier who reaches deals with his creditors before filing for bankruptcy can also file what's known as a "prepackaged" plan of reorganization. Business owners who have everything neatly "tied up with a bow" will be more likely to have their plans approved by the court, certainly faster and at a much lower cost.
Given that we will see a flood of bankruptcies in coming months, debtors and creditors should start thinking now about how to assemble reorganization plans that include outside financing. Debtors can watch for investment funds now being formed that will put their skin in the game, albeit at higher interest rates. They will support plans that have a reasonable likelihood of success.
With more leverage and leeway under the SBRA and the CARES Act, debtors, hoteliers, restauranteurs and other South Florida business owners should understand that bankruptcy is not the dead end it may have been just two months ago. Creditors should also realize this too. Proper use of the two acts together means that, rather than lose their restaurants or hotels to debts that are piling up during the prolonged pandemic closure, business owners can work out a plan to keep their employees and save their businesses. If both sides work together, they can save more businesses, more jobs and ultimately help the South Florida economy come back faster—for everyone's benefit.
These changes will only last until March of 2021, so it is extremely important for business owners to act quickly if they want to take advantage of these critical tools to help protect their investments and save their businesses.
Matthew S. Kish is an attorney with Shapiro, Blasi, Wasserman & Hermann focusing his practice on bankruptcy, corporate restructuring and creditor rights. He may be reached at 561- 477-7800 or [email protected].
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2024 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllData Breaches, Increased Regulatory Risk and Florida’s New Digital Bill of Rights
7 minute readNavigating Florida's Products Liability Law: Defective Products, Warnings and the Pursuit of Justice
6 minute readNavigating Florida Property Insurance Claims in a Post-Fee-Shifting World
5 minute readTrending Stories
- 1Call for Nominations: Elite Trial Lawyers 2025
- 2Senate Judiciary Dems Release Report on Supreme Court Ethics
- 3Senate Confirms Last 2 of Biden's California Judicial Nominees
- 4Morrison & Foerster Doles Out Year-End and Special Bonuses, Raises Base Compensation for Associates
- 5Tom Girardi to Surrender to Federal Authorities on Jan. 7
Who Got The Work
Michael G. Bongiorno, Andrew Scott Dulberg and Elizabeth E. Driscoll from Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr have stepped in to represent Symbotic Inc., an A.I.-enabled technology platform that focuses on increasing supply chain efficiency, and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The case, filed Oct. 2 in Massachusetts District Court by the Brown Law Firm on behalf of Stephen Austen, accuses certain officers and directors of misleading investors in regard to Symbotic's potential for margin growth by failing to disclose that the company was not equipped to timely deploy its systems or manage expenses through project delays. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Nathaniel M. Gorton, is 1:24-cv-12522, Austen v. Cohen et al.
Who Got The Work
Edmund Polubinski and Marie Killmond of Davis Polk & Wardwell have entered appearances for data platform software development company MongoDB and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The action, filed Oct. 7 in New York Southern District Court by the Brown Law Firm, accuses the company's directors and/or officers of falsely expressing confidence in the company’s restructuring of its sales incentive plan and downplaying the severity of decreases in its upfront commitments. The case is 1:24-cv-07594, Roy v. Ittycheria et al.
Who Got The Work
Amy O. Bruchs and Kurt F. Ellison of Michael Best & Friedrich have entered appearances for Epic Systems Corp. in a pending employment discrimination lawsuit. The suit was filed Sept. 7 in Wisconsin Western District Court by Levine Eisberner LLC and Siri & Glimstad on behalf of a project manager who claims that he was wrongfully terminated after applying for a religious exemption to the defendant's COVID-19 vaccine mandate. The case, assigned to U.S. Magistrate Judge Anita Marie Boor, is 3:24-cv-00630, Secker, Nathan v. Epic Systems Corporation.
Who Got The Work
David X. Sullivan, Thomas J. Finn and Gregory A. Hall from McCarter & English have entered appearances for Sunrun Installation Services in a pending civil rights lawsuit. The complaint was filed Sept. 4 in Connecticut District Court by attorney Robert M. Berke on behalf of former employee George Edward Steins, who was arrested and charged with employing an unregistered home improvement salesperson. The complaint alleges that had Sunrun informed the Connecticut Department of Consumer Protection that the plaintiff's employment had ended in 2017 and that he no longer held Sunrun's home improvement contractor license, he would not have been hit with charges, which were dismissed in May 2024. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Jeffrey A. Meyer, is 3:24-cv-01423, Steins v. Sunrun, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Greenberg Traurig shareholder Joshua L. Raskin has entered an appearance for boohoo.com UK Ltd. in a pending patent infringement lawsuit. The suit, filed Sept. 3 in Texas Eastern District Court by Rozier Hardt McDonough on behalf of Alto Dynamics, asserts five patents related to an online shopping platform. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Rodney Gilstrap, is 2:24-cv-00719, Alto Dynamics, LLC v. boohoo.com UK Limited.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250