Transitioning From In-Person to Remote Oral Arguments in Fla. Appellate Courts
Florida's appellate lawyers and judges are at the forefront of utilizing technology to prevent the annihilation of oral arguments—a practice that both sides crave.
April 28, 2020 at 10:43 AM
7 minute read
In Aldous Huxley's 1932 novel, "Brave New World," he imagined a genetically engineered future where life was pain-free. Fast-forward almost a century, and COVID-19 has disrupted the world we once knew. Although it seems like technology has made remote work "pain-free," lawyers and judges are adapting to the challenges to avoid a breakdown in the justice system. Florida's appellate lawyers and judges are at the forefront of utilizing technology to prevent the annihilation of oral arguments—a practice that both sides crave.
|The Shift to Remote Oral Arguments
At the pandemic's onset, Florida appellate courts quickly postponed or canceled oral arguments. It was not clear whether the courts would transition to remote oral arguments. However, that soon changed.
On April 14, the Fourth District Court of Appeal became the first appellate court in the state to conduct oral arguments using teleconferencing software. Judges and lawyers interacted from remote locations, while staff masterminded the teleconference and kept the official clock inside the courthouse. Oral arguments were livestreamed on the internet.
The Fourth District's Marshal Daniel DiGiacomo and the IT staff held practice sessions with the judges and separate sessions with the attorneys. The Fourth District sent attorneys a guide titled, "Best Practices for Your Video Oral Argument."
Florida's other district courts of appeal will follow suit and hold remote oral arguments in May. According to Chief Judge Kevin Emas of the Third District Court of Appeal, the Third District has been running mock tests for the judges and will likely hold technology checks on the day of the oral argument for the attorneys.
In addition, the Florida Supreme Court will hold its oral arguments using the same remote technology May 6. This is a departure from its previous decision to postpone arguments until June.
|Tips for Navigating Remote Oral Arguments
Now that remote arguments are here, will this format change how appellate practitioners prepare for oral argument? Probably not. The same rules should apply, but with slightly new variations and obstacles. Here are a few tips to help navigate the brave new world of remote oral arguments:
- Prepare Equipment
First, select a quiet location. For those working remotely with small children, I feel your pain as it is difficult to truly keep them quiet. Find a way to keep them occupied and in another room. Do your best to avoid any distractions from family or even pets while presenting your argument.
Take advantage of the practice sessions the courts are offering. On the morning of your argument, turn on your computer early. Ensure you are properly connected to the internet and the teleconference application. Test your microphone and video connection. Pray your internet connection is strong. Try to have others in your household avoid using the Wi-Fi at the same time to prevent being kicked offline while in the middle of the argument. Close out all other applications on your computer.
Check the lighting. Ensure the light source is in front of you. Close the shades, if needed, or find an area without a glare. Set up in front of a neutral wall. Or, consider using a virtual background, such as a photograph of the courtroom. Position the camera so it is eye level, capturing you from waist up with your head and shoulders as the dominant feature.
Once you are live, be sure to mute your microphone. Avoid answering a cellphone or any other chatter while the video and microphone are live. It was no surprise to advocates that the podium microphone and the video camera might have been live before the judges entered the courtroom. Think of your device as the live microphone on the podium and avoid embarrassing pre-argument comments or gestures.
- Dress Professionally
Any time you go into a courthouse you should dress professionally. Former Third District Court of Appeal Judge David M. Gersten used to tell his law students, "if you want to feel like a lawyer, you should dress like a lawyer."
Now, there may be days when you do not get out of your pajamas. It may be hard to feel like a lawyer when you are juggling your cases with your child's homeschooling duties or simply competing with the daily soap operas. Trust me. Your confidence will show during your argument when you are dressed professionally and sitting up straight—not slouching. You should also avoid leaning over the table or into the screen.
The last thing you want to do is have your appearance impact the credibility of your arguments.
- Speak Clearly
It is essential to check your microphone to ensure it is functioning properly. Speak loud and clear. Avoid mumbling. If you have a headset, that might help with the background noise. External speakers might also provide more clarity when presenting your case.
Unlike in-person oral arguments, where advocates look straight and up toward the bench, you will have a different vantage point. Everyone will be encouraged to utilize the gallery view on the screen to be able to view the panel, your opposing counsel, as well as the time clock.
However, you should avoid looking at your image on the screen. Doing so will appear as if you are looking down. Instead, look straight at the camera when you are speaking.
