New Orders Allowing Reopening of Community Pools? Not So Fast!
Over the course of the last few days, there has been much discussion about the reopening of businesses and resumption of normal daily activities. There is no consensus as to what level of reopening is appropriate and what "normal" actually is.
April 29, 2020 at 10:39 AM
5 minute read
As we continue to struggle with the social, economic and emotional side effects of the COVID-19 pandemic, many are now looking toward reopening and restarting their lives. Over the course of the last few days, there has been much discussion about the reopening of businesses and resumption of normal daily activities. There is no consensus as to what level of reopening is appropriate and what "normal" actually is.
On Monday, April 27, Miami-Dade, Broward and Palm Beach counties each announced their intent to lift certain restrictions and closures of parks, golf courses, marinas, community pools and boat ramps. As of the moment, Miami-Dade and Palm Beach counties have issued orders, and it appears that an order from Broward is soon to follow. Additionally, Gov. Ron DeSantis announced that he would be revealing a reopening plan on Wednesday, April 29.
Pursuant to Miami-Dade County Emergency Order 21-20, effective April 29, parks and recreational facilities may be open, but limited to active and passive uses, following current CDC and State Health Department guidelines. Key provisions of Order 21-20 include:
- No groups of 10 or more are permitted to congregate in parks or recreational facilities, and all persons, excepting family must observe social distancing protocols.
- Active uses that are allowed include: walking, jogging, hiking, skating, cycling, nature walks on trails and sports skills practice by individuals or between family members. Organized or competitive play is prohibited, except for singles tennis play.
- Passive use of parks is permitted, provided that social distancing is observed, but table games, picnics and parties are prohibited.
- Facial coverings must be worn, except for children under the age of 2 or persons who have trouble breathing due to chronic preexisting conditions.
- Parks and recreational facilities must provide a restroom attendant, and restrooms must be cleaned at least once every two hours with CDC-approved products. Moreover, restroom use shall be limited to one person or one family at a time.
- Use of the following amenities remains prohibited: bike racks; playgrounds and exercise equipment; dog parks; recreation buildings, picnic shelters, gyms, campgrounds; skate parks; splash pads and swimming pools; mechanical attractions and concessions.
Order 21-20 also opens marinas, boat launches, docking, fueling, marine supply and other marina services as well as golf courses under limited circumstances, and under specific protocols. Miami-Dade County has continued the closure of all beaches.
Broward County has also commenced reopening some parks and nature trails operated by the county for walking, jogging, biking, hiking, horseback riding and personal boat launching. However, as of the moment that this article is being written, there is no order regarding other amenities such as tennis and community pools.
In Palm Beach County, Emergency Order Number 5, issued on April 27, provides for the reopening of boat ramps, marinas, golf courses, parks, natural areas, tennis courts and community pools, but requires adherence to CDC guidelines. Specifically, with regard to tennis and outdoor racquet facilities, as well as community pools, the Order Number 5 provides the following restrictions:
- For tennis courts, singles play only is permitted; no congregating on the court or sidelines is permitted.
- Locker room and shower facilities are to remain closed. Restrooms must be cleaned and disinfected regularly throughout the day, and soap and water or hand sanitizer and disinfectant wipes must be provided in each restroom.
- Pool capacity must be limited to ensure that social distancing in accordance with CDC guidelines is maintained at all times.
- Pool deck seating or lounging shall be restricted to ensure social distancing in accordance with CDC guidelines.
- One or more facility staff or management must be present at each facility location to monitor and ensure compliance.
While these orders are meant to restore some sense of normalcy, and provide people with outlets for exercise and activity, for many community associations, reopening may not prove to be feasible as some associations may not be equipped to be able to comply with the CDC requirements and guidelines. Associations must recognize that there is potential liability if they reopen and cannot comply with CDC guidelines and even if they do comply, there could still be liability issues if there is an outbreak in the building as a result. This will be a difficult balancing act as associations could also face challenges from owners anxious to use amenities.
