South Florida Lawyers Secure $2M Settlement in Premises Liability Suit—With No Prior Incidents
While most negligent-security cases involve a string of prior robberies or other crimes at the premises in question, this one was different.
May 04, 2020 at 02:32 PM
6 minute read
Michael Haggard and Christopher Marlowe of The Haggard Law Firm in Coral Gables negotiated a $2 million settlement with the owners of a Pensacola housing complex after a 12-year-old resident was abducted and murdered — allegedly by a frequent guest who was a convicted sex offender.
While most negligent security cases involve a string of prior robberies or other crimes at the complex in question, this one was different.
Haggard and Marlowe centered their arguments around how this small apartment community was managed, alleging it was unreasonable for a man staying there off-lease to have gone unnoticed for more than a year.
The victim, Naomi Jones, was last seen at the Aspen Village apartments May 31, 2017, when she went outside to collect a forgotten dog toy. Her body was found days later in a creek a few miles away.
Jones' accused killer, Robert Howard, had been at the complex that day, and police found that his phone data placed him in the area her body was found on the morning of June 1. Howard is awaiting trial in Escambia County. His attorney Spiro Kypreos did not immediately respond to a request for comment.
Howard's trial was delayed over COVID-19 concerns in March. He has pleaded not guilty to the charges against him but did confess to killing Jones during a police interview.
Jones' mother Shantara Hurry sued complex owners Aspen Village Acquisition LLC and management company Progressive Management of America Inc. in 2018, alleging her daughter wouldn't have been murdered if they would have sorted the legal residents from the illegal ones.
Howard worked in Alabama but allegedly spent most nights at his girlfriend's apartment. He'd also been convicted of raping two women and served 15 years in Alabama prison.
|'Flipping a coin'
Haggard and Marlowe built their case around Howard and his pending criminal charges. They hired investigators to unearth everything they could about him and spoke to dozens of current and former Aspen Village residents.
"All the residents we met with, and former residents, all recognized this guy … as someone who was there every day and night, whose car was always parked there with out-of-state Alabama plates," Marlowe said.
The plaintiffs team also found a former maintenance employee who said he had warned management that between 30% and 40% of the people living there were off-lease.
"If you choose not to look into that, then you're going to really just be flipping a coin as to whether your people will be safe," Haggard said.
Defense attorney Miles A. McGrane IV of Conroy Simberg in Hollywood did not respond to a request for comment by deadline. But he countered that there was no way his clients could have known Howard was living at the apartment complex since Howard worked in Alabama and wasn't on the lease.
A "battle of how many nights he was there" ensued, according to Hurry's lawyers, who noted that, ironically, the complex had a parking problem and that Howard's decal-free car would have stood out.
"They had 40 apartments in total, all on one street. It wasn't difficult to spot a car that's there for a year or so, with out-of-state plates," Marlowe said. "Everybody knew this guy was there, so there's really no excuse for not going and knocking on the door and finding out, 'Who is this person who's here every day and night?' "
The solution for managers was simple, in Haggard's view, as it didn't require security cameras or guards.
" If you simply ran this guy's name, if you put it in a Google search, what would come up is that he's a pedophile," Haggard said. "When you really have simple solutions like that, defendants' insurers do not want to have a jury see how simple something could be and that you could prevent this awful, awful tragedy from occurring."
That investigation was the plaintiff's greatest asset in reaching a settlement, according to Marlowe.
"If we had not uncovered all the other tenants who saw him there all the time, our ability to prove that the defendant should have known if it cared to know would have been almost impossible to overcome," Marlowe said.
Aspen Village's owners agreed to settle for $2 million on March 19, while the management company settled confidentially afterwards.
|'Mama bear'
Jones loved to sing, dance and roller-skate, and took on a protective "mama bear" role for her younger brothers, according to Marlowe.
"Some of the residents that I spoke with who knew that family described her as being a bubbly, happy little girl and always a pleasure to see," Marlowe said. "Their hearts were broken not just because she was a little girl who died way too young in a way too horrible way, but uniquely she was a light, as more than one person described her to me."
Jones' mother and one of her brothers gave touching depositions, according to Marlowe, who said it's hard to put into words what they've been through.
"I think they're still trying to come to grips with it," Marlowe said. "I don't know that they ever will, but Shantara Hurry is an inspiration to her kids and she's doing her best to advocate in the community in Pensacola for crime victims."
Hurry hopes the settlement will help protect other children, according to her lawyers, by encouraging private businesses and apartment communities to up their standards so it's harder for criminals to succeed.
