'I Was Told To Do Illegal Things': Broward Lawyer Faces Discipline Based on Ex-Assistant's Claims
The grievance committee formed found probable cause to file a complaint against a Fort Lauderdale litigator.
April 29, 2020 at 02:03 PM
3 minute read
Florida disciplinarians just put a Fort Lauderdale litigator on notice that it has probable cause to prosecute him for alleged ethics violations.
The Second Judicial Circuit Grievance Committee found probable cause to prepare a complaint against Phillip Tim Howard, founder of Howard & Associates, which has offices in Florida and Massachusetts.
The committee based its findings on a 2018 complaint filed by Howard's former assistant, Kimberly Poling, who worked for the litigator in his Broward office in 2017 and 2018. It found probable cause for a complaint alleging Howard violated Florida Bar rules governing responsibilities of partners, managers and supervisory lawyers; responsibilities regarding nonlawyer assistants; and direct contact with prospective clients.
The notice of probable cause recommends that Howard review the procedures for admission of "minor misconduct and conditional guilty pleas."
Now, the bar will likely file a formal complaint before the Florida Supreme Court.
Poling filed her 2018 complaint against Howard and a nonlawyer at the law firm, Ankur Mehta. She accused Mehta of establishing a company, Mehta Consulting, to shield Howard from "illegal and unethical conduct." Howard & Associates paid Mehta as an independent contractor through Mehta Consulting.
The Florida Bar closed an investigation into Mehta without pursuing sanctions against him. Its report cited "insufficient information."
Mehta did not immediately respond to request for comment.
Poling alleges Mehta, with Howard's knowledge and consent, told law firm employees to take several improper actions. These range from having Mehta listed as an attorney on several cases, illegally soliciting clients and repeatedly failing to pay the law firm's bills.
Mehta allegedly also told a former colleague — and later on, Poling — to transfer funds from the firm's Interest on Lawyer Trust Account to Mehta Consulting or to another account to cover the firm's operating expenses.
Poling also alleged in her complaint that Mehta told her and a co-worker to contact people on the national "Do Not Call" registry to recruit them for potential class actions against telemarketers. She claimed Howard also failed to report to the bar that the law firm had issued checks it could not honor, including bounced checks for salaries and rent on its Fort Lauderdale office.
Poling claims she did not file the complaint with the bar for any personal monetary gain.
"I simply was trying to defend myself in case Howard did get sued, which he did, 20 times to Tuesday," she said. "And because I was told to do illegal things. I just didn't know if somehow he could twist it around and I could somehow get into trouble. I still don't know."
Read More:
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2024 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllMuhammad Ali's Daughter Accused of Ignoring South Florida Judge
In Upholding Ruling, Sixth DCA Certifies Question to Florida Supreme Court
4 minute readPodhurst Orseck, Client and Ex-Partner Face Nearly $575K in Attorney Fees
4 minute readJudge Recommends $424K in Attorney Fees in BioPlus Data Breach Settlement
3 minute readTrending Stories
Who Got The Work
Michael G. Bongiorno, Andrew Scott Dulberg and Elizabeth E. Driscoll from Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr have stepped in to represent Symbotic Inc., an A.I.-enabled technology platform that focuses on increasing supply chain efficiency, and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The case, filed Oct. 2 in Massachusetts District Court by the Brown Law Firm on behalf of Stephen Austen, accuses certain officers and directors of misleading investors in regard to Symbotic's potential for margin growth by failing to disclose that the company was not equipped to timely deploy its systems or manage expenses through project delays. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Nathaniel M. Gorton, is 1:24-cv-12522, Austen v. Cohen et al.
Who Got The Work
Edmund Polubinski and Marie Killmond of Davis Polk & Wardwell have entered appearances for data platform software development company MongoDB and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The action, filed Oct. 7 in New York Southern District Court by the Brown Law Firm, accuses the company's directors and/or officers of falsely expressing confidence in the company’s restructuring of its sales incentive plan and downplaying the severity of decreases in its upfront commitments. The case is 1:24-cv-07594, Roy v. Ittycheria et al.
Who Got The Work
Amy O. Bruchs and Kurt F. Ellison of Michael Best & Friedrich have entered appearances for Epic Systems Corp. in a pending employment discrimination lawsuit. The suit was filed Sept. 7 in Wisconsin Western District Court by Levine Eisberner LLC and Siri & Glimstad on behalf of a project manager who claims that he was wrongfully terminated after applying for a religious exemption to the defendant's COVID-19 vaccine mandate. The case, assigned to U.S. Magistrate Judge Anita Marie Boor, is 3:24-cv-00630, Secker, Nathan v. Epic Systems Corporation.
Who Got The Work
David X. Sullivan, Thomas J. Finn and Gregory A. Hall from McCarter & English have entered appearances for Sunrun Installation Services in a pending civil rights lawsuit. The complaint was filed Sept. 4 in Connecticut District Court by attorney Robert M. Berke on behalf of former employee George Edward Steins, who was arrested and charged with employing an unregistered home improvement salesperson. The complaint alleges that had Sunrun informed the Connecticut Department of Consumer Protection that the plaintiff's employment had ended in 2017 and that he no longer held Sunrun's home improvement contractor license, he would not have been hit with charges, which were dismissed in May 2024. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Jeffrey A. Meyer, is 3:24-cv-01423, Steins v. Sunrun, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Greenberg Traurig shareholder Joshua L. Raskin has entered an appearance for boohoo.com UK Ltd. in a pending patent infringement lawsuit. The suit, filed Sept. 3 in Texas Eastern District Court by Rozier Hardt McDonough on behalf of Alto Dynamics, asserts five patents related to an online shopping platform. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Rodney Gilstrap, is 2:24-cv-00719, Alto Dynamics, LLC v. boohoo.com UK Limited.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250