Broward Sheriff's General Counsel Criticizes Reinstatement of Fired Deputy Over Parkland School Shooting
The fired sergeant's attorney says Brian Miller is prepared to address the firing on the merits.
May 14, 2020 at 06:11 PM
3 minute read
The general counsel of the Broward County Sheriff's Office spoke out about an arbitrator's "erroneous" decision in litigation stemming from the 2018 mass shooting at Marjory Stoneman Douglas High School in Parkland, Florida.
Attorney Terrence Lynch criticized the decision to reinstate Brian Miller, a sergeant at the sheriff's office fired for remaining by his car during the shooting.
Miller is set to return to with full pay and seniority.
But Lynch said the office stands by its initial termination of Miller. He also said arbitrator Danielle Hargrove had not conducted an evidentiary hearing, nor taken witness testimony.
"The decision was based upon a technicality that we believe was wrongly decided. The arbitrator ruled on a procedural issue that BSO allegedly took too long to conduct the investigation, which is the exact opposite finding of an arbitrator that addressed this same issue in an earlier case," Lynch said in a press release. "The Broward Sheriff's Office is exploring all legal options to address this erroneous decision."
The Marjory Stoneman Douglas Public Safety Commission put together a report following the Valentine's Day massacre in which former student Nikolas Cruz gunned down 17 people and injured 17 others with an assault-style rifle.
It stated that Miller was the first officer on the scene, where he heard three or four shots. The report noted Miller slowly placed a bulletproof vest on his body, stayed behind his car, and did not use his radio to communicate with other law enforcement for about 10 minutes. When more officers arrived, Miller stood by as they went into the building, the report said.
The sheriff's office suggested the report got it right.
"The arbitrator did not address the conduct of Sergeant Miller on the day children and adults were massacred at Marjory Stoneman Douglas High School while he stood by," the office said in a statement. "Nowhere in the decision is he vindicated for his lack of action on that day."
Miller was not the only person who lost his job.
Florida Gov. Ron DeSantis fired then-Sheriff Scott Israel for his handling of the mass shooting. Deputies Edward Eason, Josh Stambaugh and Scot Peterson were also fired.
However, the deputies union at the sheriff's office disagreed with the decision to fire Miller. It said the office violated Miller's constitutional due-process rights by wrongly firing him.
In a press conference Thursday, Miller's attorney, Gary Lippman, said his client is prepared to address the firing on the merits.
He said, "But preliminarily, we filed the motion for summary judgment because BSO had violated his procedural rights."
Read more:
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2024 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View All'Get Rid of the Men': Employer Accused of Discrimination
Employee's Alleged Action Lands Marriott in Court for Defamation, Negligence
Trending Stories
Who Got The Work
Michael G. Bongiorno, Andrew Scott Dulberg and Elizabeth E. Driscoll from Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr have stepped in to represent Symbotic Inc., an A.I.-enabled technology platform that focuses on increasing supply chain efficiency, and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The case, filed Oct. 2 in Massachusetts District Court by the Brown Law Firm on behalf of Stephen Austen, accuses certain officers and directors of misleading investors in regard to Symbotic's potential for margin growth by failing to disclose that the company was not equipped to timely deploy its systems or manage expenses through project delays. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Nathaniel M. Gorton, is 1:24-cv-12522, Austen v. Cohen et al.
Who Got The Work
Edmund Polubinski and Marie Killmond of Davis Polk & Wardwell have entered appearances for data platform software development company MongoDB and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The action, filed Oct. 7 in New York Southern District Court by the Brown Law Firm, accuses the company's directors and/or officers of falsely expressing confidence in the company’s restructuring of its sales incentive plan and downplaying the severity of decreases in its upfront commitments. The case is 1:24-cv-07594, Roy v. Ittycheria et al.
Who Got The Work
Amy O. Bruchs and Kurt F. Ellison of Michael Best & Friedrich have entered appearances for Epic Systems Corp. in a pending employment discrimination lawsuit. The suit was filed Sept. 7 in Wisconsin Western District Court by Levine Eisberner LLC and Siri & Glimstad on behalf of a project manager who claims that he was wrongfully terminated after applying for a religious exemption to the defendant's COVID-19 vaccine mandate. The case, assigned to U.S. Magistrate Judge Anita Marie Boor, is 3:24-cv-00630, Secker, Nathan v. Epic Systems Corporation.
Who Got The Work
David X. Sullivan, Thomas J. Finn and Gregory A. Hall from McCarter & English have entered appearances for Sunrun Installation Services in a pending civil rights lawsuit. The complaint was filed Sept. 4 in Connecticut District Court by attorney Robert M. Berke on behalf of former employee George Edward Steins, who was arrested and charged with employing an unregistered home improvement salesperson. The complaint alleges that had Sunrun informed the Connecticut Department of Consumer Protection that the plaintiff's employment had ended in 2017 and that he no longer held Sunrun's home improvement contractor license, he would not have been hit with charges, which were dismissed in May 2024. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Jeffrey A. Meyer, is 3:24-cv-01423, Steins v. Sunrun, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Greenberg Traurig shareholder Joshua L. Raskin has entered an appearance for boohoo.com UK Ltd. in a pending patent infringement lawsuit. The suit, filed Sept. 3 in Texas Eastern District Court by Rozier Hardt McDonough on behalf of Alto Dynamics, asserts five patents related to an online shopping platform. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Rodney Gilstrap, is 2:24-cv-00719, Alto Dynamics, LLC v. boohoo.com UK Limited.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250