Returning to Work? Focus on Mitigating the COVID-19 Workplace Risks
As states like Florida ease up on their social-distancing policies and begin to reopen, employers must be prepared for a new addition to the office:…
May 05, 2020 at 03:03 PM
7 minute read
As states like Florida ease up on their social-distancing policies and begin to reopen, employers must be prepared for a new addition to the office: COVID-19.
Stay-at-home orders and business closures have been instrumental in slowing the spread of the virus, but no amount of time can truly eradicate it from our population. Thus, the onus is on businesses to adjust their operating models to minimize the risk of an outbreak among workers and customers.
"We really won't go back" to work "but rather will see an evolved workplace where things will look very different depending on the organization and sector," PwC US chief people officer Mike Fenlon said by email. "Employers and employees will focus on health, and we can expect to see more flexibility in the way we do our jobs. We can expect many businesses to also re-evaluate their real estate footprints and everyday ways of working."
What will post-COVID workplaces look like? A recent webinar conducted by Holmes Murphy looked at some of the preparations essential business are taking as well as factors all employers should consider as they recall employees to the workplace.
"I've been working with companies keeping them open and setting up plans to bring people back to work," said Dr. Scott Conrad, chief medical officer at the Holmes Murphy insurance brokerage. "We're all learning as we go along. It's very difficult to know the exactly right thing to do at the right moment. Mistakes are going to be made."
Here are some areas you can proactively address before mistakes are made:
|Testing and tracing
Testing and treatment will be the foundation of any return-to-work policy, Conrad said, noting employers simply do not have the ability to prevent the COVID-19 virus from entering the workplace. Instead, a proactive approach will catch it before an outbreak occurs. This can include things like screening employees by checking their temperatures or asking about symptoms before they start their shift, testing them for the virus and for antibodies, and perhaps most importantly contract tracing.
While most employers don't have access to widespread testing and no reliable antibody test exists, mentoring employees is within reach. Once an employee is suspected or confirmed to have the coronavirus, contact tracing will help employers quickly identify others who may have been exposed or in close contact and evaluate or isolate them before further spread.
"Where is the person? Who were they around those two days before they got sick?" Conrad asks, noting legal issues will come into play when deploying a contract tracing strategy.
To help employers, companies like PwC, Salesforce and Kronos are creating tools to help employers with this process as well as other aspects of monitoring employees in this new environment.
|Administrative controls
Administrative controls refer to policies in place for how employees operate in the workplace and encompass things such as personal hygiene, scheduling and social distancing.
"We should rationalize this question: Is this the right time to return to the workplace, and who should return?" said Josh Jacobsen, senior loss control consultant at Holmes Murphy. "If people are productive in the home environment, removing them and the risk from the workplace may be the best practice."
When employees must return to work, consider staggering shifts to prevent overlap and exposure as well as increasing the frequency of cleaning and sanitizing of shared spaces. And of course, employers will want to be aggressive about ensuring employees wash their hands often and don't come to work sick.
"Cleaning isn't just important for the welfare of workers and visitors but for liability and future negligence claims," Jacobsen said. "If the virus was found in the workplace to cause serious injury or death and the employer was aware but failed to take reasonable action, the general duty clause could be used to cite the company."
Social distancing in the workplace may be a bigger issue. "We've literally set up breakrooms with chairs six feet apart, and we come back an hour later and everyone's moved the chairs and is sitting together," Conrad said.
PwC recommends such tools as strategic sign placement to remind employees about social distancing, hand washing and other safety protocols. The best thing to do is to create an official policy for social distancing, including corrective measures and consequences. If employees can't abide by social distancing, it's not out of line to send them home.
Finally, take a look at your policy for allowing outside visitors and vendors on the premises and consider limiting non-essential persons from entering.
|Workplace controls
The physical environment at work is expected to change as employers respond to the ongoing threat of virus exposure. Think an end to open office spaces, increased barriers between desks either through the use of individual offices or a return to cubicle-style walls. In conference rooms, stagger seating to keep a 6-foot distance between each space.
And here's one change that might be hard for employees to stomach: saying goodbye to the breakroom. "Stop the use of breakrooms, microwaves, coffee pots," Jacobsen suggested.
Basically, any shared spaces, including shared equipment, are an opportunity for virus spread. If eliminating shared spaces is too extreme, an alternative would be to create staggered break periods and do a thorough cleaning of shared spaces between use.
PwC recommends floor markings such as those used to designate one-way aisles at supermarkets, shutting down open collaboration spaces and reconfiguring to ensure that all desks and workspaces are at least 6 feet apart.
Leave no stone unturned, Conrad advised. Consider your ventilation system and air circulation, as well as how people physically move through the workplace.
