New Orders Allowing Reopening of Community Pools? Not So Fast!
Over the course of the last few days, there has been much discussion about the reopening of businesses and resumption of normal daily activities. There is no consensus as to what level of reopening is appropriate and what "normal" actually is.
April 29, 2020 at 10:39 AM
5 minute read
As we continue to struggle with the social, economic and emotional side effects of the COVID-19 pandemic, many are now looking toward reopening and restarting their lives. Over the course of the last few days, there has been much discussion about the reopening of businesses and resumption of normal daily activities. There is no consensus as to what level of reopening is appropriate and what "normal" actually is.
On Monday, April 27, Miami-Dade, Broward and Palm Beach counties each announced their intent to lift certain restrictions and closures of parks, golf courses, marinas, community pools and boat ramps. As of the moment, Miami-Dade and Palm Beach counties have issued orders, and it appears that an order from Broward is soon to follow. Additionally, Gov. Ron DeSantis announced that he would be revealing a reopening plan on Wednesday, April 29.
Pursuant to Miami-Dade County Emergency Order 21-20, effective April 29, parks and recreational facilities may be open, but limited to active and passive uses, following current CDC and State Health Department guidelines. Key provisions of Order 21-20 include:
- No groups of 10 or more are permitted to congregate in parks or recreational facilities, and all persons, excepting family must observe social distancing protocols.
- Active uses that are allowed include: walking, jogging, hiking, skating, cycling, nature walks on trails and sports skills practice by individuals or between family members. Organized or competitive play is prohibited, except for singles tennis play.
- Passive use of parks is permitted, provided that social distancing is observed, but table games, picnics and parties are prohibited.
- Facial coverings must be worn, except for children under the age of 2 or persons who have trouble breathing due to chronic preexisting conditions.
- Parks and recreational facilities must provide a restroom attendant, and restrooms must be cleaned at least once every two hours with CDC-approved products. Moreover, restroom use shall be limited to one person or one family at a time.
- Use of the following amenities remains prohibited: bike racks; playgrounds and exercise equipment; dog parks; recreation buildings, picnic shelters, gyms, campgrounds; skate parks; splash pads and swimming pools; mechanical attractions and concessions.
Order 21-20 also opens marinas, boat launches, docking, fueling, marine supply and other marina services as well as golf courses under limited circumstances, and under specific protocols. Miami-Dade County has continued the closure of all beaches.
Broward County has also commenced reopening some parks and nature trails operated by the county for walking, jogging, biking, hiking, horseback riding and personal boat launching. However, as of the moment that this article is being written, there is no order regarding other amenities such as tennis and community pools.
In Palm Beach County, Emergency Order Number 5, issued on April 27, provides for the reopening of boat ramps, marinas, golf courses, parks, natural areas, tennis courts and community pools, but requires adherence to CDC guidelines. Specifically, with regard to tennis and outdoor racquet facilities, as well as community pools, the Order Number 5 provides the following restrictions:
- For tennis courts, singles play only is permitted; no congregating on the court or sidelines is permitted.
- Locker room and shower facilities are to remain closed. Restrooms must be cleaned and disinfected regularly throughout the day, and soap and water or hand sanitizer and disinfectant wipes must be provided in each restroom.
- Pool capacity must be limited to ensure that social distancing in accordance with CDC guidelines is maintained at all times.
- Pool deck seating or lounging shall be restricted to ensure social distancing in accordance with CDC guidelines.
- One or more facility staff or management must be present at each facility location to monitor and ensure compliance.
While these orders are meant to restore some sense of normalcy, and provide people with outlets for exercise and activity, for many community associations, reopening may not prove to be feasible as some associations may not be equipped to be able to comply with the CDC requirements and guidelines. Associations must recognize that there is potential liability if they reopen and cannot comply with CDC guidelines and even if they do comply, there could still be liability issues if there is an outbreak in the building as a result. This will be a difficult balancing act as associations could also face challenges from owners anxious to use amenities.