"She [Hurry] saw a personal responsibility to be part of solving a problem and really wanted to help displace predatory crime from apartment communities, and it's doable," Marlowe said.
For Marlowe and Haggard, working on such an emotionally heavy case pushed them to work even harder and longer.
"You're hoping you're saving future kids," Haggard said. "We wont know about it, but one day they'll be someone that kicks out somebody, and they would have saved a life."
Case: Shantara Hurry v. Aspen Village Acquisition
Case No.: 2018 CA 001991
Description: Premises liability
Filing date: Dec. 17, 2018
Settlement date: March 19, 2020
Plaintiffs attorneys: Michael Haggard and Christopher Marlowe, The Haggard Law Firm, Coral Gables
Defense attorneys: Miles A. McGrane IV, Conroy Simberg, Hollywood
Judge: Escambia Circuit Judge Coleman Robinson
Settlement amount: $2 million
Read more:
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2024 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View All'They Got All Bent Out of Shape:' Parkland Lawyers Clash With Each Other
Tampa Jury Returns $5.8M Verdict Against Insurer Who Denied Coverage
2 minute readEven the Chief Judge Noted the Cost of This Broward Case
Marriott's $52M Data Breach Settlement Points to Emerging Trend
Law Firms Mentioned
Trending Stories
- 1Judicial Ethics Opinion 24-61
- 2Decision of the Day: School District's Probe Was a 'Sham'; Title IX Administrator Showed Sex-Based Bias
- 3US Magistrate Judge Embry Kidd Confirmed to 11th Circuit
- 4Shaq Signs $11 Million Settlement to Resolve Astrals Investor Claims
- 5McCormick Consolidates Two Tesla Chancery Cases
Who Got The Work
Michael G. Bongiorno, Andrew Scott Dulberg and Elizabeth E. Driscoll from Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr have stepped in to represent Symbotic Inc., an A.I.-enabled technology platform that focuses on increasing supply chain efficiency, and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The case, filed Oct. 2 in Massachusetts District Court by the Brown Law Firm on behalf of Stephen Austen, accuses certain officers and directors of misleading investors in regard to Symbotic's potential for margin growth by failing to disclose that the company was not equipped to timely deploy its systems or manage expenses through project delays. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Nathaniel M. Gorton, is 1:24-cv-12522, Austen v. Cohen et al.
Who Got The Work
Edmund Polubinski and Marie Killmond of Davis Polk & Wardwell have entered appearances for data platform software development company MongoDB and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The action, filed Oct. 7 in New York Southern District Court by the Brown Law Firm, accuses the company's directors and/or officers of falsely expressing confidence in the company’s restructuring of its sales incentive plan and downplaying the severity of decreases in its upfront commitments. The case is 1:24-cv-07594, Roy v. Ittycheria et al.
Who Got The Work
Amy O. Bruchs and Kurt F. Ellison of Michael Best & Friedrich have entered appearances for Epic Systems Corp. in a pending employment discrimination lawsuit. The suit was filed Sept. 7 in Wisconsin Western District Court by Levine Eisberner LLC and Siri & Glimstad on behalf of a project manager who claims that he was wrongfully terminated after applying for a religious exemption to the defendant's COVID-19 vaccine mandate. The case, assigned to U.S. Magistrate Judge Anita Marie Boor, is 3:24-cv-00630, Secker, Nathan v. Epic Systems Corporation.
Who Got The Work
David X. Sullivan, Thomas J. Finn and Gregory A. Hall from McCarter & English have entered appearances for Sunrun Installation Services in a pending civil rights lawsuit. The complaint was filed Sept. 4 in Connecticut District Court by attorney Robert M. Berke on behalf of former employee George Edward Steins, who was arrested and charged with employing an unregistered home improvement salesperson. The complaint alleges that had Sunrun informed the Connecticut Department of Consumer Protection that the plaintiff's employment had ended in 2017 and that he no longer held Sunrun's home improvement contractor license, he would not have been hit with charges, which were dismissed in May 2024. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Jeffrey A. Meyer, is 3:24-cv-01423, Steins v. Sunrun, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Greenberg Traurig shareholder Joshua L. Raskin has entered an appearance for boohoo.com UK Ltd. in a pending patent infringement lawsuit. The suit, filed Sept. 3 in Texas Eastern District Court by Rozier Hardt McDonough on behalf of Alto Dynamics, asserts five patents related to an online shopping platform. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Rodney Gilstrap, is 2:24-cv-00719, Alto Dynamics, LLC v. boohoo.com UK Limited.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250