"How do you get in and leave, how do people get to their workspace and avoid launching the virus over a six-foot divider? All of those things have to be taken into consideration," he said. "Walk through things, actually physically do it. We're getting floor plans and literally doing a logistics map to figure out how to keep companies open."
|PPE as a last resort
While several cities are adopting mask requirements for public spaces, think twice before you consider masks or other personal protective equipment policies for your employees.
"PPE is considered a last resort due to human error," Jacobsen said. "It's important to understand that some PPE represents new hazards, such as restricted airflow."
While it certainly doesn't hurt to encourage the use of face coverings, assuming it doesn't create a safety hazard, requiring them is a matter that shouldn't be taken lightly.
"When an employer requires a respirator, there are additional requirements that need to be met, such as training," Jacobsen explained. "If we require an N95 respirator, not only do we need to follow the PPE standard but the respiratory standard."
That's not to say PPE should not be used, but it should not be considered a magic bullet to prevent the spread of COVID-19. Just take the time to assess where the greatest risks of exposure are and where and when masks might have the most impact.
"You don't have to do the same thing in every physical location," Conrad said. "Push on the gas, the brake, depending on the rate in your area. Putting everybody in PPE all the time and having them go through all of those logistics is very challenging."
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2024 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllScammers Target Lawyers Across Country With Fake Court Notices
Troutman Pepper, Davis Polk Cases Put Partners' Feedback for Associates Under the Microscope
6 minute readTrending Stories
- 1Recent Decisions Regarding the Telephone Consumer Protection Act
- 2The Tech Built by Law Firms in 2024
- 3Distressed M&A: Mass Torts, Bankruptcy and Furthering the Search for Consensus: Another Purdue Decision
- 4For Safer Traffic Stops, Replace Paper Documents With ‘Contactless’ Tech
- 5As Second Trump Administration Approaches, Businesses Brace for Sweeping Changes to Immigration Policy
Who Got The Work
Michael G. Bongiorno, Andrew Scott Dulberg and Elizabeth E. Driscoll from Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr have stepped in to represent Symbotic Inc., an A.I.-enabled technology platform that focuses on increasing supply chain efficiency, and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The case, filed Oct. 2 in Massachusetts District Court by the Brown Law Firm on behalf of Stephen Austen, accuses certain officers and directors of misleading investors in regard to Symbotic's potential for margin growth by failing to disclose that the company was not equipped to timely deploy its systems or manage expenses through project delays. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Nathaniel M. Gorton, is 1:24-cv-12522, Austen v. Cohen et al.
Who Got The Work
Edmund Polubinski and Marie Killmond of Davis Polk & Wardwell have entered appearances for data platform software development company MongoDB and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The action, filed Oct. 7 in New York Southern District Court by the Brown Law Firm, accuses the company's directors and/or officers of falsely expressing confidence in the company’s restructuring of its sales incentive plan and downplaying the severity of decreases in its upfront commitments. The case is 1:24-cv-07594, Roy v. Ittycheria et al.
Who Got The Work
Amy O. Bruchs and Kurt F. Ellison of Michael Best & Friedrich have entered appearances for Epic Systems Corp. in a pending employment discrimination lawsuit. The suit was filed Sept. 7 in Wisconsin Western District Court by Levine Eisberner LLC and Siri & Glimstad on behalf of a project manager who claims that he was wrongfully terminated after applying for a religious exemption to the defendant's COVID-19 vaccine mandate. The case, assigned to U.S. Magistrate Judge Anita Marie Boor, is 3:24-cv-00630, Secker, Nathan v. Epic Systems Corporation.
Who Got The Work
David X. Sullivan, Thomas J. Finn and Gregory A. Hall from McCarter & English have entered appearances for Sunrun Installation Services in a pending civil rights lawsuit. The complaint was filed Sept. 4 in Connecticut District Court by attorney Robert M. Berke on behalf of former employee George Edward Steins, who was arrested and charged with employing an unregistered home improvement salesperson. The complaint alleges that had Sunrun informed the Connecticut Department of Consumer Protection that the plaintiff's employment had ended in 2017 and that he no longer held Sunrun's home improvement contractor license, he would not have been hit with charges, which were dismissed in May 2024. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Jeffrey A. Meyer, is 3:24-cv-01423, Steins v. Sunrun, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Greenberg Traurig shareholder Joshua L. Raskin has entered an appearance for boohoo.com UK Ltd. in a pending patent infringement lawsuit. The suit, filed Sept. 3 in Texas Eastern District Court by Rozier Hardt McDonough on behalf of Alto Dynamics, asserts five patents related to an online shopping platform. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Rodney Gilstrap, is 2:24-cv-00719, Alto Dynamics, LLC v. boohoo.com UK Limited.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250