Like any in-person oral argument, advocates should not read from a script, and they should be able to segue back to their arguments after a judge's question.
Finally, remote software may enable users to share their screens. However, advocates should utilize such an application cautiously and only after obtaining approval from the court in advance.
- Listen Carefully
As with in-person oral arguments, advocates should listen carefully to the panel's questions and respond directly. It may be difficult given the platform, but advocates should not interrupt when a judge is speaking.
In the event of a microphone or video malfunction, the panel will likely pause the oral argument and wait until you are able to rejoin the meeting. Staff from the courts will be standing by to help troubleshoot.
|Conclusion
While some are excited to transition to remote oral arguments, others are worried how today's remote arguments will influence the future of oral arguments. No one has a crystal ball. Let's embrace this brave new world. With key preparation, remote oral arguments will go smoothly and remain a meaningful part of appellate practice.
Kimberly Kanoff Berman is special counsel in the Fort Lauderdale office of Marshall Dennehey Warner Coleman & Goggin, a civil defense litigation law firm. She focuses her practice on appellate law and provides pretrial and post-trial litigation support in a wide array of cases in both state and federal courts in Florida. She may be reached at [email protected].
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2024 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllAs a New Year Dawns, the Value of Florida’s Revised Mediation Laws Comes Into Greater Focus
4 minute readData Breaches, Increased Regulatory Risk and Florida’s New Digital Bill of Rights
7 minute readNavigating Florida's Products Liability Law: Defective Products, Warnings and the Pursuit of Justice
6 minute readLaw Firms Mentioned
Trending Stories
Who Got The Work
Michael G. Bongiorno, Andrew Scott Dulberg and Elizabeth E. Driscoll from Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr have stepped in to represent Symbotic Inc., an A.I.-enabled technology platform that focuses on increasing supply chain efficiency, and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The case, filed Oct. 2 in Massachusetts District Court by the Brown Law Firm on behalf of Stephen Austen, accuses certain officers and directors of misleading investors in regard to Symbotic's potential for margin growth by failing to disclose that the company was not equipped to timely deploy its systems or manage expenses through project delays. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Nathaniel M. Gorton, is 1:24-cv-12522, Austen v. Cohen et al.
Who Got The Work
Edmund Polubinski and Marie Killmond of Davis Polk & Wardwell have entered appearances for data platform software development company MongoDB and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The action, filed Oct. 7 in New York Southern District Court by the Brown Law Firm, accuses the company's directors and/or officers of falsely expressing confidence in the company’s restructuring of its sales incentive plan and downplaying the severity of decreases in its upfront commitments. The case is 1:24-cv-07594, Roy v. Ittycheria et al.
Who Got The Work
Amy O. Bruchs and Kurt F. Ellison of Michael Best & Friedrich have entered appearances for Epic Systems Corp. in a pending employment discrimination lawsuit. The suit was filed Sept. 7 in Wisconsin Western District Court by Levine Eisberner LLC and Siri & Glimstad on behalf of a project manager who claims that he was wrongfully terminated after applying for a religious exemption to the defendant's COVID-19 vaccine mandate. The case, assigned to U.S. Magistrate Judge Anita Marie Boor, is 3:24-cv-00630, Secker, Nathan v. Epic Systems Corporation.
Who Got The Work
David X. Sullivan, Thomas J. Finn and Gregory A. Hall from McCarter & English have entered appearances for Sunrun Installation Services in a pending civil rights lawsuit. The complaint was filed Sept. 4 in Connecticut District Court by attorney Robert M. Berke on behalf of former employee George Edward Steins, who was arrested and charged with employing an unregistered home improvement salesperson. The complaint alleges that had Sunrun informed the Connecticut Department of Consumer Protection that the plaintiff's employment had ended in 2017 and that he no longer held Sunrun's home improvement contractor license, he would not have been hit with charges, which were dismissed in May 2024. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Jeffrey A. Meyer, is 3:24-cv-01423, Steins v. Sunrun, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Greenberg Traurig shareholder Joshua L. Raskin has entered an appearance for boohoo.com UK Ltd. in a pending patent infringement lawsuit. The suit, filed Sept. 3 in Texas Eastern District Court by Rozier Hardt McDonough on behalf of Alto Dynamics, asserts five patents related to an online shopping platform. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Rodney Gilstrap, is 2:24-cv-00719, Alto Dynamics, LLC v. boohoo.com UK Limited.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250