The Florida Bar Is Taking a Hard Look at Lawyers' Social Media Content
Now, social media is all the rage with law firms jockeying for position on Facebook, Instagram, LinkedIn and Twitter. Some practitioners get straight to the point with direct advertising while others try the more subtle approach of a blog post or other informational release such as a scholarly article or legal update.
May 12, 2020 at 09:06 AM
4 minute read
There is obviously great competition for clients in the legal marketplace. What started as advertising on matchbook covers slowly evolved into bus stop advertisements, billboards, radio advertisements, and, eventually, television. Now, social media is all the rage with law firms jockeying for position on Facebook, Instagram, LinkedIn and Twitter. Some practitioners get straight to the point with direct advertising while others try the more subtle approach of a blog post or other informational release such as a scholarly article or legal update.
Florida lawyers know that there is sometimes a fine line between information releases and an advertisement. When it comes to advertising, Florida lawyers must satisfy the dictates of the Florida Bar that scrutinizes lawyer advertising. There are all sorts of things the Florida Bar has determined to be forbidden, such as holding yourself out as an "expert" without the ability for the claim of expertise to be objectively verified or promising a client a result in a particular case. Nonetheless, the advent of social media has placed lawyer communications with prospective clients in the cross hairs of the Florida Bar's increasing scrutiny of the social posts of Florida lawyers.
This appears to be particularly true when lawyers target clients to become representatives in class actions. The latest regulation change for social media was announced recently, as a result of the Board of Governors' January meeting in which the board overturned an 8-3 decision by the Standing Committee on Advertising regarding a lawyer who wanted to use information directed to prospective class action members on social media platforms in order to target specific ads to their social media feeds.
The Florida Bar determined that direct solicitation rules (and not the general advertising rules) apply to targeted social media ads. Lawyers who want to use targeted social media advertisements have to comply with Bar Rule 4-7.18(b). That rule prohibits lawyers from sending written or electronic communications, "directly or indirectly" to potential clients unless it involves a personal injury, wrongful death, or other accident or disaster-related matter that occurred at least 30 days before the communication. In other words, Florida lawyers are not permitted to communicate, directly or indirectly, with accident victims less than thirty days after the event in question takes place.
Those lawyers who seek to communicate with prospective class action members would be well advised to follow the Florida Bar's general advertising rules that can be found at Rule 4-7.13 (regulating deceptive and inherently misleading advertisements), Rule 4-7.14 (defining potentially misleading advertisements), Rule 4-7.15 (discussing unduly manipulative or intrusive advertisements) and Rule 4-7.16 (defining presumptively valid content). While the Florida Bar did not provide its specific rationale for the newly defined approach to regulating social media directed to potential members of a class action, at least some of the rationale may be intuitively obvious. A flood of media that has occurred over the last several years has publicized record attorneys' fee awards for class action lawyers. Members of the general public may be misled into believing that acting as a representative in a class action is a way to make easy money. In reality, however, in most class actions, the lawyers typically earn more than the class action representatives.The scrutiny of social media advertising to potential class action members increases the likelihood that they will begin any foray into class action litigation fully informed.
To ensure your social media advertising plans are in line with the latest regulations, contact the Florida Bar Ethics and Attorney Advertising department at 850-561-5780.
Patricia Beitler is president at Velocitas Interactive Marketing + Public Relations in Miami. She advises clients on communications strategies, digital marketing, social media and public relations. Contact her at [email protected].
Roger Slade is a shareholder at Haber Law in Miami. He concentrates his practice in commercial and business litigation, international business law and litigation, shareholder and partnership litigation, and family law litigation. Contact him at [email protected].
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2025 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllDon’t Forget the Owner’s Manual: A Guide to Proving Liability Through Manufacturers’ Warnings and Instructions
5 minute readLeveraging the Power of Local Chambers of Commerce: A Second-Career Lawyer’s Guide to Building a Thriving Practice
5 minute readTrending Stories
- 1Whether to Choose State or Federal Court in a Case Involving a Franchise?
- 2Am Law 200 Firms Announce Wave of D.C. Hires in White-Collar, Antitrust, Litigation Practices
- 3K&L Gates Files String of Suits Against Electronics Manufacturer's Competitors, Brightness Misrepresentations
- 4'Better of the Split': District Judge Weighs Circuit Divide in Considering Who Pays Decades-Old Medical Bill
- 5Which Georgia Courts Are Closed Today?—Here's a List
Who Got The Work
J. Brugh Lower of Gibbons has entered an appearance for industrial equipment supplier Devco Corporation in a pending trademark infringement lawsuit. The suit, accusing the defendant of selling knock-off Graco products, was filed Dec. 18 in New Jersey District Court by Rivkin Radler on behalf of Graco Inc. and Graco Minnesota. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Zahid N. Quraishi, is 3:24-cv-11294, Graco Inc. et al v. Devco Corporation.
Who Got The Work
Rebecca Maller-Stein and Kent A. Yalowitz of Arnold & Porter Kaye Scholer have entered their appearances for Hanaco Venture Capital and its executives, Lior Prosor and David Frankel, in a pending securities lawsuit. The action, filed on Dec. 24 in New York Southern District Court by Zell, Aron & Co. on behalf of Goldeneye Advisors, accuses the defendants of negligently and fraudulently managing the plaintiff's $1 million investment. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Vernon S. Broderick, is 1:24-cv-09918, Goldeneye Advisors, LLC v. Hanaco Venture Capital, Ltd. et al.
Who Got The Work
Attorneys from A&O Shearman has stepped in as defense counsel for Toronto-Dominion Bank and other defendants in a pending securities class action. The suit, filed Dec. 11 in New York Southern District Court by Bleichmar Fonti & Auld, accuses the defendants of concealing the bank's 'pervasive' deficiencies in regards to its compliance with the Bank Secrecy Act and the quality of its anti-money laundering controls. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Arun Subramanian, is 1:24-cv-09445, Gonzalez v. The Toronto-Dominion Bank et al.
Who Got The Work
Crown Castle International, a Pennsylvania company providing shared communications infrastructure, has turned to Luke D. Wolf of Gordon Rees Scully Mansukhani to fend off a pending breach-of-contract lawsuit. The court action, filed Nov. 25 in Michigan Eastern District Court by Hooper Hathaway PC on behalf of The Town Residences LLC, accuses Crown Castle of failing to transfer approximately $30,000 in utility payments from T-Mobile in breach of a roof-top lease and assignment agreement. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Susan K. Declercq, is 2:24-cv-13131, The Town Residences LLC v. T-Mobile US, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Wilfred P. Coronato and Daniel M. Schwartz of McCarter & English have stepped in as defense counsel to Electrolux Home Products Inc. in a pending product liability lawsuit. The court action, filed Nov. 26 in New York Eastern District Court by Poulos Lopiccolo PC and Nagel Rice LLP on behalf of David Stern, alleges that the defendant's refrigerators’ drawers and shelving repeatedly break and fall apart within months after purchase. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Joan M. Azrack, is 2:24-cv-08204, Stern v. Electrolux Home Products, Inc.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250