Many associations do not have the staff necessary to monitor and ensure compliance with social distancing requirements or the ability to regularly clean (no less than once every two hours in Miami-Dade) the restroom facilities. Under these cases, reopening of amenities may prove to be an undue burden on many associations currently struggling to maintain operations during the pandemic.
If your association is considering reopening, it is important to review your local emergency orders (municipal and county) to determine whether it is feasible to reopen and comply with CDC guidelines.
Carolina Sznajderman Sheir is a partner at Eisinger Law in Hollywood. Her practice focuses on real estate law, community association law, commercial litigation and developer representation. Contact her at [email protected].
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2024 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllNavigating Claims Under the Florida Telephone Solicitation Act and Florida Telemarketing Act
4 minute readSecond Circuit Ruling Expands VPPA Scope: What Organizations Need to Know
6 minute readTrending Stories
- 1How to Support Law Firm Profitability: Train Partners Up
- 2Elon Musk Names Microsoft, Calif. AG to Amended OpenAI Suit
- 3Trump’s Plan to Purge Democracy
- 4Baltimore City Govt., After Winning Opioid Jury Trial, Preparing to Demand an Additional $11B for Abatement Costs
- 5X Joins Legal Attack on California's New Deepfakes Law
Who Got The Work
Michael G. Bongiorno, Andrew Scott Dulberg and Elizabeth E. Driscoll from Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr have stepped in to represent Symbotic Inc., an A.I.-enabled technology platform that focuses on increasing supply chain efficiency, and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The case, filed Oct. 2 in Massachusetts District Court by the Brown Law Firm on behalf of Stephen Austen, accuses certain officers and directors of misleading investors in regard to Symbotic's potential for margin growth by failing to disclose that the company was not equipped to timely deploy its systems or manage expenses through project delays. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Nathaniel M. Gorton, is 1:24-cv-12522, Austen v. Cohen et al.
Who Got The Work
Edmund Polubinski and Marie Killmond of Davis Polk & Wardwell have entered appearances for data platform software development company MongoDB and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The action, filed Oct. 7 in New York Southern District Court by the Brown Law Firm, accuses the company's directors and/or officers of falsely expressing confidence in the company’s restructuring of its sales incentive plan and downplaying the severity of decreases in its upfront commitments. The case is 1:24-cv-07594, Roy v. Ittycheria et al.
Who Got The Work
Amy O. Bruchs and Kurt F. Ellison of Michael Best & Friedrich have entered appearances for Epic Systems Corp. in a pending employment discrimination lawsuit. The suit was filed Sept. 7 in Wisconsin Western District Court by Levine Eisberner LLC and Siri & Glimstad on behalf of a project manager who claims that he was wrongfully terminated after applying for a religious exemption to the defendant's COVID-19 vaccine mandate. The case, assigned to U.S. Magistrate Judge Anita Marie Boor, is 3:24-cv-00630, Secker, Nathan v. Epic Systems Corporation.
Who Got The Work
David X. Sullivan, Thomas J. Finn and Gregory A. Hall from McCarter & English have entered appearances for Sunrun Installation Services in a pending civil rights lawsuit. The complaint was filed Sept. 4 in Connecticut District Court by attorney Robert M. Berke on behalf of former employee George Edward Steins, who was arrested and charged with employing an unregistered home improvement salesperson. The complaint alleges that had Sunrun informed the Connecticut Department of Consumer Protection that the plaintiff's employment had ended in 2017 and that he no longer held Sunrun's home improvement contractor license, he would not have been hit with charges, which were dismissed in May 2024. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Jeffrey A. Meyer, is 3:24-cv-01423, Steins v. Sunrun, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Greenberg Traurig shareholder Joshua L. Raskin has entered an appearance for boohoo.com UK Ltd. in a pending patent infringement lawsuit. The suit, filed Sept. 3 in Texas Eastern District Court by Rozier Hardt McDonough on behalf of Alto Dynamics, asserts five patents related to an online shopping platform. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Rodney Gilstrap, is 2:24-cv-00719, Alto Dynamics, LLC v. boohoo.com UK Limited.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250