Florida Judge Calls for Review of Law Allowing 'Absurd' Traffic Stops Over License Plates
"I believe it is time for the legislature to once again review this statute so that it properly serves the purpose for which it was intended," Fourth District Court of Appeal Judge Melanie May wrote.
May 15, 2020 at 01:00 PM
4 minute read
A Florida traffic law that governs the visibility of license plates might be a bit too extreme, according to Fourth District Court of Appeal Judge Melanie May, who, in a special concurrence, urged legislators to review it.
May wrote that the wording of Florida Statute 316.605(1) can result in some police officers making "absurd" traffic stops over license plate rims or frames that obscure the words "MyFlorida.com" or "Sunshine State."
The statute says "all letters, numerals, printing, writing, the registration decal and the alphanumeric designation shall be clear and distinct and free from defacement, mutilation, grease and other obscuring matter, so that they will be plainly visible and legible at all times 100 feet from the rear or front."
But May noted that "everyone knows" phrases such as "Sunshine State" are there, and they don't help police identify drivers. Even if they weren't covered by a frame, the judge noted they're probably not visible from 100 feet anyway.
The statute can therefore put courts in a pickle, according to the ruling.
"We and other districts have adhered to the established legal principle that statutes should not be read to reach absurd results," May wrote. "And yet, we must apply a statute by its plain meaning."
May also noted there's no way of knowing how many stops have occurred based on the statute that haven't ended in arrest.
"I venture to say that more than 50% of the vehicles in this state have license plate frames on them," May wrote. "By suggesting that common words that everyone knows exist on the top and bottom of a license provide a basis for a traffic stop when the frame covers part of their lettering leads to an absurd result. I believe it is time for the legislature to once again review this statute so that it properly serves the purpose for which it was intended."
May pointed to State v. St. Jean, a 23-year-old case in which the Fifth DCA found it didn't matter that the county name on a driver's license plate wasn't "plainly visible." Though the statute has been tweaked since then, May said the issue remains.
The opinion stemmed from a criminal case against defendant Herschell Williams, who was pulled over in Sunrise in August 2018 because his tag was obscured by a black plastic frame which made the letters unreadable. He was then charged with possession of cannabis and having a firearm as a convicted felon, according to online case files, which say he pleaded nolo contendere and received five years of probation.
In this case, the Fourth DCA found Broward Circuit Judge Elizabeth Scherer was right to deny Williams' motion to suppress that evidence because the whole plate was illegible.
Deerfield Beach solo practitioner Rick J. Douglas represents the defendant, and Florida Attorney General Ashley Moody and Assistant Attorney General Rachael Kaiman in West Palm Beach represent the state. They did not immediately respond to a request for comment.
|Read the ruling:
|More appeals:
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2024 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllMiami Firm Reaches $1.9M Settlement for Protester's Injuries, Pursues Class Action for Others
COVID-19 Death Suit Against Nursing Home Sent to State Court, 11th Circuit Affirms
Trending Stories
- 1Trailblazing Broward Judge Retires; Legacy Includes Bush v. Gore
- 2Federal Judge Named in Lawsuit Over Underage Drinking Party at His California Home
- 3'Almost an Arms Race': California Law Firms Scooped Up Lateral Talent by the Handful in 2024
- 4Pittsburgh Judge Rules Loan Company's Online Arbitration Agreement Unenforceable
- 5As a New Year Dawns, the Value of Florida’s Revised Mediation Laws Comes Into Greater Focus
Who Got The Work
Michael G. Bongiorno, Andrew Scott Dulberg and Elizabeth E. Driscoll from Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr have stepped in to represent Symbotic Inc., an A.I.-enabled technology platform that focuses on increasing supply chain efficiency, and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The case, filed Oct. 2 in Massachusetts District Court by the Brown Law Firm on behalf of Stephen Austen, accuses certain officers and directors of misleading investors in regard to Symbotic's potential for margin growth by failing to disclose that the company was not equipped to timely deploy its systems or manage expenses through project delays. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Nathaniel M. Gorton, is 1:24-cv-12522, Austen v. Cohen et al.
Who Got The Work
Edmund Polubinski and Marie Killmond of Davis Polk & Wardwell have entered appearances for data platform software development company MongoDB and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The action, filed Oct. 7 in New York Southern District Court by the Brown Law Firm, accuses the company's directors and/or officers of falsely expressing confidence in the company’s restructuring of its sales incentive plan and downplaying the severity of decreases in its upfront commitments. The case is 1:24-cv-07594, Roy v. Ittycheria et al.
Who Got The Work
Amy O. Bruchs and Kurt F. Ellison of Michael Best & Friedrich have entered appearances for Epic Systems Corp. in a pending employment discrimination lawsuit. The suit was filed Sept. 7 in Wisconsin Western District Court by Levine Eisberner LLC and Siri & Glimstad on behalf of a project manager who claims that he was wrongfully terminated after applying for a religious exemption to the defendant's COVID-19 vaccine mandate. The case, assigned to U.S. Magistrate Judge Anita Marie Boor, is 3:24-cv-00630, Secker, Nathan v. Epic Systems Corporation.
Who Got The Work
David X. Sullivan, Thomas J. Finn and Gregory A. Hall from McCarter & English have entered appearances for Sunrun Installation Services in a pending civil rights lawsuit. The complaint was filed Sept. 4 in Connecticut District Court by attorney Robert M. Berke on behalf of former employee George Edward Steins, who was arrested and charged with employing an unregistered home improvement salesperson. The complaint alleges that had Sunrun informed the Connecticut Department of Consumer Protection that the plaintiff's employment had ended in 2017 and that he no longer held Sunrun's home improvement contractor license, he would not have been hit with charges, which were dismissed in May 2024. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Jeffrey A. Meyer, is 3:24-cv-01423, Steins v. Sunrun, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Greenberg Traurig shareholder Joshua L. Raskin has entered an appearance for boohoo.com UK Ltd. in a pending patent infringement lawsuit. The suit, filed Sept. 3 in Texas Eastern District Court by Rozier Hardt McDonough on behalf of Alto Dynamics, asserts five patents related to an online shopping platform. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Rodney Gilstrap, is 2:24-cv-00719, Alto Dynamics, LLC v. boohoo.com UK Limited.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250