Many associations do not have the staff necessary to monitor and ensure compliance with social distancing requirements or the ability to regularly clean (no less than once every two hours in Miami-Dade) the restroom facilities. Under these cases, reopening of amenities may prove to be an undue burden on many associations currently struggling to maintain operations during the pandemic.
If your association is considering reopening, it is important to review your local emergency orders (municipal and county) to determine whether it is feasible to reopen and comply with CDC guidelines.
Carolina Sznajderman Sheir is a partner at Eisinger Law in Hollywood. Her practice focuses on real estate law, community association law, commercial litigation and developer representation. Contact her at [email protected].
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2025 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllTurning the Shock of a January Marital Split Into Effective Strategies for Your Well-Being
5 minute readTrending Issues in Florida Construction Law That Attorneys Need to Be Aware Of
6 minute readTrending Stories
- 1Uber Files RICO Suit Against Plaintiff-Side Firms Alleging Fraudulent Injury Claims
- 2The Law Firm Disrupted: Scrutinizing the Elephant More Than the Mouse
- 3Inherent Diminished Value Damages Unavailable to 3rd-Party Claimants, Court Says
- 4Pa. Defense Firm Sued by Client Over Ex-Eagles Player's $43.5M Med Mal Win
- 5Losses Mount at Morris Manning, but Departing Ex-Chair Stays Bullish About His Old Firm's Future
Who Got The Work
J. Brugh Lower of Gibbons has entered an appearance for industrial equipment supplier Devco Corporation in a pending trademark infringement lawsuit. The suit, accusing the defendant of selling knock-off Graco products, was filed Dec. 18 in New Jersey District Court by Rivkin Radler on behalf of Graco Inc. and Graco Minnesota. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Zahid N. Quraishi, is 3:24-cv-11294, Graco Inc. et al v. Devco Corporation.
Who Got The Work
Rebecca Maller-Stein and Kent A. Yalowitz of Arnold & Porter Kaye Scholer have entered their appearances for Hanaco Venture Capital and its executives, Lior Prosor and David Frankel, in a pending securities lawsuit. The action, filed on Dec. 24 in New York Southern District Court by Zell, Aron & Co. on behalf of Goldeneye Advisors, accuses the defendants of negligently and fraudulently managing the plaintiff's $1 million investment. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Vernon S. Broderick, is 1:24-cv-09918, Goldeneye Advisors, LLC v. Hanaco Venture Capital, Ltd. et al.
Who Got The Work
Attorneys from A&O Shearman has stepped in as defense counsel for Toronto-Dominion Bank and other defendants in a pending securities class action. The suit, filed Dec. 11 in New York Southern District Court by Bleichmar Fonti & Auld, accuses the defendants of concealing the bank's 'pervasive' deficiencies in regards to its compliance with the Bank Secrecy Act and the quality of its anti-money laundering controls. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Arun Subramanian, is 1:24-cv-09445, Gonzalez v. The Toronto-Dominion Bank et al.
Who Got The Work
Crown Castle International, a Pennsylvania company providing shared communications infrastructure, has turned to Luke D. Wolf of Gordon Rees Scully Mansukhani to fend off a pending breach-of-contract lawsuit. The court action, filed Nov. 25 in Michigan Eastern District Court by Hooper Hathaway PC on behalf of The Town Residences LLC, accuses Crown Castle of failing to transfer approximately $30,000 in utility payments from T-Mobile in breach of a roof-top lease and assignment agreement. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Susan K. Declercq, is 2:24-cv-13131, The Town Residences LLC v. T-Mobile US, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Wilfred P. Coronato and Daniel M. Schwartz of McCarter & English have stepped in as defense counsel to Electrolux Home Products Inc. in a pending product liability lawsuit. The court action, filed Nov. 26 in New York Eastern District Court by Poulos Lopiccolo PC and Nagel Rice LLP on behalf of David Stern, alleges that the defendant's refrigerators’ drawers and shelving repeatedly break and fall apart within months after purchase. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Joan M. Azrack, is 2:24-cv-08204, Stern v. Electrolux Home Products, Inc.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250